Cargando…
Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: PubM...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30201790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3529 |
_version_ | 1783353855101108224 |
---|---|
author | Shen, Xian Zhao, Bin |
author_facet | Shen, Xian Zhao, Bin |
author_sort | Shen, Xian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS: Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS: 4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6129950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61299502018-09-12 Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis Shen, Xian Zhao, Bin BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS: Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS: 4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6129950/ /pubmed/30201790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3529 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Shen, Xian Zhao, Bin Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of pd-1 or pd-l1 inhibitors and pd-l1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30201790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenxian efficacyofpd1orpdl1inhibitorsandpdl1expressionstatusincancermetaanalysis AT zhaobin efficacyofpd1orpdl1inhibitorsandpdl1expressionstatusincancermetaanalysis |