Cargando…
A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
Soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)) is commonly considered equal to soil CO(2) production (R(soil)), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R(soil) can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO(2) efflux...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x |
_version_ | 1783354049722056704 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Chorover, Jon |
author_facet | Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Chorover, Jon |
author_sort | Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)) is commonly considered equal to soil CO(2) production (R(soil)), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R(soil) can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO(2) efflux/O(2) influx, known as the apparent respiratory quotient (ARQ), enables new insights into CO(2) losses from R(soil) not previously captured by F(soil). We present the first study using continuous ARQ estimates to evaluate annual CO(2) losses of carbon produced from R(soil). We found that up to 1/3 of R(soil) was emitted directly to the atmosphere, whereas 2/3 of R(soil) was removed by subsurface processes. These subsurface losses are attributable to dissolution in water, biological activities and chemical reactions. Having better estimates of R(soil) is key to understanding the true influence of ecosystem production on R(soil), as well as the role of soil CO(2) production in other connected processes within the critical zone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6131168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61311682018-09-13 A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Chorover, Jon Sci Rep Article Soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)) is commonly considered equal to soil CO(2) production (R(soil)), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R(soil) can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO(2) efflux/O(2) influx, known as the apparent respiratory quotient (ARQ), enables new insights into CO(2) losses from R(soil) not previously captured by F(soil). We present the first study using continuous ARQ estimates to evaluate annual CO(2) losses of carbon produced from R(soil). We found that up to 1/3 of R(soil) was emitted directly to the atmosphere, whereas 2/3 of R(soil) was removed by subsurface processes. These subsurface losses are attributable to dissolution in water, biological activities and chemical reactions. Having better estimates of R(soil) is key to understanding the true influence of ecosystem production on R(soil), as well as the role of soil CO(2) production in other connected processes within the critical zone. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6131168/ /pubmed/30202073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Chorover, Jon A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
title | A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
title_full | A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
title_fullStr | A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
title_full_unstemmed | A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
title_short | A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
title_sort | considerable fraction of soil-respired co(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezcaneteenriquep aconsiderablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere AT barrongaffordgrega aconsiderablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere AT choroverjon aconsiderablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere AT sanchezcaneteenriquep considerablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere AT barrongaffordgrega considerablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere AT choroverjon considerablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere |