Cargando…

RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles published in four previo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro, Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo, Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604168767
_version_ 1783354071983325184
author de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro
Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
author_facet de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro
Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
author_sort de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles published in four previously selected journals. A score of journal evidence (RER - Relation between Randomized clinical trials and Systematic reviews) was calculated, considering the number of RCTs and SR published and the total number of full-text articles. RESULTS: The selected journals were JBJS-Am, ASMJ, BJJ-Br and Arthroscopy, with Impact factors of 5.280, 4.362, 3.309 and 3.206 respectively in 2015. In the study, the RER Scores, in the same order, were 9.408, 6.153, 7.456 and 7.779. CONCLUSION: The journal JBJS-Am is the best available source of information on orthopedic surgery from this point of view. It has the highest Impact Factor and clearly the highest RER Score. On the other hand, we could conclude that the number of published RCT and good quality SR is very low, with less than 10% of all the articles. Level of evidence III, Analyses based on limited alternatives and costs, and poor estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6131278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61312782018-09-12 RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality of articles published in the leading orthopedic surgery journals, by measuring the relation between the impact factor and the number studies with a high level of evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed of articles published in four previously selected journals. A score of journal evidence (RER - Relation between Randomized clinical trials and Systematic reviews) was calculated, considering the number of RCTs and SR published and the total number of full-text articles. RESULTS: The selected journals were JBJS-Am, ASMJ, BJJ-Br and Arthroscopy, with Impact factors of 5.280, 4.362, 3.309 and 3.206 respectively in 2015. In the study, the RER Scores, in the same order, were 9.408, 6.153, 7.456 and 7.779. CONCLUSION: The journal JBJS-Am is the best available source of information on orthopedic surgery from this point of view. It has the highest Impact Factor and clearly the highest RER Score. On the other hand, we could conclude that the number of published RCT and good quality SR is very low, with less than 10% of all the articles. Level of evidence III, Analyses based on limited alternatives and costs, and poor estimates. ATHA EDITORA 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6131278/ /pubmed/30210260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604168767 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Barros, Mauricio Pandini Monteiro
Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
title RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
title_full RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
title_fullStr RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
title_full_unstemmed RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
title_short RELATION BETWEEN IMPACT FACTOR IN ORTHOPEDIC JOURNALS AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
title_sort relation between impact factor in orthopedic journals and level of evidence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604168767
work_keys_str_mv AT debarrosmauriciopandinimonteiro relationbetweenimpactfactorinorthopedicjournalsandlevelofevidence
AT matsunagafabioteruo relationbetweenimpactfactorinorthopedicjournalsandlevelofevidence
AT tamaokimarceljunsugawara relationbetweenimpactfactorinorthopedicjournalsandlevelofevidence