Cargando…

Rethinking the Negativity Bias

The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Corns, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7
_version_ 1783354314837721088
author Corns, Jennifer
author_facet Corns, Jennifer
author_sort Corns, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant implications for everyday life and philosophical inquiry. In this article, I submit the negativity bias to its first dose of philosophical scrutiny and argue that it should be rejected. I conclude by offering some alternative hedonic hypotheses that survive the offered arguments and may prove fruitful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61324072018-09-14 Rethinking the Negativity Bias Corns, Jennifer Rev Philos Psychol Article The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant implications for everyday life and philosophical inquiry. In this article, I submit the negativity bias to its first dose of philosophical scrutiny and argue that it should be rejected. I conclude by offering some alternative hedonic hypotheses that survive the offered arguments and may prove fruitful. Springer Netherlands 2018-02-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132407/ /pubmed/30220944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Corns, Jennifer
Rethinking the Negativity Bias
title Rethinking the Negativity Bias
title_full Rethinking the Negativity Bias
title_fullStr Rethinking the Negativity Bias
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the Negativity Bias
title_short Rethinking the Negativity Bias
title_sort rethinking the negativity bias
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cornsjennifer rethinkingthenegativitybias