Cargando…
Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: We planned a c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30198053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5 |
_version_ | 1783353798042845184 |
---|---|
author | Zanatta, Mirko Benato, Piero De Battisti, Sigilfredo Pirozzi, Concetta Ippolito, Renato Cianci, Vito |
author_facet | Zanatta, Mirko Benato, Piero De Battisti, Sigilfredo Pirozzi, Concetta Ippolito, Renato Cianci, Vito |
author_sort | Zanatta, Mirko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: We planned a case-controlled study in the ULSS 5 ovest vicentino area (Vicenza—Italy) enrolling subjects with severe dyspnea caused by cardiac heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared drugs administration, oxygen delivery, and laboratory tests between those patients with ultrasound integrated management and those without ultrasound. RESULTS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound had a high specificity (94.4%) and sensitivity (100%) for the correct identification of alveolar interstitial syndrome using B lines, whereas the percentages obtained with pleural effusion were lower (83.3, 53.3%, respectively). The patients with ultrasound integrated management received a more appropriate pharmacological therapy (p 0.01), as well as non-invasive ventilation (CPAP) was used more frequently in those with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p 0.011). Laboratory tests and blood gases analysis were not significant different between the two study groups. In a sub-analysis of the patients with an A profile, we observed a significant lower concentration of PCO(2) in those with an ultrasound integrated management (PCO(2): 42.62 vs 52.23 p 0.049). According with physicians’ opinion, pre-hospital lung ultrasound gave important information or changed the therapy in the 42.3% of cases, whereas it just confirmed physical examination in the 67.7% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound is easy and feasible, and learning curve is rapid. Our study suggests that cardiac heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be considered two indications for pre-hospital ultrasound, and can improve the management of patient with acute respiratory insufficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6129457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61294572018-09-11 Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? Zanatta, Mirko Benato, Piero De Battisti, Sigilfredo Pirozzi, Concetta Ippolito, Renato Cianci, Vito Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: We planned a case-controlled study in the ULSS 5 ovest vicentino area (Vicenza—Italy) enrolling subjects with severe dyspnea caused by cardiac heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared drugs administration, oxygen delivery, and laboratory tests between those patients with ultrasound integrated management and those without ultrasound. RESULTS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound had a high specificity (94.4%) and sensitivity (100%) for the correct identification of alveolar interstitial syndrome using B lines, whereas the percentages obtained with pleural effusion were lower (83.3, 53.3%, respectively). The patients with ultrasound integrated management received a more appropriate pharmacological therapy (p 0.01), as well as non-invasive ventilation (CPAP) was used more frequently in those with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p 0.011). Laboratory tests and blood gases analysis were not significant different between the two study groups. In a sub-analysis of the patients with an A profile, we observed a significant lower concentration of PCO(2) in those with an ultrasound integrated management (PCO(2): 42.62 vs 52.23 p 0.049). According with physicians’ opinion, pre-hospital lung ultrasound gave important information or changed the therapy in the 42.3% of cases, whereas it just confirmed physical examination in the 67.7% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound is easy and feasible, and learning curve is rapid. Our study suggests that cardiac heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be considered two indications for pre-hospital ultrasound, and can improve the management of patient with acute respiratory insufficiency. Springer Milan 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6129457/ /pubmed/30198053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zanatta, Mirko Benato, Piero De Battisti, Sigilfredo Pirozzi, Concetta Ippolito, Renato Cianci, Vito Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? |
title | Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? |
title_full | Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? |
title_fullStr | Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? |
title_short | Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? |
title_sort | pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and copd: is it worthwhile? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30198053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zanattamirko prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile AT benatopiero prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile AT debattistisigilfredo prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile AT pirozziconcetta prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile AT ippolitorenato prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile AT ciancivito prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile |