Cargando…

A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere

Soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)) is commonly considered equal to soil CO(2) production (R(soil)), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R(soil) can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO(2) efflux...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P., Barron-Gafford, Greg A., Chorover, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x
_version_ 1783354049722056704
author Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P.
Barron-Gafford, Greg A.
Chorover, Jon
author_facet Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P.
Barron-Gafford, Greg A.
Chorover, Jon
author_sort Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P.
collection PubMed
description Soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)) is commonly considered equal to soil CO(2) production (R(soil)), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R(soil) can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO(2) efflux/O(2) influx, known as the apparent respiratory quotient (ARQ), enables new insights into CO(2) losses from R(soil) not previously captured by F(soil). We present the first study using continuous ARQ estimates to evaluate annual CO(2) losses of carbon produced from R(soil). We found that up to 1/3 of R(soil) was emitted directly to the atmosphere, whereas 2/3 of R(soil) was removed by subsurface processes. These subsurface losses are attributable to dissolution in water, biological activities and chemical reactions. Having better estimates of R(soil) is key to understanding the true influence of ecosystem production on R(soil), as well as the role of soil CO(2) production in other connected processes within the critical zone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6131168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61311682018-09-13 A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Chorover, Jon Sci Rep Article Soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)) is commonly considered equal to soil CO(2) production (R(soil)), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R(soil) can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO(2) efflux/O(2) influx, known as the apparent respiratory quotient (ARQ), enables new insights into CO(2) losses from R(soil) not previously captured by F(soil). We present the first study using continuous ARQ estimates to evaluate annual CO(2) losses of carbon produced from R(soil). We found that up to 1/3 of R(soil) was emitted directly to the atmosphere, whereas 2/3 of R(soil) was removed by subsurface processes. These subsurface losses are attributable to dissolution in water, biological activities and chemical reactions. Having better estimates of R(soil) is key to understanding the true influence of ecosystem production on R(soil), as well as the role of soil CO(2) production in other connected processes within the critical zone. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6131168/ /pubmed/30202073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P.
Barron-Gafford, Greg A.
Chorover, Jon
A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
title A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
title_full A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
title_fullStr A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
title_full_unstemmed A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
title_short A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
title_sort considerable fraction of soil-respired co(2) is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezcaneteenriquep aconsiderablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere
AT barrongaffordgrega aconsiderablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere
AT choroverjon aconsiderablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere
AT sanchezcaneteenriquep considerablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere
AT barrongaffordgrega considerablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere
AT choroverjon considerablefractionofsoilrespiredco2isnotemitteddirectlytotheatmosphere