Cargando…

Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder

INTRODUCTION: Expert guidelines recommend cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) as a first-line treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), but the majority of patients with OCD do not have access to CBT. Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) has the potential to make this evidence-based treatment more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rück, Christian, Lundström, Lina, Flygare, Oskar, Enander, Jesper, Bottai, Matteo, Mataix-Cols, David, Andersson, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022254
_version_ 1783353751839440896
author Rück, Christian
Lundström, Lina
Flygare, Oskar
Enander, Jesper
Bottai, Matteo
Mataix-Cols, David
Andersson, Erik
author_facet Rück, Christian
Lundström, Lina
Flygare, Oskar
Enander, Jesper
Bottai, Matteo
Mataix-Cols, David
Andersson, Erik
author_sort Rück, Christian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Expert guidelines recommend cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) as a first-line treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), but the majority of patients with OCD do not have access to CBT. Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) has the potential to make this evidence-based treatment more accessible while requiring less therapist time than traditional face-to-face (f2f) CBT. Data from six clinical trials suggest that ICBT for OCD is both efficacious and cost-effective, but whether ICBT is non-inferior to traditional f2f CBT for OCD is yet unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing therapist-guided ICBT, unguided ICBT and individual (f2f) CBT for adult OCD patients. The primary objective is to investigate whether ICBT is non-inferior to gold standard f2f CBT. Secondary objectives are to investigate if ICBT is equally effective when delivered unguided, to establish the cost-effectiveness of ICBT and to investigate if the treatment outcome differs between self-referred and clinically referred patients. Participants will be recruited at two specialist OCD clinics in Stockholm and also through online self-referral. Participants will be randomised to one of three treatment conditions: F2f CBT, ICBT with therapist support or unguided ICBT. The total number of participants will be 120, and masked assessments will be administered at baseline, biweekly during treatment, at post-treatment and at 3-month and 12-month follow-ups. The main outcome measure is the clinician-rated Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) at 3-month follow-up. The margin of non-inferiority is set to 3 points on the Y-BOCS using a 90% CI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Board of Stockholm (REPN 2015/1099-31/2) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02541968). The study will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02541968; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6129083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61290832018-09-10 Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder Rück, Christian Lundström, Lina Flygare, Oskar Enander, Jesper Bottai, Matteo Mataix-Cols, David Andersson, Erik BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Expert guidelines recommend cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) as a first-line treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), but the majority of patients with OCD do not have access to CBT. Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) has the potential to make this evidence-based treatment more accessible while requiring less therapist time than traditional face-to-face (f2f) CBT. Data from six clinical trials suggest that ICBT for OCD is both efficacious and cost-effective, but whether ICBT is non-inferior to traditional f2f CBT for OCD is yet unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing therapist-guided ICBT, unguided ICBT and individual (f2f) CBT for adult OCD patients. The primary objective is to investigate whether ICBT is non-inferior to gold standard f2f CBT. Secondary objectives are to investigate if ICBT is equally effective when delivered unguided, to establish the cost-effectiveness of ICBT and to investigate if the treatment outcome differs between self-referred and clinically referred patients. Participants will be recruited at two specialist OCD clinics in Stockholm and also through online self-referral. Participants will be randomised to one of three treatment conditions: F2f CBT, ICBT with therapist support or unguided ICBT. The total number of participants will be 120, and masked assessments will be administered at baseline, biweekly during treatment, at post-treatment and at 3-month and 12-month follow-ups. The main outcome measure is the clinician-rated Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) at 3-month follow-up. The margin of non-inferiority is set to 3 points on the Y-BOCS using a 90% CI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Board of Stockholm (REPN 2015/1099-31/2) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02541968). The study will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02541968; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6129083/ /pubmed/30185575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022254 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Rück, Christian
Lundström, Lina
Flygare, Oskar
Enander, Jesper
Bottai, Matteo
Mataix-Cols, David
Andersson, Erik
Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
title Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_full Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_fullStr Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_short Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_sort study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022254
work_keys_str_mv AT ruckchristian studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT lundstromlina studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT flygareoskar studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT enanderjesper studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT bottaimatteo studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT mataixcolsdavid studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT anderssonerik studyprotocolforasingleblindrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrialofinternetbasedversusfacetofacecognitivebehaviourtherapyforobsessivecompulsivedisorder