Cargando…

A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management

BACKGROUND: Scholars have documented presumptions regarding the relationships between diet, exercise, weight, and type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear to what extent researchers contribute to these presumptions, and how often these relationships are thoroughly delineated within the context of ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riediger, Natalie D., Bombak, Andrea E., Mudryj, Adriana, Bensley, Jackson, Ankomah, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30193589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0390-6
_version_ 1783353741706002432
author Riediger, Natalie D.
Bombak, Andrea E.
Mudryj, Adriana
Bensley, Jackson
Ankomah, Samuel
author_facet Riediger, Natalie D.
Bombak, Andrea E.
Mudryj, Adriana
Bensley, Jackson
Ankomah, Samuel
author_sort Riediger, Natalie D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scholars have documented presumptions regarding the relationships between diet, exercise, weight, and type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear to what extent researchers contribute to these presumptions, and how often these relationships are thoroughly delineated within the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, the aim was to conduct a systematic search and qualitative, thematic analysis of RCTs focusing on lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention or management, to examine how researchers discuss body weight in 1) the rationale and design of their RCTs; and 2) their presentation and interpretation of their findings. METHODS: We completed an electronic search for records published between 2007 and November 2016. Selection criteria included: RCTs with a follow-up period of ≥12 months; adult participants with type 2 diabetes/pre-diabetes; lifestyle interventions classified as dietary, exercise, and/or behavioural; primary outcomes of incident diabetes and complications, mortality, cardiovascular disease, and quality of life; and secondary outcomes of glycemic control and blood pressure. Nineteen articles were identified for inclusion and subject to thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Obesity and weight loss figured prominently in the rationale and outcomes of the majority of the articles, despite intentional exclusion of “weight loss” and “obesity” as search terms. There was ambiguity over whether weight loss was classified as inclusive to the intervention, an outcome, or a measure of adherence. Results revealed that authors frequently engaged in “spin reporting” by pooling data from intervention and control groups to test the relationship between weight lost and outcomes and in their presentation of results. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers need to be aware of their biases and assumptions regarding body weight in designing, analyzing, and interpreting lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention and management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6129007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61290072018-09-10 A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management Riediger, Natalie D. Bombak, Andrea E. Mudryj, Adriana Bensley, Jackson Ankomah, Samuel Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: Scholars have documented presumptions regarding the relationships between diet, exercise, weight, and type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear to what extent researchers contribute to these presumptions, and how often these relationships are thoroughly delineated within the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, the aim was to conduct a systematic search and qualitative, thematic analysis of RCTs focusing on lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention or management, to examine how researchers discuss body weight in 1) the rationale and design of their RCTs; and 2) their presentation and interpretation of their findings. METHODS: We completed an electronic search for records published between 2007 and November 2016. Selection criteria included: RCTs with a follow-up period of ≥12 months; adult participants with type 2 diabetes/pre-diabetes; lifestyle interventions classified as dietary, exercise, and/or behavioural; primary outcomes of incident diabetes and complications, mortality, cardiovascular disease, and quality of life; and secondary outcomes of glycemic control and blood pressure. Nineteen articles were identified for inclusion and subject to thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Obesity and weight loss figured prominently in the rationale and outcomes of the majority of the articles, despite intentional exclusion of “weight loss” and “obesity” as search terms. There was ambiguity over whether weight loss was classified as inclusive to the intervention, an outcome, or a measure of adherence. Results revealed that authors frequently engaged in “spin reporting” by pooling data from intervention and control groups to test the relationship between weight lost and outcomes and in their presentation of results. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers need to be aware of their biases and assumptions regarding body weight in designing, analyzing, and interpreting lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention and management. BioMed Central 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6129007/ /pubmed/30193589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0390-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Riediger, Natalie D.
Bombak, Andrea E.
Mudryj, Adriana
Bensley, Jackson
Ankomah, Samuel
A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
title A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
title_full A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
title_fullStr A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
title_full_unstemmed A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
title_short A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
title_sort systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30193589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0390-6
work_keys_str_mv AT riedigernatalied asystematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT bombakandreae asystematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT mudryjadriana asystematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT bensleyjackson asystematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT ankomahsamuel asystematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT riedigernatalied systematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT bombakandreae systematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT mudryjadriana systematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT bensleyjackson systematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement
AT ankomahsamuel systematicsearchandqualitativereviewofreportingbiasoflifestyleinterventionsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofdiabetespreventionandmanagement