Cargando…
Planning comparison of five automated treatment planning solutions for locally advanced head and neck cancer
BACKGROUND: Automated treatment planning and/or optimization systems (ATPS) are in the process of broad clinical implementation aiming at reducing inter-planner variability, reducing the planning time allocated for the optimization process and improving plan quality. Five different ATPS used clinica...
Autores principales: | Krayenbuehl, J., Zamburlini, M., Ghandour, S., Pachoud, M., Lang-Tanadini, S., Tol, J., Guckenberger, M., Verbakel, W. F. A. R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30201017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1113-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to: Planning comparison of five automated treatment planning solutions for locally advanced head and neck cancer
por: Krayenbuehl, J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck
por: Krayenbuehl, Jerome, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Head and neck radiotherapy on the MR linac: a multicenter planning challenge amongst MRIdian platform users
por: Chamberlain, Madalyne, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Treatment plan quality during online adaptive re-planning
por: van Timmeren, Janita E., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Improved plan quality with automated radiotherapy planning for whole brain with hippocampus sparing: a comparison to the RTOG 0933 trial
por: Krayenbuehl, J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)