Cargando…

Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for rehabilitation after surgery. Many studies have compared different methods of postoperative pain management for open abdominal surgery. However, the conclusions were inconsistent and controversial. In addition, few studies have focused o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Liping, Li, Xuan, Chen, Hong, Liang, Jie, Wang, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6130278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30233231
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168892
_version_ 1783353910518349824
author Wang, Liping
Li, Xuan
Chen, Hong
Liang, Jie
Wang, Yu
author_facet Wang, Liping
Li, Xuan
Chen, Hong
Liang, Jie
Wang, Yu
author_sort Wang, Liping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for rehabilitation after surgery. Many studies have compared different methods of postoperative pain management for open abdominal surgery. However, the conclusions were inconsistent and controversial. In addition, few studies have focused on gastric cancer (GC) resection. This study aimed to determine the effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on postoperative pain management and short-term recovery after GC resection compared with those of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively collected data on patients with non-metastatic GC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection in a university hospital. PCIA and PCEA documented by the acute pain service team were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score-matched analysis that incorporated preoperative variables was used to compare the short-term outcomes between the PCIA and PCEA groups. RESULTS: In total, 3,042 patients were identified for analysis. Propensity score matching resulted in 917 patients in each group. The PCEA group exhibited lower pain scores in the recovery room and on the first and second postoperative days (P=0.0005, P=0.0065, and P=0.0034 respectively). The time to the first passage of flatus after surgery was shorter in the PCEA group than in the PCIA group (P=0.032). The length of the hospital stay was 12.6±7.2 and 11.8±6.6 days in the PCEA and PCIA groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the length of hospital stay or the incidence of complications after surgery. CONCLUSION: PCEA provided more effective postoperative pain management and a shorter time to the first passage of flatus than PCIA after GC resection. However, it did not have an effect on the length of hospital stay or the incidence of postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6130278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61302782018-09-19 Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015 Wang, Liping Li, Xuan Chen, Hong Liang, Jie Wang, Yu J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for rehabilitation after surgery. Many studies have compared different methods of postoperative pain management for open abdominal surgery. However, the conclusions were inconsistent and controversial. In addition, few studies have focused on gastric cancer (GC) resection. This study aimed to determine the effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on postoperative pain management and short-term recovery after GC resection compared with those of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively collected data on patients with non-metastatic GC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection in a university hospital. PCIA and PCEA documented by the acute pain service team were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score-matched analysis that incorporated preoperative variables was used to compare the short-term outcomes between the PCIA and PCEA groups. RESULTS: In total, 3,042 patients were identified for analysis. Propensity score matching resulted in 917 patients in each group. The PCEA group exhibited lower pain scores in the recovery room and on the first and second postoperative days (P=0.0005, P=0.0065, and P=0.0034 respectively). The time to the first passage of flatus after surgery was shorter in the PCEA group than in the PCIA group (P=0.032). The length of the hospital stay was 12.6±7.2 and 11.8±6.6 days in the PCEA and PCIA groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the length of hospital stay or the incidence of complications after surgery. CONCLUSION: PCEA provided more effective postoperative pain management and a shorter time to the first passage of flatus than PCIA after GC resection. However, it did not have an effect on the length of hospital stay or the incidence of postoperative complications. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6130278/ /pubmed/30233231 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168892 Text en © 2018 Wang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Liping
Li, Xuan
Chen, Hong
Liang, Jie
Wang, Yu
Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
title Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
title_full Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
title_fullStr Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
title_full_unstemmed Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
title_short Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
title_sort effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6130278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30233231
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168892
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliping effectofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaversuspatientcontrolledintravenousanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementandshorttermoutcomesaftergastriccancerresectionaretrospectiveanalysisof3042consecutivepatientsbetween2010and2015
AT lixuan effectofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaversuspatientcontrolledintravenousanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementandshorttermoutcomesaftergastriccancerresectionaretrospectiveanalysisof3042consecutivepatientsbetween2010and2015
AT chenhong effectofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaversuspatientcontrolledintravenousanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementandshorttermoutcomesaftergastriccancerresectionaretrospectiveanalysisof3042consecutivepatientsbetween2010and2015
AT liangjie effectofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaversuspatientcontrolledintravenousanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementandshorttermoutcomesaftergastriccancerresectionaretrospectiveanalysisof3042consecutivepatientsbetween2010and2015
AT wangyu effectofpatientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaversuspatientcontrolledintravenousanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementandshorttermoutcomesaftergastriccancerresectionaretrospectiveanalysisof3042consecutivepatientsbetween2010and2015