Cargando…
Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Anaphylaxis patients who visited ED from 2011 to 2013 were enrolled from three hospitals. We analyzed clinical features, prior history of anaphylaxis, management...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29277095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.024 |
_version_ | 1783353813297528832 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Mi-Yeong Park, Chan Sun Jeong, Jae-won |
author_facet | Kim, Mi-Yeong Park, Chan Sun Jeong, Jae-won |
author_sort | Kim, Mi-Yeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Anaphylaxis patients who visited ED from 2011 to 2013 were enrolled from three hospitals. We analyzed clinical features, prior history of anaphylaxis, management and provided education for etiology and/or prevention. For analyzing associated factors with epinephrine injection, Pearson chi-square test was used by SPSS version 21 (IBM Co.). RESULTS: A total of 194 anaphylaxis patients were enrolled. Ninety-nine patients (51%) visited ED by themselves. Time interval from symptom onset to ED visit was 62 ± 70.5 minutes. Drug (56.2%) was the most frequent cause of anaphylaxis. Forty-seven patients (24.2%) had prior history of anaphylaxis and 33 patients had same suspicious cause with current anaphylaxis. Cutaneous (88.7%) and respiratory (72.7%) symptoms were frequent. Hypotension was presented in 114 patients (58.8%). Mean observation time in ED was 12 ± 25.7 hours and epinephrine was injected in 114 patients (62%). In 68 patients, epinephrine was injected intramuscularly with mean dose of 0.3 ± 0.10 mg. Associated factor with epinephrine injection was hypotension (p = 0.000). Twenty-three patients (13%) were educated about avoidance of suspicious agent. Epinephrine auto-injectors were prescribed only in five patients. Only 34 (19%) and 72 (40%) patients were consulted to allergist at ED and outpatient allergy department respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that management and education of anaphylaxis were not fully carried out in ED. An education and promotion program on anaphylaxis is needed for medical staff. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6129625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61296252018-09-11 Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department Kim, Mi-Yeong Park, Chan Sun Jeong, Jae-won Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Anaphylaxis patients who visited ED from 2011 to 2013 were enrolled from three hospitals. We analyzed clinical features, prior history of anaphylaxis, management and provided education for etiology and/or prevention. For analyzing associated factors with epinephrine injection, Pearson chi-square test was used by SPSS version 21 (IBM Co.). RESULTS: A total of 194 anaphylaxis patients were enrolled. Ninety-nine patients (51%) visited ED by themselves. Time interval from symptom onset to ED visit was 62 ± 70.5 minutes. Drug (56.2%) was the most frequent cause of anaphylaxis. Forty-seven patients (24.2%) had prior history of anaphylaxis and 33 patients had same suspicious cause with current anaphylaxis. Cutaneous (88.7%) and respiratory (72.7%) symptoms were frequent. Hypotension was presented in 114 patients (58.8%). Mean observation time in ED was 12 ± 25.7 hours and epinephrine was injected in 114 patients (62%). In 68 patients, epinephrine was injected intramuscularly with mean dose of 0.3 ± 0.10 mg. Associated factor with epinephrine injection was hypotension (p = 0.000). Twenty-three patients (13%) were educated about avoidance of suspicious agent. Epinephrine auto-injectors were prescribed only in five patients. Only 34 (19%) and 72 (40%) patients were consulted to allergist at ED and outpatient allergy department respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that management and education of anaphylaxis were not fully carried out in ED. An education and promotion program on anaphylaxis is needed for medical staff. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2018-09 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6129625/ /pubmed/29277095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.024 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Mi-Yeong Park, Chan Sun Jeong, Jae-won Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
title | Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
title_full | Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
title_fullStr | Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
title_short | Management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
title_sort | management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29277095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmiyeong managementandeducationalstatusofadultanaphylaxispatientsatemergencydepartment AT parkchansun managementandeducationalstatusofadultanaphylaxispatientsatemergencydepartment AT jeongjaewon managementandeducationalstatusofadultanaphylaxispatientsatemergencydepartment |