Cargando…
Rethinking the Negativity Bias
The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant i...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7 |
_version_ | 1783354314837721088 |
---|---|
author | Corns, Jennifer |
author_facet | Corns, Jennifer |
author_sort | Corns, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant implications for everyday life and philosophical inquiry. In this article, I submit the negativity bias to its first dose of philosophical scrutiny and argue that it should be rejected. I conclude by offering some alternative hedonic hypotheses that survive the offered arguments and may prove fruitful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6132407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61324072018-09-14 Rethinking the Negativity Bias Corns, Jennifer Rev Philos Psychol Article The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant implications for everyday life and philosophical inquiry. In this article, I submit the negativity bias to its first dose of philosophical scrutiny and argue that it should be rejected. I conclude by offering some alternative hedonic hypotheses that survive the offered arguments and may prove fruitful. Springer Netherlands 2018-02-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132407/ /pubmed/30220944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Corns, Jennifer Rethinking the Negativity Bias |
title | Rethinking the Negativity Bias |
title_full | Rethinking the Negativity Bias |
title_fullStr | Rethinking the Negativity Bias |
title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking the Negativity Bias |
title_short | Rethinking the Negativity Bias |
title_sort | rethinking the negativity bias |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornsjennifer rethinkingthenegativitybias |