Cargando…

Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review

There is a growing interest in assessing dietary intake more accurately across different population groups, and biomarkers have emerged as a complementary tool to replace traditional dietary assessment methods. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature available...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C., Wahab, Roshaida Abdul, Aloy, Mar Garcia, Madrid-Gambin, Francisco, Estruel-Amades, Sheila, Watzl, Bernhard, Andrés-Lacueva, Cristina, Brennan, Lorraine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-018-0614-6
_version_ 1783354184099168256
author Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
Wahab, Roshaida Abdul
Aloy, Mar Garcia
Madrid-Gambin, Francisco
Estruel-Amades, Sheila
Watzl, Bernhard
Andrés-Lacueva, Cristina
Brennan, Lorraine
author_facet Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
Wahab, Roshaida Abdul
Aloy, Mar Garcia
Madrid-Gambin, Francisco
Estruel-Amades, Sheila
Watzl, Bernhard
Andrés-Lacueva, Cristina
Brennan, Lorraine
author_sort Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
collection PubMed
description There is a growing interest in assessing dietary intake more accurately across different population groups, and biomarkers have emerged as a complementary tool to replace traditional dietary assessment methods. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature available and evaluate the applicability and validity of biomarkers of legume intake reported across various observational and intervention studies. A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge identified 44 studies which met the inclusion criteria for the review. Results from observational studies focused on soy or soy-based foods and demonstrated positive correlations between soy intake and urinary, plasma or serum isoflavonoid levels in different population groups. Similarly, intervention studies demonstrated increased genistein and daidzein levels in urine and plasma following soy intake. Both genistein and daidzein exhibited dose-response relationships. Other isoflavonoid levels such as O-desmethylangolensin (O-DMA) and equol were also reported to increase following soy consumption. Using a developed scoring system, genistein and daidzein can be considered as promising candidate markers for soy consumption. Furthermore, genistein and daidzein also served as good estimates of soy intake as evidenced from long-term exposure studies marking their status as validated biomarkers. On the contrary, only few studies indicated proposed biomarkers for pulses intake, with pipecolic acid and S-methylcysteine reported as markers reflecting dry bean consumption, unsaturated aliphatic, hydroxyl-dicarboxylic acid related to green beans intake and trigonelline reported as marker of peas consumption. However, data regarding criteria such as specificity, dose-response and time-response relationship, reliability, and feasibility to evaluate the validity of these markers is lacking. In conclusion, despite many studies suggesting proposed biomarkers for soy, there is a lack of information on markers of other different subtypes of legumes. Further discovery and validation studies are needed in order to identify reliable biomarkers of legume intake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12263-018-0614-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6131749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61317492018-09-13 Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C. Wahab, Roshaida Abdul Aloy, Mar Garcia Madrid-Gambin, Francisco Estruel-Amades, Sheila Watzl, Bernhard Andrés-Lacueva, Cristina Brennan, Lorraine Genes Nutr Review There is a growing interest in assessing dietary intake more accurately across different population groups, and biomarkers have emerged as a complementary tool to replace traditional dietary assessment methods. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature available and evaluate the applicability and validity of biomarkers of legume intake reported across various observational and intervention studies. A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge identified 44 studies which met the inclusion criteria for the review. Results from observational studies focused on soy or soy-based foods and demonstrated positive correlations between soy intake and urinary, plasma or serum isoflavonoid levels in different population groups. Similarly, intervention studies demonstrated increased genistein and daidzein levels in urine and plasma following soy intake. Both genistein and daidzein exhibited dose-response relationships. Other isoflavonoid levels such as O-desmethylangolensin (O-DMA) and equol were also reported to increase following soy consumption. Using a developed scoring system, genistein and daidzein can be considered as promising candidate markers for soy consumption. Furthermore, genistein and daidzein also served as good estimates of soy intake as evidenced from long-term exposure studies marking their status as validated biomarkers. On the contrary, only few studies indicated proposed biomarkers for pulses intake, with pipecolic acid and S-methylcysteine reported as markers reflecting dry bean consumption, unsaturated aliphatic, hydroxyl-dicarboxylic acid related to green beans intake and trigonelline reported as marker of peas consumption. However, data regarding criteria such as specificity, dose-response and time-response relationship, reliability, and feasibility to evaluate the validity of these markers is lacking. In conclusion, despite many studies suggesting proposed biomarkers for soy, there is a lack of information on markers of other different subtypes of legumes. Further discovery and validation studies are needed in order to identify reliable biomarkers of legume intake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12263-018-0614-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6131749/ /pubmed/30214640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-018-0614-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Sri Harsha, Pedapati S. C.
Wahab, Roshaida Abdul
Aloy, Mar Garcia
Madrid-Gambin, Francisco
Estruel-Amades, Sheila
Watzl, Bernhard
Andrés-Lacueva, Cristina
Brennan, Lorraine
Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
title Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
title_full Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
title_fullStr Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
title_short Biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
title_sort biomarkers of legume intake in human intervention and observational studies: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-018-0614-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sriharshapedapatisc biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT wahabroshaidaabdul biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT aloymargarcia biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT madridgambinfrancisco biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT estruelamadessheila biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT watzlbernhard biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT andreslacuevacristina biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview
AT brennanlorraine biomarkersoflegumeintakeinhumaninterventionandobservationalstudiesasystematicreview