Cargando…
RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles published in four previo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ATHA EDITORA
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604168767 |
_version_ | 1783354071983325184 |
---|---|
author | de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara |
author_facet | de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara |
author_sort | de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles published in four previously selected journals. A score of journal evidence (RER - Relation between Randomized clinical trials and Systematic reviews) was calculated, considering the number of RCTs and SR published and the total number of full-text articles. RESULTS: The selected journals were JBJS-Am, ASMJ, BJJ-Br and Arthroscopy, with Impact factors of 5.280, 4.362, 3.309 and 3.206 respectively in 2015. In the study, the RER Scores, in the same order, were 9.408, 6.153, 7.456 and 7.779. CONCLUSION: The journal JBJS-Am is the best available source of information on orthopedic surgery from this point of view. It has the highest Impact Factor and clearly the highest RER Score. On the other hand, we could conclude that the number of published RCT and good quality SR is very low, with less than 10% of all the articles. Level of evidence III, Analyses based on limited alternatives and costs, and poor estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6131278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | ATHA EDITORA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61312782018-09-12 RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles published in four previously selected journals. A score of journal evidence (RER - Relation between Randomized clinical trials and Systematic reviews) was calculated, considering the number of RCTs and SR published and the total number of full-text articles. RESULTS: The selected journals were JBJS-Am, ASMJ, BJJ-Br and Arthroscopy, with Impact factors of 5.280, 4.362, 3.309 and 3.206 respectively in 2015. In the study, the RER Scores, in the same order, were 9.408, 6.153, 7.456 and 7.779. CONCLUSION: The journal JBJS-Am is the best available source of information on orthopedic surgery from this point of view. It has the highest Impact Factor and clearly the highest RER Score. On the other hand, we could conclude that the number of published RCT and good quality SR is very low, with less than 10% of all the articles. Level of evidence III, Analyses based on limited alternatives and costs, and poor estimates. ATHA EDITORA 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6131278/ /pubmed/30210260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604168767 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE |
title | RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE |
title_full | RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE |
title_fullStr | RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE |
title_full_unstemmed | RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE |
title_short | RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE |
title_sort | relation between impact factor in orthopedic journals and level of evidence |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604168767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debarrosmauriciopandinimonteiro relationbetweenimpactfactorinorthopedicjournalsandlevelofevidence AT matsunagafabioteruo relationbetweenimpactfactorinorthopedicjournalsandlevelofevidence AT tamaokimarceljunsugawara relationbetweenimpactfactorinorthopedicjournalsandlevelofevidence |