Cargando…
The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study
BACKGROUND: Several methods exist to cost hospital contacts when estimating the cost effectiveness of a new intervention. However, the implications of choosing a particular approach remain unclear. We compare the use of the three main diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based national unit costs in Englan...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0673-y |
_version_ | 1783354324238204928 |
---|---|
author | Leal, José Manetti, Stefania Buchanan, James |
author_facet | Leal, José Manetti, Stefania Buchanan, James |
author_sort | Leal, José |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several methods exist to cost hospital contacts when estimating the cost effectiveness of a new intervention. However, the implications of choosing a particular approach remain unclear. We compare the use of the three main diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based national unit costs in England to determine whether choice of approach can impact on economic evaluation results. METHODS: A cost-utility model was developed to compare secondary fracture prevention models of care for hip fracture patients, using data from large primary and hospital care administrative datasets in England. A healthcare and personal social services payer perspective was adopted, and utilities were informed by a meta-regression. Hospital resource use was valued using three DRG-based unit costs, and regression-based costing models were developed using data from 13,906 patients to inform the model health states. RESULTS: Finished consultant episode (FCE)-level reference costs resulted in the highest costs on admission (£9075) and in the year of the fracture (£14,440). Relative to FCE-level costs, spell-level tariffs led to the lowest total hospital care costs per patient within 1 year of fracture (− £3691) compared with spell-level reference costs (− £2106). At a £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold, using spell-level reference costs or spell-level tariffs, the introduction of a nurse-led fracture liaison service model of care was the cost-effective alternative. However, using FCE-level reference costs, usual care was the cost-effective option. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, conditional on the set of national unit costs adopted, the costs of hip fracture may vary considerably and different decisions may be reached regarding the introduction of new healthcare interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-018-0673-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6132447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61324472018-09-14 The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study Leal, José Manetti, Stefania Buchanan, James Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Several methods exist to cost hospital contacts when estimating the cost effectiveness of a new intervention. However, the implications of choosing a particular approach remain unclear. We compare the use of the three main diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based national unit costs in England to determine whether choice of approach can impact on economic evaluation results. METHODS: A cost-utility model was developed to compare secondary fracture prevention models of care for hip fracture patients, using data from large primary and hospital care administrative datasets in England. A healthcare and personal social services payer perspective was adopted, and utilities were informed by a meta-regression. Hospital resource use was valued using three DRG-based unit costs, and regression-based costing models were developed using data from 13,906 patients to inform the model health states. RESULTS: Finished consultant episode (FCE)-level reference costs resulted in the highest costs on admission (£9075) and in the year of the fracture (£14,440). Relative to FCE-level costs, spell-level tariffs led to the lowest total hospital care costs per patient within 1 year of fracture (− £3691) compared with spell-level reference costs (− £2106). At a £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold, using spell-level reference costs or spell-level tariffs, the introduction of a nurse-led fracture liaison service model of care was the cost-effective alternative. However, using FCE-level reference costs, usual care was the cost-effective option. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, conditional on the set of national unit costs adopted, the costs of hip fracture may vary considerably and different decisions may be reached regarding the introduction of new healthcare interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-018-0673-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132447/ /pubmed/29785689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0673-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017, corrected publication 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Leal, José Manetti, Stefania Buchanan, James The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study |
title | The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study |
title_full | The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study |
title_short | The Impact of Hospital Costing Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study |
title_sort | impact of hospital costing methods on cost-effectiveness analysis: a case study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0673-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lealjose theimpactofhospitalcostingmethodsoncosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudy AT manettistefania theimpactofhospitalcostingmethodsoncosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudy AT buchananjames theimpactofhospitalcostingmethodsoncosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudy AT lealjose impactofhospitalcostingmethodsoncosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudy AT manettistefania impactofhospitalcostingmethodsoncosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudy AT buchananjames impactofhospitalcostingmethodsoncosteffectivenessanalysisacasestudy |