Cargando…

Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: We planned a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanatta, Mirko, Benato, Piero, De Battisti, Sigilfredo, Pirozzi, Concetta, Ippolito, Renato, Cianci, Vito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30198053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5
_version_ 1783353798042845184
author Zanatta, Mirko
Benato, Piero
De Battisti, Sigilfredo
Pirozzi, Concetta
Ippolito, Renato
Cianci, Vito
author_facet Zanatta, Mirko
Benato, Piero
De Battisti, Sigilfredo
Pirozzi, Concetta
Ippolito, Renato
Cianci, Vito
author_sort Zanatta, Mirko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: We planned a case-controlled study in the ULSS 5 ovest vicentino area (Vicenza—Italy) enrolling subjects with severe dyspnea caused by cardiac heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared drugs administration, oxygen delivery, and laboratory tests between those patients with ultrasound integrated management and those without ultrasound. RESULTS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound had a high specificity (94.4%) and sensitivity (100%) for the correct identification of alveolar interstitial syndrome using B lines, whereas the percentages obtained with pleural effusion were lower (83.3, 53.3%, respectively). The patients with ultrasound integrated management received a more appropriate pharmacological therapy (p 0.01), as well as non-invasive ventilation (CPAP) was used more frequently in those with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p 0.011). Laboratory tests and blood gases analysis were not significant different between the two study groups. In a sub-analysis of the patients with an A profile, we observed a significant lower concentration of PCO(2) in those with an ultrasound integrated management (PCO(2): 42.62 vs 52.23 p 0.049). According with physicians’ opinion, pre-hospital lung ultrasound gave important information or changed the therapy in the 42.3% of cases, whereas it just confirmed physical examination in the 67.7% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound is easy and feasible, and learning curve is rapid. Our study suggests that cardiac heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be considered two indications for pre-hospital ultrasound, and can improve the management of patient with acute respiratory insufficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6129457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61294572018-09-11 Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile? Zanatta, Mirko Benato, Piero De Battisti, Sigilfredo Pirozzi, Concetta Ippolito, Renato Cianci, Vito Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital ultrasound is a new challenge and lung ultrasound could be an interesting opportunity in the pre-hospital medical service. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital non-traumatic respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: We planned a case-controlled study in the ULSS 5 ovest vicentino area (Vicenza—Italy) enrolling subjects with severe dyspnea caused by cardiac heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared drugs administration, oxygen delivery, and laboratory tests between those patients with ultrasound integrated management and those without ultrasound. RESULTS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound had a high specificity (94.4%) and sensitivity (100%) for the correct identification of alveolar interstitial syndrome using B lines, whereas the percentages obtained with pleural effusion were lower (83.3, 53.3%, respectively). The patients with ultrasound integrated management received a more appropriate pharmacological therapy (p 0.01), as well as non-invasive ventilation (CPAP) was used more frequently in those with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p 0.011). Laboratory tests and blood gases analysis were not significant different between the two study groups. In a sub-analysis of the patients with an A profile, we observed a significant lower concentration of PCO(2) in those with an ultrasound integrated management (PCO(2): 42.62 vs 52.23 p 0.049). According with physicians’ opinion, pre-hospital lung ultrasound gave important information or changed the therapy in the 42.3% of cases, whereas it just confirmed physical examination in the 67.7% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital lung ultrasound is easy and feasible, and learning curve is rapid. Our study suggests that cardiac heart failure and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be considered two indications for pre-hospital ultrasound, and can improve the management of patient with acute respiratory insufficiency. Springer Milan 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6129457/ /pubmed/30198053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zanatta, Mirko
Benato, Piero
De Battisti, Sigilfredo
Pirozzi, Concetta
Ippolito, Renato
Cianci, Vito
Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
title Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
title_full Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
title_fullStr Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
title_full_unstemmed Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
title_short Pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and COPD: is it worthwhile?
title_sort pre-hospital lung ultrasound for cardiac heart failure and copd: is it worthwhile?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30198053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0104-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zanattamirko prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile
AT benatopiero prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile
AT debattistisigilfredo prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile
AT pirozziconcetta prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile
AT ippolitorenato prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile
AT ciancivito prehospitallungultrasoundforcardiacheartfailureandcopdisitworthwhile