Cargando…

Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?

Despite many beneficial outcomes of the conventional enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), several limitations such as the high-cost of the treatment and various inadvertent side effects including the occurrence of an immunological response against the infused enzyme and development of resistance to enz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safary, Azam, Akbarzadeh Khiavi, Mostafa, Mousavi, Rahimeh, Barar, Jaleh, Rafi, Mohammad A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211074
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/bi.2018.17
_version_ 1783353734771769344
author Safary, Azam
Akbarzadeh Khiavi, Mostafa
Mousavi, Rahimeh
Barar, Jaleh
Rafi, Mohammad A.
author_facet Safary, Azam
Akbarzadeh Khiavi, Mostafa
Mousavi, Rahimeh
Barar, Jaleh
Rafi, Mohammad A.
author_sort Safary, Azam
collection PubMed
description Despite many beneficial outcomes of the conventional enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), several limitations such as the high-cost of the treatment and various inadvertent side effects including the occurrence of an immunological response against the infused enzyme and development of resistance to enzymes persist. These issues may limit the desired therapeutic outcomes of a majority of the lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). Furthermore, the biodistribution of the recombinant enzymes into the target cells within the central nervous system (CNS), bone, cartilage, cornea, and heart still remain unresolved. All these shortcomings necessitate the development of more effective diagnosis and treatment modalities against LSDs. Taken all, maximizing the therapeutic response with minimal undesired side effects might be attainable by the development of targeted enzyme delivery systems (EDSs) as a promising alternative to the LSDs treatments, including different types of mucopolysaccharidoses ( MPSs ) as well as Fabry, Krabbe, Gaucher and Pompe diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6128977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61289772018-09-12 Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option? Safary, Azam Akbarzadeh Khiavi, Mostafa Mousavi, Rahimeh Barar, Jaleh Rafi, Mohammad A. Bioimpacts Editorial Despite many beneficial outcomes of the conventional enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), several limitations such as the high-cost of the treatment and various inadvertent side effects including the occurrence of an immunological response against the infused enzyme and development of resistance to enzymes persist. These issues may limit the desired therapeutic outcomes of a majority of the lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). Furthermore, the biodistribution of the recombinant enzymes into the target cells within the central nervous system (CNS), bone, cartilage, cornea, and heart still remain unresolved. All these shortcomings necessitate the development of more effective diagnosis and treatment modalities against LSDs. Taken all, maximizing the therapeutic response with minimal undesired side effects might be attainable by the development of targeted enzyme delivery systems (EDSs) as a promising alternative to the LSDs treatments, including different types of mucopolysaccharidoses ( MPSs ) as well as Fabry, Krabbe, Gaucher and Pompe diseases. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6128977/ /pubmed/30211074 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/bi.2018.17 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) This work is published by BioImpacts as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Safary, Azam
Akbarzadeh Khiavi, Mostafa
Mousavi, Rahimeh
Barar, Jaleh
Rafi, Mohammad A.
Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
title Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
title_full Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
title_fullStr Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
title_full_unstemmed Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
title_short Enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
title_sort enzyme replacement therapies: what is the best option?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211074
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/bi.2018.17
work_keys_str_mv AT safaryazam enzymereplacementtherapieswhatisthebestoption
AT akbarzadehkhiavimostafa enzymereplacementtherapieswhatisthebestoption
AT mousavirahimeh enzymereplacementtherapieswhatisthebestoption
AT bararjaleh enzymereplacementtherapieswhatisthebestoption
AT rafimohammada enzymereplacementtherapieswhatisthebestoption