Cargando…

Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

BACKGROUND: In order to assess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties. OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattler, Matteo C., Jaunig, Johannes, Watson, Estelle D., van Poppel, Mireille N. M., Mokkink, Lidwine B., Terwee, Caroline B., Dietz, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
_version_ 1783354335346819072
author Sattler, Matteo C.
Jaunig, Johannes
Watson, Estelle D.
van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Terwee, Caroline B.
Dietz, Pavel
author_facet Sattler, Matteo C.
Jaunig, Johannes
Watson, Estelle D.
van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Terwee, Caroline B.
Dietz, Pavel
author_sort Sattler, Matteo C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to assess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties. OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61324972018-09-14 Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties Sattler, Matteo C. Jaunig, Johannes Watson, Estelle D. van Poppel, Mireille N. M. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Terwee, Caroline B. Dietz, Pavel Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: In order to assess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties. OBJECTIVES: To systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132497/ /pubmed/30094797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Sattler, Matteo C.
Jaunig, Johannes
Watson, Estelle D.
van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Terwee, Caroline B.
Dietz, Pavel
Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
title Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
title_full Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
title_fullStr Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
title_full_unstemmed Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
title_short Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
title_sort physical activity questionnaires for pregnancy: a systematic review of measurement properties
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sattlermatteoc physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties
AT jaunigjohannes physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties
AT watsonestelled physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties
AT vanpoppelmireillenm physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties
AT mokkinklidwineb physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties
AT terweecarolineb physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties
AT dietzpavel physicalactivityquestionnairesforpregnancyasystematicreviewofmeasurementproperties