Cargando…
Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
Using the thyromental distance (TMD) measured based on the ultrasonographic location of the thyroid cartilage prominence as the criterion, we investigated the accuracy of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification of the thyroid cartilage prominence. Twenty-nine anesthetist resident voluntee...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0090-3 |
_version_ | 1783354350102380544 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Bin Peng, Hui Yao, Weidong Guo, Ling Jin, Xiaoju |
author_facet | Wang, Bin Peng, Hui Yao, Weidong Guo, Ling Jin, Xiaoju |
author_sort | Wang, Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using the thyromental distance (TMD) measured based on the ultrasonographic location of the thyroid cartilage prominence as the criterion, we investigated the accuracy of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification of the thyroid cartilage prominence. Twenty-nine anesthetist resident volunteers were recruited, including 10 first-year residents, 9 second-year residents and 10 third-year residents. Each volunteer measured the other 28 volunteers’ TMD. Then, the thyroid cartilage prominence of each volunteer was identified by ultrasonography of the junction of the vocal cord and thyroid cartilage, and the TMD was measured precisely. The error of the TMD measurement was determined by the minimal detectable difference (MDD) compared to the ultrasound measurement. A difference of greater than 5.4 mm between the TMD measured by volunteers and that based on ultrasound localization was defined as a measurement error. The measurement error rate of females’ TMD was significantly higher than that of males’ (50 vs 10%, P < 0.001). The error rates of anesthetist residents of first-year, second-year and third-year were 34, 27, and 31%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The error of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification is often, especially for women. More clinic experience don’t improve it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6132617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61326172018-09-13 Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? Wang, Bin Peng, Hui Yao, Weidong Guo, Ling Jin, Xiaoju J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Using the thyromental distance (TMD) measured based on the ultrasonographic location of the thyroid cartilage prominence as the criterion, we investigated the accuracy of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification of the thyroid cartilage prominence. Twenty-nine anesthetist resident volunteers were recruited, including 10 first-year residents, 9 second-year residents and 10 third-year residents. Each volunteer measured the other 28 volunteers’ TMD. Then, the thyroid cartilage prominence of each volunteer was identified by ultrasonography of the junction of the vocal cord and thyroid cartilage, and the TMD was measured precisely. The error of the TMD measurement was determined by the minimal detectable difference (MDD) compared to the ultrasound measurement. A difference of greater than 5.4 mm between the TMD measured by volunteers and that based on ultrasound localization was defined as a measurement error. The measurement error rate of females’ TMD was significantly higher than that of males’ (50 vs 10%, P < 0.001). The error rates of anesthetist residents of first-year, second-year and third-year were 34, 27, and 31%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The error of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification is often, especially for women. More clinic experience don’t improve it. Springer Netherlands 2017-12-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132617/ /pubmed/29234929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0090-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wang, Bin Peng, Hui Yao, Weidong Guo, Ling Jin, Xiaoju Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
title | Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
title_full | Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
title_fullStr | Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
title_short | Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
title_sort | can thyromental distance be measured accurately? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0090-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbin canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately AT penghui canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately AT yaoweidong canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately AT guoling canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately AT jinxiaoju canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately |