Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1)
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect influenza A virus for the swift diagnosis and management of patients. However, despite the simplicity and convenience, the low sensitivity of RDTs remains a limitation for their use in point of care testing (POCT). In this study, we develop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30194330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31786-8 |
_version_ | 1783353718717022208 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Seung-Taek Thi Bui, Cuc Kim, Do Thi Hoang V. T. Nguyen, Anh Thi Trinh, Thuy Tien Yeo, Seon-Ju |
author_facet | Yu, Seung-Taek Thi Bui, Cuc Kim, Do Thi Hoang V. T. Nguyen, Anh Thi Trinh, Thuy Tien Yeo, Seon-Ju |
author_sort | Yu, Seung-Taek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect influenza A virus for the swift diagnosis and management of patients. However, despite the simplicity and convenience, the low sensitivity of RDTs remains a limitation for their use in point of care testing (POCT). In this study, we developed a rapid fluorescent immunochromatographic strip test (FICT) and the performance of FICT was confirmed by the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) of H1N1, compared with that of RDT. The limit of detection (LOD) of FICT was improved by 16-fold compared to RDT. FICT showed 85.29% sensitivity (29/34) (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 68.94 to 95.05), 100% specificity (26/26) (95% CI: 86.78 to 100.00), and a strong correlation (kappa; 0. 92) compared with rRT-PCR (20 ≤ Ct ≤ 36). In contrast, RDT (Standard Diagnostics [SD] BIOLINE Influenza Ag A/ B/ A(H1N1) Pandemic) showed 55.88% sensitivity (19/34) (95% CI: 37.87 to 72.82), 100% specificity (26/26) (95% CI: 77.07 to 100), and had a fair correlation with rRT-PCR (kappa; 0. 75). FICT had better sensitivity than RDT (P < 0.01; McNemar’s test). Therefore, FICT has the potential to improve the quality of current rapid POCT for the diagnosis of influenza A/H1N1 infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6128899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61288992018-09-10 Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) Yu, Seung-Taek Thi Bui, Cuc Kim, Do Thi Hoang V. T. Nguyen, Anh Thi Trinh, Thuy Tien Yeo, Seon-Ju Sci Rep Article Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect influenza A virus for the swift diagnosis and management of patients. However, despite the simplicity and convenience, the low sensitivity of RDTs remains a limitation for their use in point of care testing (POCT). In this study, we developed a rapid fluorescent immunochromatographic strip test (FICT) and the performance of FICT was confirmed by the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) of H1N1, compared with that of RDT. The limit of detection (LOD) of FICT was improved by 16-fold compared to RDT. FICT showed 85.29% sensitivity (29/34) (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 68.94 to 95.05), 100% specificity (26/26) (95% CI: 86.78 to 100.00), and a strong correlation (kappa; 0. 92) compared with rRT-PCR (20 ≤ Ct ≤ 36). In contrast, RDT (Standard Diagnostics [SD] BIOLINE Influenza Ag A/ B/ A(H1N1) Pandemic) showed 55.88% sensitivity (19/34) (95% CI: 37.87 to 72.82), 100% specificity (26/26) (95% CI: 77.07 to 100), and had a fair correlation with rRT-PCR (kappa; 0. 75). FICT had better sensitivity than RDT (P < 0.01; McNemar’s test). Therefore, FICT has the potential to improve the quality of current rapid POCT for the diagnosis of influenza A/H1N1 infection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6128899/ /pubmed/30194330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31786-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Yu, Seung-Taek Thi Bui, Cuc Kim, Do Thi Hoang V. T. Nguyen, Anh Thi Trinh, Thuy Tien Yeo, Seon-Ju Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) |
title | Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza A virus (H1N1) |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of rapid fluorescent diagnostic immunochromatographic test for influenza a virus (h1n1) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30194330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31786-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuseungtaek clinicalevaluationofrapidfluorescentdiagnosticimmunochromatographictestforinfluenzaavirush1n1 AT thibuicuc clinicalevaluationofrapidfluorescentdiagnosticimmunochromatographictestforinfluenzaavirush1n1 AT kimdothihoang clinicalevaluationofrapidfluorescentdiagnosticimmunochromatographictestforinfluenzaavirush1n1 AT vtnguyenanh clinicalevaluationofrapidfluorescentdiagnosticimmunochromatographictestforinfluenzaavirush1n1 AT thitrinhthuytien clinicalevaluationofrapidfluorescentdiagnosticimmunochromatographictestforinfluenzaavirush1n1 AT yeoseonju clinicalevaluationofrapidfluorescentdiagnosticimmunochromatographictestforinfluenzaavirush1n1 |