Cargando…

A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients

INTRODUCTION: Diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS) is a treatment method used in respiratory failure occurs in diseases such as high-level cervical spinal cord injury, central hypoventilation syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients, who had undergone D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karacam, Volkan, Sanli, Aydin, Tertemiz, Kemal Can, Ulugun, Ilknur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6130177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319015
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_165_17
_version_ 1783353890832384000
author Karacam, Volkan
Sanli, Aydin
Tertemiz, Kemal Can
Ulugun, Ilknur
author_facet Karacam, Volkan
Sanli, Aydin
Tertemiz, Kemal Can
Ulugun, Ilknur
author_sort Karacam, Volkan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS) is a treatment method used in respiratory failure occurs in diseases such as high-level cervical spinal cord injury, central hypoventilation syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients, who had undergone DPS implantation surgery were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique (Group 1: classical surgical technic and Group 2: modified surgical technic) applied. The patients with previous abdominal surgery or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean operation duration was significantly shorter in modified DPS implantation technic (105.1 min in Group 1 and 87.4 min in Group 2) (P < 0.001). Capnothorax is seen 11% of the cases in classical surgery procedure. In the modified group, capnothorax was not observed. Pneumothorax rate was found similar in both groups. Post-operative atelectasis was determined 16% of the cases in classical surgery procedure and also in the modified group atelectasis was not observed. The complications were higher in classical surgery procedure group but not differed statistically in this study. Total hospitalisation duration was significantly shorter in the modified surgical technique group compared to the other group (8.0 days in Group 1 and 6.0 days in Group 2) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: With modification in DPS implantation surgery, shorter operation and hospitalisation durations, and less complications may be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6130177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61301772018-10-01 A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients Karacam, Volkan Sanli, Aydin Tertemiz, Kemal Can Ulugun, Ilknur J Minim Access Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS) is a treatment method used in respiratory failure occurs in diseases such as high-level cervical spinal cord injury, central hypoventilation syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients, who had undergone DPS implantation surgery were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique (Group 1: classical surgical technic and Group 2: modified surgical technic) applied. The patients with previous abdominal surgery or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean operation duration was significantly shorter in modified DPS implantation technic (105.1 min in Group 1 and 87.4 min in Group 2) (P < 0.001). Capnothorax is seen 11% of the cases in classical surgery procedure. In the modified group, capnothorax was not observed. Pneumothorax rate was found similar in both groups. Post-operative atelectasis was determined 16% of the cases in classical surgery procedure and also in the modified group atelectasis was not observed. The complications were higher in classical surgery procedure group but not differed statistically in this study. Total hospitalisation duration was significantly shorter in the modified surgical technique group compared to the other group (8.0 days in Group 1 and 6.0 days in Group 2) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: With modification in DPS implantation surgery, shorter operation and hospitalisation durations, and less complications may be achieved. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6130177/ /pubmed/29319015 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_165_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karacam, Volkan
Sanli, Aydin
Tertemiz, Kemal Can
Ulugun, Ilknur
A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients
title A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients
title_full A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients
title_fullStr A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients
title_full_unstemmed A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients
title_short A practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: Retrospective analyse of 43 patients
title_sort practical technique in laparoscopic diaphragm pacing surgery: retrospective analyse of 43 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6130177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319015
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_165_17
work_keys_str_mv AT karacamvolkan apracticaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT sanliaydin apracticaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT tertemizkemalcan apracticaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT ulugunilknur apracticaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT karacamvolkan practicaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT sanliaydin practicaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT tertemizkemalcan practicaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients
AT ulugunilknur practicaltechniqueinlaparoscopicdiaphragmpacingsurgeryretrospectiveanalyseof43patients