Cargando…

Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?

With the German Bundestag’s adoption of the Data Protection Adaptation and Implementation Act EU (DSAnpUG-EU) on 30 June 2017, the adaptation of German law to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has begun (Gesetz zur Anpassung des Datenschutzrechts an die Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 und zur U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1912-1
_version_ 1783354352869572608
author Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
author_facet Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
author_sort Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
collection PubMed
description With the German Bundestag’s adoption of the Data Protection Adaptation and Implementation Act EU (DSAnpUG-EU) on 30 June 2017, the adaptation of German law to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has begun (Gesetz zur Anpassung des Datenschutzrechts an die Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 und zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2016/680 (Datenschutz-Anpassungs- und -Umsetzungsgesetz—DSAnpUG-EU) v. 30. Juni 2017, BGBl. 2017 I p. 2097 et seq.). Despite being directly binding on all EU member states, the GDPR does not render national data protection provision obsolete—they are covered by the GDPR’s opening clauses which include regulatory mandates and room for derogation. This creates considerable need for national legislative adaptation. Art. 1 DSAnpUG-EU contains the necessary amendments to the Federal Data Protection Law (BDSG(neu)), thus creating the second major building block of future German data protection alongside the GDPR itself. Nevertheless, there are still numerous sector-specific regulations in other federal laws and the data protection laws of the 16 states also need amendments. Adjustment in Germany is well on its way, but implementation in general is still ongoing, with further consequences for data processing and sharing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61326362018-09-13 Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina Hum Genet Review With the German Bundestag’s adoption of the Data Protection Adaptation and Implementation Act EU (DSAnpUG-EU) on 30 June 2017, the adaptation of German law to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has begun (Gesetz zur Anpassung des Datenschutzrechts an die Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 und zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2016/680 (Datenschutz-Anpassungs- und -Umsetzungsgesetz—DSAnpUG-EU) v. 30. Juni 2017, BGBl. 2017 I p. 2097 et seq.). Despite being directly binding on all EU member states, the GDPR does not render national data protection provision obsolete—they are covered by the GDPR’s opening clauses which include regulatory mandates and room for derogation. This creates considerable need for national legislative adaptation. Art. 1 DSAnpUG-EU contains the necessary amendments to the Federal Data Protection Law (BDSG(neu)), thus creating the second major building block of future German data protection alongside the GDPR itself. Nevertheless, there are still numerous sector-specific regulations in other federal laws and the data protection laws of the 16 states also need amendments. Adjustment in Germany is well on its way, but implementation in general is still ongoing, with further consequences for data processing and sharing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132636/ /pubmed/30116955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1912-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
title Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
title_full Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
title_fullStr Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
title_full_unstemmed Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
title_short Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
title_sort germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1912-1
work_keys_str_mv AT molnargaborfruzsina germanyafairbalancebetweenscientificfreedomanddatasubjectsrights