Cargando…
Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy
BACKGROUND: Venous stenting with an endophlebectomy and arteriovenous fistula can be performed in patients with extensive post-thrombotic changes. However, these hybrid procedures can induce restenosis, sometimes requiring stent extension, into a single inflow vessel. This study investigates the eff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355517739766 |
_version_ | 1783354178744090624 |
---|---|
author | van Vuuren, Timme MAJ Kurstjens, Ralph LM de Wolf, Mark AF van Laanen, Jorinde HH Wittens, Cees HA de Graaf, Rick |
author_facet | van Vuuren, Timme MAJ Kurstjens, Ralph LM de Wolf, Mark AF van Laanen, Jorinde HH Wittens, Cees HA de Graaf, Rick |
author_sort | van Vuuren, Timme MAJ |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Venous stenting with an endophlebectomy and arteriovenous fistula can be performed in patients with extensive post-thrombotic changes. However, these hybrid procedures can induce restenosis, sometimes requiring stent extension, into a single inflow vessel. This study investigates the effectiveness of stenting into a single inflow vessel. METHODS: All evaluated patients had temporary balloon occlusion of the arteriovenous fistula to evaluate venous flow into the stents. When stent inflow was deemed insufficient, AVF closure was postponed and additional stenting was performed. Patency rates and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four (38%) of 64 patients had additional stenting. The primary, assisted primary and secondary patency were 60 %, 70% and 70% respectively. Villalta score reduced by 6.1 points (p < 0.001), and venous clinical severity score by 2.7 points (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Stenting through the femoral confluence into a single inflow vessel is a feasible bailout option if primary hybrid intervention fails with relative high patency rates and clinical improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6131728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61317282018-09-25 Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy van Vuuren, Timme MAJ Kurstjens, Ralph LM de Wolf, Mark AF van Laanen, Jorinde HH Wittens, Cees HA de Graaf, Rick Phlebology Original Articles BACKGROUND: Venous stenting with an endophlebectomy and arteriovenous fistula can be performed in patients with extensive post-thrombotic changes. However, these hybrid procedures can induce restenosis, sometimes requiring stent extension, into a single inflow vessel. This study investigates the effectiveness of stenting into a single inflow vessel. METHODS: All evaluated patients had temporary balloon occlusion of the arteriovenous fistula to evaluate venous flow into the stents. When stent inflow was deemed insufficient, AVF closure was postponed and additional stenting was performed. Patency rates and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four (38%) of 64 patients had additional stenting. The primary, assisted primary and secondary patency were 60 %, 70% and 70% respectively. Villalta score reduced by 6.1 points (p < 0.001), and venous clinical severity score by 2.7 points (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Stenting through the femoral confluence into a single inflow vessel is a feasible bailout option if primary hybrid intervention fails with relative high patency rates and clinical improvement. SAGE Publications 2017-11-07 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6131728/ /pubmed/29113541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355517739766 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles van Vuuren, Timme MAJ Kurstjens, Ralph LM de Wolf, Mark AF van Laanen, Jorinde HH Wittens, Cees HA de Graaf, Rick Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option after endophlebectomy |
title | Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option
after endophlebectomy |
title_full | Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option
after endophlebectomy |
title_fullStr | Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option
after endophlebectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option
after endophlebectomy |
title_short | Stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option
after endophlebectomy |
title_sort | stent extension into a single inflow vessel is a valuable option
after endophlebectomy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355517739766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanvuurentimmemaj stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy AT kurstjensralphlm stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy AT dewolfmarkaf stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy AT vanlaanenjorindehh stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy AT wittensceesha stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy AT degraafrick stentextensionintoasingleinflowvesselisavaluableoptionafterendophlebectomy |