Cargando…

Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: Tobacco harm reduction, substituting less harmful tobacco products for combustible cigarettes, is a complementary approach for smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke. The Philip Morris International (PMI) Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2 is a novel tobacco product with the potenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ansari, S Michael, Lama, Nicola, Blanc, Nicolas, Bosilkovska, Marija, Donelli, Andrea, Picavet, Patrick, Baker, Gizelle, Haziza, Christelle, Lüdicke, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30143474
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11294
_version_ 1783353731588292608
author Ansari, S Michael
Lama, Nicola
Blanc, Nicolas
Bosilkovska, Marija
Donelli, Andrea
Picavet, Patrick
Baker, Gizelle
Haziza, Christelle
Lüdicke, Frank
author_facet Ansari, S Michael
Lama, Nicola
Blanc, Nicolas
Bosilkovska, Marija
Donelli, Andrea
Picavet, Patrick
Baker, Gizelle
Haziza, Christelle
Lüdicke, Frank
author_sort Ansari, S Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tobacco harm reduction, substituting less harmful tobacco products for combustible cigarettes, is a complementary approach for smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke. The Philip Morris International (PMI) Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2 is a novel tobacco product with the potential to reduce the risk of harm in smokers compared to continued smoking of combustible cigarettes. It heats tobacco electrically in a controlled manner, never allowing the temperature to exceed 350°C, thereby preventing the combustion process from taking place and producing substantially lower levels of toxicants while providing nicotine, taste, ritual, and a sensory experience that closely parallels combustible cigarettes. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated reduced exposure to the toxicants (approaching the levels observed after quitting) for smokers who switched to THS 2.2, for three months. For adult smokers who would otherwise continue smoking combustible cigarettes, switching to THS 2.2 may represent an alternative way to reduce the risk of tobacco-related diseases. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to further substantiate the harm reduction potential of THS 2.2 by demonstrating favorable changes in a set of 8 coprimary endpoints, representative of pathomechanistic pathways (ie, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, respiratory function, and genotoxicity), linked to smoking-related diseases, in smokers switching from combustible cigarettes to THS 2.2. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, two-arm parallel group, multicenter ambulatory US study conducted in healthy adult smokers switching from combustible cigarettes to THS 2.2 compared with smokers continuing to smoke combustible cigarettes for six months. Subjects had a smoking history of at least ten years and did not intend to quit within the next six months. RESULTS: Enrollment started in March 2015 and the trial was completed in September 2016. In total, 984 subjects were randomized (combustible cigarettes, n=483; THS 2.2, n=477), and 803 completed the study. The results are expected to be available in a subsequent publication in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, we describe the rationale and design for this clinical study that focused on the evaluation of THS 2.2’s potential to reduce the risk of smoking-related diseases compared with that of combustible cigarettes. This study will provide insights regarding favorable changes in biological and functional endpoints informed by effects known to be seen upon smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02396381; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02396381 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/71PCRdagP) REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER: RR1-10.2196/11294
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6128954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61289542018-09-13 Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Ansari, S Michael Lama, Nicola Blanc, Nicolas Bosilkovska, Marija Donelli, Andrea Picavet, Patrick Baker, Gizelle Haziza, Christelle Lüdicke, Frank JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Tobacco harm reduction, substituting less harmful tobacco products for combustible cigarettes, is a complementary approach for smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke. The Philip Morris International (PMI) Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2 is a novel tobacco product with the potential to reduce the risk of harm in smokers compared to continued smoking of combustible cigarettes. It heats tobacco electrically in a controlled manner, never allowing the temperature to exceed 350°C, thereby preventing the combustion process from taking place and producing substantially lower levels of toxicants while providing nicotine, taste, ritual, and a sensory experience that closely parallels combustible cigarettes. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated reduced exposure to the toxicants (approaching the levels observed after quitting) for smokers who switched to THS 2.2, for three months. For adult smokers who would otherwise continue smoking combustible cigarettes, switching to THS 2.2 may represent an alternative way to reduce the risk of tobacco-related diseases. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to further substantiate the harm reduction potential of THS 2.2 by demonstrating favorable changes in a set of 8 coprimary endpoints, representative of pathomechanistic pathways (ie, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, respiratory function, and genotoxicity), linked to smoking-related diseases, in smokers switching from combustible cigarettes to THS 2.2. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, two-arm parallel group, multicenter ambulatory US study conducted in healthy adult smokers switching from combustible cigarettes to THS 2.2 compared with smokers continuing to smoke combustible cigarettes for six months. Subjects had a smoking history of at least ten years and did not intend to quit within the next six months. RESULTS: Enrollment started in March 2015 and the trial was completed in September 2016. In total, 984 subjects were randomized (combustible cigarettes, n=483; THS 2.2, n=477), and 803 completed the study. The results are expected to be available in a subsequent publication in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, we describe the rationale and design for this clinical study that focused on the evaluation of THS 2.2’s potential to reduce the risk of smoking-related diseases compared with that of combustible cigarettes. This study will provide insights regarding favorable changes in biological and functional endpoints informed by effects known to be seen upon smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02396381; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02396381 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/71PCRdagP) REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER: RR1-10.2196/11294 JMIR Publications 2018-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6128954/ /pubmed/30143474 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11294 Text en ©S Michael Ansari, Nicola Lama, Nicolas Blanc, Marija Bosilkovska, Andrea Donelli, Patrick Picavet, Gizelle Baker, Christelle Haziza, Frank Lüdicke. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 24.08.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Ansari, S Michael
Lama, Nicola
Blanc, Nicolas
Bosilkovska, Marija
Donelli, Andrea
Picavet, Patrick
Baker, Gizelle
Haziza, Christelle
Lüdicke, Frank
Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study
title Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study
title_full Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study
title_short Evaluation of Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers Switching to the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Versus Continued Tobacco Smoking: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study
title_sort evaluation of biological and functional changes in healthy smokers switching to the tobacco heating system 2.2 versus continued tobacco smoking: protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30143474
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11294
work_keys_str_mv AT ansarismichael evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT lamanicola evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT blancnicolas evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT bosilkovskamarija evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT donelliandrea evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT picavetpatrick evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT bakergizelle evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT hazizachristelle evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT ludickefrank evaluationofbiologicalandfunctionalchangesinhealthysmokersswitchingtothetobaccoheatingsystem22versuscontinuedtobaccosmokingprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudy