Cargando…

Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To investigate men’s values and preferences regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and grey literature up to 2 September 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary studies of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vernooij, Robin W M, Lytvyn, Lyubov, Pardo-Hernandez, Hector, Albarqouni, Loai, Canelo-Aybar, Carlos, Campbell, Karen, Agoritsas, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025470
_version_ 1783353754791182336
author Vernooij, Robin W M
Lytvyn, Lyubov
Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
Albarqouni, Loai
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Campbell, Karen
Agoritsas, Thomas
author_facet Vernooij, Robin W M
Lytvyn, Lyubov
Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
Albarqouni, Loai
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Campbell, Karen
Agoritsas, Thomas
author_sort Vernooij, Robin W M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate men’s values and preferences regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and grey literature up to 2 September 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary studies of men’s values and preferences regarding the benefits and harms of PSA screening. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias with a modified version of a risk of bias tool for values and preferences studies, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument V.3 and the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RESULTS: We identified 4172 unique citations, of which 11 studies proved eligible. Five studies investigated PSA screening using a direct choice study design, whereas six used decisions aids displaying patient-important outcomes. The direct choice studies used different methodologies and varied considerably in the reporting of outcomes. Two studies suggested that men were willing to forego screening with a small benefit in prostate cancer mortality if it would decrease the likelihood of unnecessary treatment or biopsies. In contrast, one study reported that men were willing to accept a substantial overdiagnosis to reduce their risk of prostate cancer mortality. Among the six studies involving decision aids, willingness to undergo screening varied substantially from 37% when displaying a hypothetical reduction in mortality of 10 per 1000 men, to 44% when displaying a reduction in mortality of 7 per 1000. We found no studies that specifically investigated whether values and preferences differed among men with family history, of African descent or with lower socioeconomic levels. CONCLUSION: The variability of men’s values and preferences reflect that the decision to screen is highly preference sensitive. Our review highlights the need for shared decision making in men considering prostate cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018095585.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6129096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61290962018-09-10 Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review Vernooij, Robin W M Lytvyn, Lyubov Pardo-Hernandez, Hector Albarqouni, Loai Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Campbell, Karen Agoritsas, Thomas BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: To investigate men’s values and preferences regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and grey literature up to 2 September 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary studies of men’s values and preferences regarding the benefits and harms of PSA screening. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias with a modified version of a risk of bias tool for values and preferences studies, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument V.3 and the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RESULTS: We identified 4172 unique citations, of which 11 studies proved eligible. Five studies investigated PSA screening using a direct choice study design, whereas six used decisions aids displaying patient-important outcomes. The direct choice studies used different methodologies and varied considerably in the reporting of outcomes. Two studies suggested that men were willing to forego screening with a small benefit in prostate cancer mortality if it would decrease the likelihood of unnecessary treatment or biopsies. In contrast, one study reported that men were willing to accept a substantial overdiagnosis to reduce their risk of prostate cancer mortality. Among the six studies involving decision aids, willingness to undergo screening varied substantially from 37% when displaying a hypothetical reduction in mortality of 10 per 1000 men, to 44% when displaying a reduction in mortality of 7 per 1000. We found no studies that specifically investigated whether values and preferences differed among men with family history, of African descent or with lower socioeconomic levels. CONCLUSION: The variability of men’s values and preferences reflect that the decision to screen is highly preference sensitive. Our review highlights the need for shared decision making in men considering prostate cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018095585. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6129096/ /pubmed/30185585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025470 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Oncology
Vernooij, Robin W M
Lytvyn, Lyubov
Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
Albarqouni, Loai
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Campbell, Karen
Agoritsas, Thomas
Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
title Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_full Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_short Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_sort values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025470
work_keys_str_mv AT vernooijrobinwm valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT lytvynlyubov valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT pardohernandezhector valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT albarqouniloai valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT caneloaybarcarlos valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT campbellkaren valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT agoritsasthomas valuesandpreferencesofmenforundergoingprostatespecificantigenscreeningforprostatecancerasystematicreview