Cargando…

Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy

BACKGROUND: Venous stenting with an endophlebectomy and arteriovenous fistula can be performed in patients with extensive post-thrombotic changes. However, these hybrid procedures can induce restenosis, sometimes requiring stent extension, into a single inflow vessel. This study investigates the eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Vuuren, Timme MAJ, Kurstjens, Ralph LM, de Wolf, Mark AF, van Laanen, Jorinde HH, Wittens, Cees HA, de Graaf, Rick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355517739766
_version_ 1783354178744090624
author van Vuuren, Timme MAJ
Kurstjens, Ralph LM
de Wolf, Mark AF
van Laanen, Jorinde HH
Wittens, Cees HA
de Graaf, Rick
author_facet van Vuuren, Timme MAJ
Kurstjens, Ralph LM
de Wolf, Mark AF
van Laanen, Jorinde HH
Wittens, Cees HA
de Graaf, Rick
author_sort van Vuuren, Timme MAJ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous stenting with an endophlebectomy and arteriovenous fistula can be performed in patients with extensive post-thrombotic changes. However, these hybrid procedures can induce restenosis, sometimes requiring stent extension, into a single inflow vessel. This study investigates the effectiveness of stenting into a single inflow vessel. METHODS: All evaluated patients had temporary balloon occlusion of the arteriovenous fistula to evaluate venous flow into the stents. When stent inflow was deemed insufficient, AVF closure was postponed and additional stenting was performed. Patency rates and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four (38%) of 64 patients had additional stenting. The primary, assisted primary and secondary patency were 60 %, 70% and 70% respectively. Villalta score reduced by 6.1 points (p < 0.001), and venous clinical severity score by 2.7 points (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Stenting through the femoral confluence into a single inflow vessel is a feasible bailout option if primary hybrid intervention fails with relative high patency rates and clinical improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6131728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61317282018-09-25 Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy van Vuuren, Timme MAJ Kurstjens, Ralph LM de Wolf, Mark AF van Laanen, Jorinde HH Wittens, Cees HA de Graaf, Rick Phlebology Original Articles BACKGROUND: Venous stenting with an endophlebectomy and arteriovenous fistula can be performed in patients with extensive post-thrombotic changes. However, these hybrid procedures can induce restenosis, sometimes requiring stent extension, into a single inflow vessel. This study investigates the effectiveness of stenting into a single inflow vessel. METHODS: All evaluated patients had temporary balloon occlusion of the arteriovenous fistula to evaluate venous flow into the stents. When stent inflow was deemed insufficient, AVF closure was postponed and additional stenting was performed. Patency rates and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four (38%) of 64 patients had additional stenting. The primary, assisted primary and secondary patency were 60 %, 70% and 70% respectively. Villalta score reduced by 6.1 points (p < 0.001), and venous clinical severity score by 2.7 points (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Stenting through the femoral confluence into a single inflow vessel is a feasible bailout option if primary hybrid intervention fails with relative high patency rates and clinical improvement. SAGE Publications 2017-11-07 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6131728/ /pubmed/29113541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355517739766 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Vuuren, Timme MAJ
Kurstjens, Ralph LM
de Wolf, Mark AF
van Laanen, Jorinde HH
Wittens, Cees HA
de Graaf, Rick
Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
title Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
title_full Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
title_fullStr Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
title_full_unstemmed Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
title_short Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
title_sort stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355517739766
work_keys_str_mv AT vanvuurentimmemaj stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy
AT kurstjensralphlm stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy
AT dewolfmarkaf stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy
AT vanlaanenjorindehh stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy
AT wittensceesha stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy
AT degraafrick stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy