Cargando…

Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) produce tachycardia and hypertension that could be fatal in a patient with a brain injury. Bonfils fiberscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope are associated with little hemodynamic instability compared to DL. Scientific evidence comparing these two alternatives does...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ezhar, Youssef, D’Aragon, Frederick, Echave, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30193574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0592-7
_version_ 1783353740551520256
author Ezhar, Youssef
D’Aragon, Frederick
Echave, Pablo
author_facet Ezhar, Youssef
D’Aragon, Frederick
Echave, Pablo
author_sort Ezhar, Youssef
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) produce tachycardia and hypertension that could be fatal in a patient with a brain injury. Bonfils fiberscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope are associated with little hemodynamic instability compared to DL. Scientific evidence comparing these two alternatives does not exist. We conducted this study to determine the hemodynamic effects of Bonfils compared to C-MAC in patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: Fifty (50) patients listed for elective surgery were randomly assigned to endotracheal intubation with Bonfils or C-MAC. After a standardized induction, intubation was done via the retromolar approach (Bonfils group) or via videolaryngoscopy (C-MAC group). A research assistant, who was not blinded to the intervention, recorded heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure [MAP]) at induction and at every minute during the 5 min post intubation. The primary outcome was the hemodynamic response to intubation, as verified every minute for the first 5 min compared to baseline value. RESULTS: After randomization, the two groups were comparable except for ASA I/II ratio which was slightly higher in the C-MAC group (p = 0.046). Heart rate (p = 0.40) and MAP (p = 0.30) were comparable between the two groups within 5 min post intubation. Intubation time was shorter with C-MAC than with Bonfils (30 ± 2 s vs 38 ± 2 s; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation using the Bonfils fiberscope is comparable to the C-MAC videolaryngoscope among patients scheduled for an elective surgery. In light of these findings, using either technique appears to be a reasonable course of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN #34923, retrospectively registered, 26/03/2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0592-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6129002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61290022018-09-10 Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial Ezhar, Youssef D’Aragon, Frederick Echave, Pablo BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) produce tachycardia and hypertension that could be fatal in a patient with a brain injury. Bonfils fiberscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope are associated with little hemodynamic instability compared to DL. Scientific evidence comparing these two alternatives does not exist. We conducted this study to determine the hemodynamic effects of Bonfils compared to C-MAC in patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: Fifty (50) patients listed for elective surgery were randomly assigned to endotracheal intubation with Bonfils or C-MAC. After a standardized induction, intubation was done via the retromolar approach (Bonfils group) or via videolaryngoscopy (C-MAC group). A research assistant, who was not blinded to the intervention, recorded heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure [MAP]) at induction and at every minute during the 5 min post intubation. The primary outcome was the hemodynamic response to intubation, as verified every minute for the first 5 min compared to baseline value. RESULTS: After randomization, the two groups were comparable except for ASA I/II ratio which was slightly higher in the C-MAC group (p = 0.046). Heart rate (p = 0.40) and MAP (p = 0.30) were comparable between the two groups within 5 min post intubation. Intubation time was shorter with C-MAC than with Bonfils (30 ± 2 s vs 38 ± 2 s; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation using the Bonfils fiberscope is comparable to the C-MAC videolaryngoscope among patients scheduled for an elective surgery. In light of these findings, using either technique appears to be a reasonable course of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN #34923, retrospectively registered, 26/03/2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0592-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6129002/ /pubmed/30193574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0592-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ezhar, Youssef
D’Aragon, Frederick
Echave, Pablo
Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
title Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
title_full Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
title_short Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
title_sort hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with bonfils compared to c-mac videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30193574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0592-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ezharyoussef hemodynamicresponsestotrachealintubationwithbonfilscomparedtocmacvideolaryngoscopearandomizedtrial
AT daragonfrederick hemodynamicresponsestotrachealintubationwithbonfilscomparedtocmacvideolaryngoscopearandomizedtrial
AT echavepablo hemodynamicresponsestotrachealintubationwithbonfilscomparedtocmacvideolaryngoscopearandomizedtrial