Cargando…
Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
BACKGROUND: In order to assess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties. OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x |
_version_ | 1783354335346819072 |
---|---|
author | Sattler, Matteo C. Jaunig, Johannes Watson, Estelle D. van Poppel, Mireille N. M. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Terwee, Caroline B. Dietz, Pavel |
author_facet | Sattler, Matteo C. Jaunig, Johannes Watson, Estelle D. van Poppel, Mireille N. M. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Terwee, Caroline B. Dietz, Pavel |
author_sort | Sattler, Matteo C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In order to assess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties. OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6132497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61324972018-09-14 Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties Sattler, Matteo C. Jaunig, Johannes Watson, Estelle D. van Poppel, Mireille N. M. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Terwee, Caroline B. Dietz, Pavel Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: In order to assess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties. OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132497/ /pubmed/30094797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Sattler, Matteo C. Jaunig, Johannes Watson, Estelle D. van Poppel, Mireille N. M. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Terwee, Caroline B. Dietz, Pavel Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
title | Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
title_full | Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
title_fullStr | Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
title_short | Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
title_sort | physical activity questionnaires for pregnancy: a systematic review of measurement properties |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sattlermatteoc physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties AT jaunigjohannes physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties AT watsonestelled physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties AT vanpoppelmireillenm physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties AT mokkinklidwineb physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties AT terweecarolineb physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties AT dietzpavel physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties |