Cargando…

BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the side of application of the plate itself affects the mechanical stability of the fixation. The specific question addressed is whether or not a lateral or medial plate application is biomechanically better, for the treatment of dista...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al, Firat, Tosun, Bilgehan, Sinmazcelik, Tamer, Ozmen, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604191645
_version_ 1783354072862031872
author Al, Firat
Tosun, Bilgehan
Sinmazcelik, Tamer
Ozmen, Mustafa
author_facet Al, Firat
Tosun, Bilgehan
Sinmazcelik, Tamer
Ozmen, Mustafa
author_sort Al, Firat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the side of application of the plate itself affects the mechanical stability of the fixation. The specific question addressed is whether or not a lateral or medial plate application is biomechanically better, for the treatment of distal diaphysis fractures of the femur. METHODS: Stability and stiffness of medial sided plating relative to the conventional lateral sided plating in distal diaphysis of the femur were measured by analyzing axial loading forces leading to implant failure. Sixty synthetic femurs were tested in physiological bending, to calculate the yield and ultimate load to displacement following fixation of distal diaphysis fractures of the femur by either medial or lateral sided plating. Axial loading was applied to samples using a uniaxial testing machine. RESULTS: There was more implant deformation in the lateral sided plating group – a difference with statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Medial sided plating was found to be as stiff as lateral plating. Medial plating may be a reasonable treatment option that can be used safely in selected cases. Level of Evidence I, Therapeutic Studies Investigating the Results of Treatment
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6131281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61312812018-09-12 BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES Al, Firat Tosun, Bilgehan Sinmazcelik, Tamer Ozmen, Mustafa Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the side of application of the plate itself affects the mechanical stability of the fixation. The specific question addressed is whether or not a lateral or medial plate application is biomechanically better, for the treatment of distal diaphysis fractures of the femur. METHODS: Stability and stiffness of medial sided plating relative to the conventional lateral sided plating in distal diaphysis of the femur were measured by analyzing axial loading forces leading to implant failure. Sixty synthetic femurs were tested in physiological bending, to calculate the yield and ultimate load to displacement following fixation of distal diaphysis fractures of the femur by either medial or lateral sided plating. Axial loading was applied to samples using a uniaxial testing machine. RESULTS: There was more implant deformation in the lateral sided plating group – a difference with statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Medial sided plating was found to be as stiff as lateral plating. Medial plating may be a reasonable treatment option that can be used safely in selected cases. Level of Evidence I, Therapeutic Studies Investigating the Results of Treatment ATHA EDITORA 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6131281/ /pubmed/30210258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604191645 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Al, Firat
Tosun, Bilgehan
Sinmazcelik, Tamer
Ozmen, Mustafa
BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES
title BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES
title_full BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES
title_fullStr BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES
title_full_unstemmed BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES
title_short BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIAL VERSUS LATERAL SIDED PLATING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES
title_sort biomechanical comparison of medial versus lateral sided plating in femoral fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182604191645
work_keys_str_mv AT alfirat biomechanicalcomparisonofmedialversuslateralsidedplatinginfemoralfractures
AT tosunbilgehan biomechanicalcomparisonofmedialversuslateralsidedplatinginfemoralfractures
AT sinmazceliktamer biomechanicalcomparisonofmedialversuslateralsidedplatinginfemoralfractures
AT ozmenmustafa biomechanicalcomparisonofmedialversuslateralsidedplatinginfemoralfractures