Cargando…

In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment

PURPOSE: Wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs) associated with a dilated parent artery (PA) are not uncommon morphological abnormalities and usually cause inappropriate wall apposition and incomplete neck coverage of a tubular stent in stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms. We aimed to introduce a fusiform-shape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Zhen Yu, Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Woo, Jung Min, Hwang, Seon Moon, Lim, Ok Kyun, Kim, Tae Il, Park, Jung Cheol, Lee, Hee Sun, Kim, Eun Sang, Lee, Deok Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196682
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2018.00976
_version_ 1783354246960250880
author Jia, Zhen Yu
Jiang, Yuan Yuan
Woo, Jung Min
Hwang, Seon Moon
Lim, Ok Kyun
Kim, Tae Il
Park, Jung Cheol
Lee, Hee Sun
Kim, Eun Sang
Lee, Deok Hee
author_facet Jia, Zhen Yu
Jiang, Yuan Yuan
Woo, Jung Min
Hwang, Seon Moon
Lim, Ok Kyun
Kim, Tae Il
Park, Jung Cheol
Lee, Hee Sun
Kim, Eun Sang
Lee, Deok Hee
author_sort Jia, Zhen Yu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs) associated with a dilated parent artery (PA) are not uncommon morphological abnormalities and usually cause inappropriate wall apposition and incomplete neck coverage of a tubular stent in stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms. We aimed to introduce a fusiform-shaped stent (FSS) and test its effectiveness in treating intracranial WNAs associated with a dilated PA using a three-dimensional (3D) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two FSS types were designed with the middle one-third segment dilated by 10% (FSS10) and 20% (FSS20) and were compared with the tubular-shaped stent (TSS). A patient-specific 3D WNA model was prototyped and produced, and in vitro stent placement was performed. Angiographic images of the three stent types were analyzed and compared using predetermined parameters. RESULTS: The stent lumens were significantly larger in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS in the middle segments (P=0.046), particularly FSS20 (P=0.018). The non-covered area at the ostium tended to be smaller in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The stent length was significantly longer in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS. The stent cell size was significantly larger in FSS than in TSS. CONCLUSION: Better vessel wall apposition and aneurysmal neck coverage was observed for FSS than for TSS. No significant difference was observed between FSS10 and FSS20.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61320372018-09-19 In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Jia, Zhen Yu Jiang, Yuan Yuan Woo, Jung Min Hwang, Seon Moon Lim, Ok Kyun Kim, Tae Il Park, Jung Cheol Lee, Hee Sun Kim, Eun Sang Lee, Deok Hee Neurointervention Original Paper PURPOSE: Wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs) associated with a dilated parent artery (PA) are not uncommon morphological abnormalities and usually cause inappropriate wall apposition and incomplete neck coverage of a tubular stent in stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms. We aimed to introduce a fusiform-shaped stent (FSS) and test its effectiveness in treating intracranial WNAs associated with a dilated PA using a three-dimensional (3D) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two FSS types were designed with the middle one-third segment dilated by 10% (FSS10) and 20% (FSS20) and were compared with the tubular-shaped stent (TSS). A patient-specific 3D WNA model was prototyped and produced, and in vitro stent placement was performed. Angiographic images of the three stent types were analyzed and compared using predetermined parameters. RESULTS: The stent lumens were significantly larger in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS in the middle segments (P=0.046), particularly FSS20 (P=0.018). The non-covered area at the ostium tended to be smaller in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The stent length was significantly longer in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS. The stent cell size was significantly larger in FSS than in TSS. CONCLUSION: Better vessel wall apposition and aneurysmal neck coverage was observed for FSS than for TSS. No significant difference was observed between FSS10 and FSS20. Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2018-09 2018-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6132037/ /pubmed/30196682 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2018.00976 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jia, Zhen Yu
Jiang, Yuan Yuan
Woo, Jung Min
Hwang, Seon Moon
Lim, Ok Kyun
Kim, Tae Il
Park, Jung Cheol
Lee, Hee Sun
Kim, Eun Sang
Lee, Deok Hee
In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
title In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
title_full In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
title_fullStr In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
title_short In Vitro Evaluation of Fusiform-Shaped Stents for Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
title_sort in vitro evaluation of fusiform-shaped stents for wide-neck intracranial aneurysm treatment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196682
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2018.00976
work_keys_str_mv AT jiazhenyu invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT jiangyuanyuan invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT woojungmin invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT hwangseonmoon invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT limokkyun invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT kimtaeil invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT parkjungcheol invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT leeheesun invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT kimeunsang invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment
AT leedeokhee invitroevaluationoffusiformshapedstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmtreatment