Cargando…
Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE: There are no medical interventions for the orphan disease CYLD cutaneous syndrome (CCS). Transcriptomic profiling of CCS skin tumors previously highlighted tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs) as candidate therapeutic targets. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if topical targeting of TRK with an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29955768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1610 |
_version_ | 1783353653689581568 |
---|---|
author | Danilenko, Marina Stamp, Elaine Stocken, Deborah D. Husain, Akhtar Zangarini, Monique Cranston, Amy Stones, Robert Sinclair, Naomi Hodgson, Kirsty Bowett, Susan A. Roblin, David Traversa, Silvio Plummer, Ruth Veal, Gareth Langtry, James A. A. Ashworth, Alan Burn, John Rajan, Neil |
author_facet | Danilenko, Marina Stamp, Elaine Stocken, Deborah D. Husain, Akhtar Zangarini, Monique Cranston, Amy Stones, Robert Sinclair, Naomi Hodgson, Kirsty Bowett, Susan A. Roblin, David Traversa, Silvio Plummer, Ruth Veal, Gareth Langtry, James A. A. Ashworth, Alan Burn, John Rajan, Neil |
author_sort | Danilenko, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: There are no medical interventions for the orphan disease CYLD cutaneous syndrome (CCS). Transcriptomic profiling of CCS skin tumors previously highlighted tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs) as candidate therapeutic targets. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if topical targeting of TRK with an existing topical TRK inhibitor, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), is safe and efficacious in CCS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A phase 1b open-label safety study, followed by a phase 2a within-patient randomized (by tumor), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the Tropomyosin Receptor Antagonism in Cylindromatosis [TRAC] trial). The setting was a single-center trial based at a tertiary dermatogenetics referral center for CCS (Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom). Patients who had germline mutations in CYLD or who satisfied clinical diagnostic criteria for CCS were recruited between March 1, 2015, and July 1, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: In phase 1b, patients with CCS applied pegcantratinib for 4 weeks to a single skin tumor. In phase 2a, allocation of tumors was to either receive active treatment on the right side and placebo on the left side (arm A) or active treatment on the left side and placebo on the right side (arm B). Patients were eligible if they had 10 small skin tumors, with 5 matched lesions on each body side; patients were randomized to receive active treatment (pegcantratinib) to one body side and placebo to the other side once daily for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the number of tumors meeting the criteria for response in a prespecified critical number of pegcantratinib-treated tumors. Secondary clinical outcome measures included an assessment for safety of application, pain in early tumors, and compliance with the trial protocol. RESULTS: In phase 1b, 8 female patients with a median age of 60 years (age range, 41-80 years) were recruited and completed the study. None of the participants experienced any adverse treatment site reactions. Three patients reported reduced pain in treated tumors. In phase 2a (15 patients [13 female; median age, 51 years], with 150 tumors), 2 tumors treated with pegcantratinib achieved the primary outcome measure of response compared with 6 tumors treated with placebo. The primary prespecified number of responses was not met. The incidence of adverse events was low. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), applied once daily appeared to be well tolerated and to penetrate the tumor tissue; however, the low tumor drug concentrations demonstrated are likely to account for the lack of response. Dose-escalation studies to assess the maximal tolerated dose may be beneficial in future studies of CCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN75715723 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6128505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61285052018-09-12 Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial Danilenko, Marina Stamp, Elaine Stocken, Deborah D. Husain, Akhtar Zangarini, Monique Cranston, Amy Stones, Robert Sinclair, Naomi Hodgson, Kirsty Bowett, Susan A. Roblin, David Traversa, Silvio Plummer, Ruth Veal, Gareth Langtry, James A. A. Ashworth, Alan Burn, John Rajan, Neil JAMA Dermatol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: There are no medical interventions for the orphan disease CYLD cutaneous syndrome (CCS). Transcriptomic profiling of CCS skin tumors previously highlighted tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs) as candidate therapeutic targets. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if topical targeting of TRK with an existing topical TRK inhibitor, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), is safe and efficacious in CCS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A phase 1b open-label safety study, followed by a phase 2a within-patient randomized (by tumor), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (the Tropomyosin Receptor Antagonism in Cylindromatosis [TRAC] trial). The setting was a single-center trial based at a tertiary dermatogenetics referral center for CCS (Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom). Patients who had germline mutations in CYLD or who satisfied clinical diagnostic criteria for CCS were recruited between March 1, 2015, and July 1, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: In phase 1b, patients with CCS applied pegcantratinib for 4 weeks to a single skin tumor. In phase 2a, allocation of tumors was to either receive active treatment on the right side and placebo on the left side (arm A) or active treatment on the left side and placebo on the right side (arm B). Patients were eligible if they had 10 small skin tumors, with 5 matched lesions on each body side; patients were randomized to receive active treatment (pegcantratinib) to one body side and placebo to the other side once daily for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the number of tumors meeting the criteria for response in a prespecified critical number of pegcantratinib-treated tumors. Secondary clinical outcome measures included an assessment for safety of application, pain in early tumors, and compliance with the trial protocol. RESULTS: In phase 1b, 8 female patients with a median age of 60 years (age range, 41-80 years) were recruited and completed the study. None of the participants experienced any adverse treatment site reactions. Three patients reported reduced pain in treated tumors. In phase 2a (15 patients [13 female; median age, 51 years], with 150 tumors), 2 tumors treated with pegcantratinib achieved the primary outcome measure of response compared with 6 tumors treated with placebo. The primary prespecified number of responses was not met. The incidence of adverse events was low. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, pegcantratinib, 0.5% (wt/wt), applied once daily appeared to be well tolerated and to penetrate the tumor tissue; however, the low tumor drug concentrations demonstrated are likely to account for the lack of response. Dose-escalation studies to assess the maximal tolerated dose may be beneficial in future studies of CCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN75715723 American Medical Association 2018-06-27 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6128505/ /pubmed/29955768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1610 Text en Copyright 2018 Danilenko M et al. JAMA Dermatology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Danilenko, Marina Stamp, Elaine Stocken, Deborah D. Husain, Akhtar Zangarini, Monique Cranston, Amy Stones, Robert Sinclair, Naomi Hodgson, Kirsty Bowett, Susan A. Roblin, David Traversa, Silvio Plummer, Ruth Veal, Gareth Langtry, James A. A. Ashworth, Alan Burn, John Rajan, Neil Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Targeting Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase in Cutaneous CYLD Defective Tumors With Pegcantratinib: The TRAC Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | targeting tropomyosin receptor kinase in cutaneous cyld defective tumors with pegcantratinib: the trac randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29955768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danilenkomarina targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT stampelaine targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT stockendeborahd targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT husainakhtar targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zangarinimonique targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT cranstonamy targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT stonesrobert targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sinclairnaomi targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT hodgsonkirsty targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bowettsusana targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT roblindavid targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT traversasilvio targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT plummerruth targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT vealgareth targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT langtryjamesaa targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT ashworthalan targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT burnjohn targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial AT rajanneil targetingtropomyosinreceptorkinaseincutaneouscylddefectivetumorswithpegcantratinibthetracrandomizedclinicaltrial |