Cargando…
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has gained widespread acceptance for the management of complete rectal prolapse (CRP). However, there have been concerns considering its use in patients with a redundant sigmoid colon. This study was conducted to evaluate the anatomical and fu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6130185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29582793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_106_17 |
_version_ | 1783353892732403712 |
---|---|
author | Chandra, Abhijit Singh, Prabhu Kumar, Saket Chopra, Nikhil Gupta, Vishal Joshi, Pradeep Gupta, Vivek |
author_facet | Chandra, Abhijit Singh, Prabhu Kumar, Saket Chopra, Nikhil Gupta, Vishal Joshi, Pradeep Gupta, Vivek |
author_sort | Chandra, Abhijit |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has gained widespread acceptance for the management of complete rectal prolapse (CRP). However, there have been concerns considering its use in patients with a redundant sigmoid colon. This study was conducted to evaluate the anatomical and functional results following LVMR, particularly in cases of CRP with a redundant sigmoid colon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 25 patients who underwent LVMR from January 2011 to September 2016 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of follow-up. Group A (long-term) with follow-up >3 years and Group B (mid-term) <3 years. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients (M:F = 1.5:1) with a median age of 38 years. Eighty-eight percent of the patients had a redundant sigmoid colon. Significant improvement in post-operative Wexner score as compared to pre-operative values was seen in patients with pre-existing constipation (P < 0.0001). In patients presenting with faecal incontinence (FI), significant improvement in post-operative St. Mark's incontinence score was observed. Functional outcomes remain consistent in long-term follow-up (>3 years). CONCLUSIONS: LVMR seems to be a feasible surgical procedure with minimum morbidity and good long-term functional outcomes. It provides satisfactory results in patients with redundant sigmoid colon and improves pre-existing constipation and FI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6130185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61301852018-10-01 Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective Chandra, Abhijit Singh, Prabhu Kumar, Saket Chopra, Nikhil Gupta, Vishal Joshi, Pradeep Gupta, Vivek J Minim Access Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has gained widespread acceptance for the management of complete rectal prolapse (CRP). However, there have been concerns considering its use in patients with a redundant sigmoid colon. This study was conducted to evaluate the anatomical and functional results following LVMR, particularly in cases of CRP with a redundant sigmoid colon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 25 patients who underwent LVMR from January 2011 to September 2016 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of follow-up. Group A (long-term) with follow-up >3 years and Group B (mid-term) <3 years. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients (M:F = 1.5:1) with a median age of 38 years. Eighty-eight percent of the patients had a redundant sigmoid colon. Significant improvement in post-operative Wexner score as compared to pre-operative values was seen in patients with pre-existing constipation (P < 0.0001). In patients presenting with faecal incontinence (FI), significant improvement in post-operative St. Mark's incontinence score was observed. Functional outcomes remain consistent in long-term follow-up (>3 years). CONCLUSIONS: LVMR seems to be a feasible surgical procedure with minimum morbidity and good long-term functional outcomes. It provides satisfactory results in patients with redundant sigmoid colon and improves pre-existing constipation and FI. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6130185/ /pubmed/29582793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_106_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chandra, Abhijit Singh, Prabhu Kumar, Saket Chopra, Nikhil Gupta, Vishal Joshi, Pradeep Gupta, Vivek Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective |
title | Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective |
title_full | Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective |
title_short | Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: A viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – An Indian perspective |
title_sort | laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a viable option in procidentia with redundant sigmoid – an indian perspective |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6130185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29582793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_106_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandraabhijit laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective AT singhprabhu laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective AT kumarsaket laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective AT chopranikhil laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective AT guptavishal laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective AT joshipradeep laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective AT guptavivek laparoscopicventralrectopexyaviableoptioninprocidentiawithredundantsigmoidanindianperspective |