Cargando…

Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?

Using the thyromental distance (TMD) measured based on the ultrasonographic location of the thyroid cartilage prominence as the criterion, we investigated the accuracy of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification of the thyroid cartilage prominence. Twenty-nine anesthetist resident voluntee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bin, Peng, Hui, Yao, Weidong, Guo, Ling, Jin, Xiaoju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0090-3
_version_ 1783354350102380544
author Wang, Bin
Peng, Hui
Yao, Weidong
Guo, Ling
Jin, Xiaoju
author_facet Wang, Bin
Peng, Hui
Yao, Weidong
Guo, Ling
Jin, Xiaoju
author_sort Wang, Bin
collection PubMed
description Using the thyromental distance (TMD) measured based on the ultrasonographic location of the thyroid cartilage prominence as the criterion, we investigated the accuracy of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification of the thyroid cartilage prominence. Twenty-nine anesthetist resident volunteers were recruited, including 10 first-year residents, 9 second-year residents and 10 third-year residents. Each volunteer measured the other 28 volunteers’ TMD. Then, the thyroid cartilage prominence of each volunteer was identified by ultrasonography of the junction of the vocal cord and thyroid cartilage, and the TMD was measured precisely. The error of the TMD measurement was determined by the minimal detectable difference (MDD) compared to the ultrasound measurement. A difference of greater than 5.4 mm between the TMD measured by volunteers and that based on ultrasound localization was defined as a measurement error. The measurement error rate of females’ TMD was significantly higher than that of males’ (50 vs 10%, P < 0.001). The error rates of anesthetist residents of first-year, second-year and third-year were 34, 27, and 31%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The error of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification is often, especially for women. More clinic experience don’t improve it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61326172018-09-13 Can thyromental distance be measured accurately? Wang, Bin Peng, Hui Yao, Weidong Guo, Ling Jin, Xiaoju J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Using the thyromental distance (TMD) measured based on the ultrasonographic location of the thyroid cartilage prominence as the criterion, we investigated the accuracy of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification of the thyroid cartilage prominence. Twenty-nine anesthetist resident volunteers were recruited, including 10 first-year residents, 9 second-year residents and 10 third-year residents. Each volunteer measured the other 28 volunteers’ TMD. Then, the thyroid cartilage prominence of each volunteer was identified by ultrasonography of the junction of the vocal cord and thyroid cartilage, and the TMD was measured precisely. The error of the TMD measurement was determined by the minimal detectable difference (MDD) compared to the ultrasound measurement. A difference of greater than 5.4 mm between the TMD measured by volunteers and that based on ultrasound localization was defined as a measurement error. The measurement error rate of females’ TMD was significantly higher than that of males’ (50 vs 10%, P < 0.001). The error rates of anesthetist residents of first-year, second-year and third-year were 34, 27, and 31%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The error of TMD measurement by surface landmark identification is often, especially for women. More clinic experience don’t improve it. Springer Netherlands 2017-12-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132617/ /pubmed/29234929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0090-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Bin
Peng, Hui
Yao, Weidong
Guo, Ling
Jin, Xiaoju
Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
title Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
title_full Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
title_fullStr Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
title_full_unstemmed Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
title_short Can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
title_sort can thyromental distance be measured accurately?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0090-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbin canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately
AT penghui canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately
AT yaoweidong canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately
AT guoling canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately
AT jinxiaoju canthyromentaldistancebemeasuredaccurately