Cargando…
Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
BACKGROUND: In the currently published literature, a higher risk for developing arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been reported for female patients, adolescents, early surgery or concomitant procedures, and the use of a patellar tendon autograft. There is a lac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118794490 |
_version_ | 1783354080432750592 |
---|---|
author | Huleatt, Joel Gottschalk, Michael Fraser, Kelsey Boden, Allison Dalwadi, Poonam Xerogeanes, John Hammond, Kyle |
author_facet | Huleatt, Joel Gottschalk, Michael Fraser, Kelsey Boden, Allison Dalwadi, Poonam Xerogeanes, John Hammond, Kyle |
author_sort | Huleatt, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the currently published literature, a higher risk for developing arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been reported for female patients, adolescents, early surgery or concomitant procedures, and the use of a patellar tendon autograft. There is a lack of evidence regarding other graft choices or factors. HYPOTHESIS: Multiple risk factors will play a significant role in the development of arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Specifically, we hypothesized that the risk of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and/or lysis of adhesions (LOA) would be affected by graft choice and patient demographic factors. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The charts of all patients who underwent ACL reconstruction over a 10-year period at a single academic institution were queried from an electronic medical record database and reviewed at a minimum of 6 months after ACL reconstruction, with the collection of demographic and surgical data. The relative risk for undergoing MUA and/or LOA was calculated for each analyzed risk factor. RESULTS: A total of 2424 ACL reconstructions were included, with a chart review at a mean of 56.7 months after surgery (range, 7.6-124.0 months). The rate of MUA and/or LOA for arthrofibrosis was 4.5%. A statistically significantly increased relative risk was found for infection (5.45), hematoma requiring evacuation (3.55), ACL reconstruction with meniscal repair (2.83), use of a quadriceps tendon autograft (2.68), age <18 years (2.39), multiple concomitant procedures (1.69), contact injury (1.62), female sex (1.60), and surgery within 28 days of injury (1.53), and a statistically significantly decreased relative risk was found for revision ACL reconstruction (0.30), age >25 years (0.34), and use of a tibialis anterior allograft (0.36). In the multivariate regression model, the use of a quadriceps tendon autograft (P = .00007), infection (P = .00126), and concomitant meniscal repair (P = .00194) were independent risk factors, whereas revision ACL reconstruction (P = .0024) was an independent protective factor. CONCLUSION: Graft type, infection, concomitant meniscal repair, and primary reconstruction are significant risk factors for undergoing MUA or LOA after ACL reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6131313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61313132018-09-12 Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Huleatt, Joel Gottschalk, Michael Fraser, Kelsey Boden, Allison Dalwadi, Poonam Xerogeanes, John Hammond, Kyle Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: In the currently published literature, a higher risk for developing arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been reported for female patients, adolescents, early surgery or concomitant procedures, and the use of a patellar tendon autograft. There is a lack of evidence regarding other graft choices or factors. HYPOTHESIS: Multiple risk factors will play a significant role in the development of arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Specifically, we hypothesized that the risk of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and/or lysis of adhesions (LOA) would be affected by graft choice and patient demographic factors. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The charts of all patients who underwent ACL reconstruction over a 10-year period at a single academic institution were queried from an electronic medical record database and reviewed at a minimum of 6 months after ACL reconstruction, with the collection of demographic and surgical data. The relative risk for undergoing MUA and/or LOA was calculated for each analyzed risk factor. RESULTS: A total of 2424 ACL reconstructions were included, with a chart review at a mean of 56.7 months after surgery (range, 7.6-124.0 months). The rate of MUA and/or LOA for arthrofibrosis was 4.5%. A statistically significantly increased relative risk was found for infection (5.45), hematoma requiring evacuation (3.55), ACL reconstruction with meniscal repair (2.83), use of a quadriceps tendon autograft (2.68), age <18 years (2.39), multiple concomitant procedures (1.69), contact injury (1.62), female sex (1.60), and surgery within 28 days of injury (1.53), and a statistically significantly decreased relative risk was found for revision ACL reconstruction (0.30), age >25 years (0.34), and use of a tibialis anterior allograft (0.36). In the multivariate regression model, the use of a quadriceps tendon autograft (P = .00007), infection (P = .00126), and concomitant meniscal repair (P = .00194) were independent risk factors, whereas revision ACL reconstruction (P = .0024) was an independent protective factor. CONCLUSION: Graft type, infection, concomitant meniscal repair, and primary reconstruction are significant risk factors for undergoing MUA or LOA after ACL reconstruction. SAGE Publications 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6131313/ /pubmed/30211246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118794490 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Huleatt, Joel Gottschalk, Michael Fraser, Kelsey Boden, Allison Dalwadi, Poonam Xerogeanes, John Hammond, Kyle Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title | Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of
Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full | Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of
Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of
Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of
Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_short | Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of
Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_sort | risk factors for manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of
adhesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118794490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huleattjoel riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT gottschalkmichael riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT fraserkelsey riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT bodenallison riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT dalwadipoonam riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT xerogeanesjohn riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT hammondkyle riskfactorsformanipulationunderanesthesiaandorlysisofadhesionsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction |