Cargando…

Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?

The goals of this study were to (1) introduce the MRI phenomenon of focal periphyseal edema (FOPE) to the orthopaedic community and (2) describe characteristic features and clinical outcomes of a small series of adolescents with FOPE lesions about the knee. The inclusion criterion was the presence o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Erica, Nicholson, Allen, Sharkey, Melinda S., Carter, Cordelia W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211386
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00047
_version_ 1783354295898341376
author Giles, Erica
Nicholson, Allen
Sharkey, Melinda S.
Carter, Cordelia W.
author_facet Giles, Erica
Nicholson, Allen
Sharkey, Melinda S.
Carter, Cordelia W.
author_sort Giles, Erica
collection PubMed
description The goals of this study were to (1) introduce the MRI phenomenon of focal periphyseal edema (FOPE) to the orthopaedic community and (2) describe characteristic features and clinical outcomes of a small series of adolescents with FOPE lesions about the knee. The inclusion criterion was the presence of activity-related knee pain and periphyseal edema on T2-weighted MRI. Exclusion criteria were skeletal maturity, history of traumatic knee injury, and the presence of other knee abnormalities. Participants completed the Short Form 10 and Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (pedi-IKDC) outcome assessments. Four patients (average age, 13.7 years) with atraumatic activity-related knee pain and FOPE lesions were retrospectively identified. At follow-up (average, 15.8 months), all patients reported the ability to participate in physical activities at the desired level. The mean pedi-IKDC score was 71.2. With supportive treatment, patients with FOPE were able to return to sport, although they had lower-than-average outcome scores. Increased awareness and understanding of this clinical entity are necessary for provision of effective, cost-efficient care to patients with FOPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61323262018-09-12 Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain? Giles, Erica Nicholson, Allen Sharkey, Melinda S. Carter, Cordelia W. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Case Report The goals of this study were to (1) introduce the MRI phenomenon of focal periphyseal edema (FOPE) to the orthopaedic community and (2) describe characteristic features and clinical outcomes of a small series of adolescents with FOPE lesions about the knee. The inclusion criterion was the presence of activity-related knee pain and periphyseal edema on T2-weighted MRI. Exclusion criteria were skeletal maturity, history of traumatic knee injury, and the presence of other knee abnormalities. Participants completed the Short Form 10 and Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (pedi-IKDC) outcome assessments. Four patients (average age, 13.7 years) with atraumatic activity-related knee pain and FOPE lesions were retrospectively identified. At follow-up (average, 15.8 months), all patients reported the ability to participate in physical activities at the desired level. The mean pedi-IKDC score was 71.2. With supportive treatment, patients with FOPE were able to return to sport, although they had lower-than-average outcome scores. Increased awareness and understanding of this clinical entity are necessary for provision of effective, cost-efficient care to patients with FOPE. Wolters Kluwer 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6132326/ /pubmed/30211386 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00047 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
spellingShingle Case Report
Giles, Erica
Nicholson, Allen
Sharkey, Melinda S.
Carter, Cordelia W.
Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?
title Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?
title_full Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?
title_fullStr Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?
title_full_unstemmed Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?
title_short Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain?
title_sort focal periphyseal edema: are we overtreating physiologic adolescent knee pain?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211386
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00047
work_keys_str_mv AT gileserica focalperiphysealedemaareweovertreatingphysiologicadolescentkneepain
AT nicholsonallen focalperiphysealedemaareweovertreatingphysiologicadolescentkneepain
AT sharkeymelindas focalperiphysealedemaareweovertreatingphysiologicadolescentkneepain
AT cartercordeliaw focalperiphysealedemaareweovertreatingphysiologicadolescentkneepain