Cargando…
Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?
With the German Bundestag’s adoption of the Data Protection Adaptation and Implementation Act EU (DSAnpUG-EU) on 30 June 2017, the adaptation of German law to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has begun (Gesetz zur Anpassung des Datenschutzrechts an die Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 und zur U...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1912-1 |
_version_ | 1783354352869572608 |
---|---|
author | Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina |
author_facet | Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina |
author_sort | Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the German Bundestag’s adoption of the Data Protection Adaptation and Implementation Act EU (DSAnpUG-EU) on 30 June 2017, the adaptation of German law to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has begun (Gesetz zur Anpassung des Datenschutzrechts an die Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 und zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2016/680 (Datenschutz-Anpassungs- und -Umsetzungsgesetz—DSAnpUG-EU) v. 30. Juni 2017, BGBl. 2017 I p. 2097 et seq.). Despite being directly binding on all EU member states, the GDPR does not render national data protection provision obsolete—they are covered by the GDPR’s opening clauses which include regulatory mandates and room for derogation. This creates considerable need for national legislative adaptation. Art. 1 DSAnpUG-EU contains the necessary amendments to the Federal Data Protection Law (BDSG(neu)), thus creating the second major building block of future German data protection alongside the GDPR itself. Nevertheless, there are still numerous sector-specific regulations in other federal laws and the data protection laws of the 16 states also need amendments. Adjustment in Germany is well on its way, but implementation in general is still ongoing, with further consequences for data processing and sharing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6132636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61326362018-09-13 Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina Hum Genet Review With the German Bundestag’s adoption of the Data Protection Adaptation and Implementation Act EU (DSAnpUG-EU) on 30 June 2017, the adaptation of German law to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has begun (Gesetz zur Anpassung des Datenschutzrechts an die Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 und zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2016/680 (Datenschutz-Anpassungs- und -Umsetzungsgesetz—DSAnpUG-EU) v. 30. Juni 2017, BGBl. 2017 I p. 2097 et seq.). Despite being directly binding on all EU member states, the GDPR does not render national data protection provision obsolete—they are covered by the GDPR’s opening clauses which include regulatory mandates and room for derogation. This creates considerable need for national legislative adaptation. Art. 1 DSAnpUG-EU contains the necessary amendments to the Federal Data Protection Law (BDSG(neu)), thus creating the second major building block of future German data protection alongside the GDPR itself. Nevertheless, there are still numerous sector-specific regulations in other federal laws and the data protection laws of the 16 states also need amendments. Adjustment in Germany is well on its way, but implementation in general is still ongoing, with further consequences for data processing and sharing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132636/ /pubmed/30116955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1912-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
title | Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
title_full | Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
title_fullStr | Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
title_full_unstemmed | Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
title_short | Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
title_sort | germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1912-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molnargaborfruzsina germanyafairbalancebetweenscientificfreedomanddatasubjectsrights |