Cargando…

Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening

PURPOSE: To validate the accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) ‘Occupational Earcheck (OEC)’ incorporating an automatic conditional rescreening, in an occupationally noise-exposed population. Secondary objectives were to assess th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheikh Rashid, Marya, Dreschler, Wouter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1332-5
_version_ 1783354353538564096
author Sheikh Rashid, Marya
Dreschler, Wouter A.
author_facet Sheikh Rashid, Marya
Dreschler, Wouter A.
author_sort Sheikh Rashid, Marya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To validate the accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) ‘Occupational Earcheck (OEC)’ incorporating an automatic conditional rescreening, in an occupationally noise-exposed population. Secondary objectives were to assess the effects of age on test accuracy measures, and to assess the test accuracy for different degrees of HFHL. METHODS: A study was conducted on cross-sectional data of occupational audiometric examinations, including the index test OEC and reference standard pure-tone air conduction audiometry, of 80 noise-exposed workers. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated for the OEC, after automatic conditional rescreening, for a younger and an older age group, and for two degrees of HFHL (HFHL(25): PTA3,4,6 ≥ 25 dB HL, and HFHL(35): PTA3,4,6 ≥ 35 dB HL, both for at least one ear). RESULTS: Test specificity for HFHL(25) after a single test was 63%, and improved to 93% after the automatic conditional rescreen. Test sensitivity for HFHL(25) decreased from 65% to 59%. Test sensitivity and specificity including automatic conditional rescreening for HFHL(35) was 94% and 90%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio for HFHL(25) was 8.4, and for HFHL(35) 9.4. The negative likelihood ratio for HFHL(35) was below 0.1. CONCLUSIONS: The OEC is an appropriate screening test, especially for HFHL(35). Normal-hearing workers who obtained a positive test result for the first test for one or two ears, benefit from having an automatic rescreen, resulting in an improvement of the test specificity, and hence prevent unnecessary referral.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61326392018-09-13 Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening Sheikh Rashid, Marya Dreschler, Wouter A. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: To validate the accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) ‘Occupational Earcheck (OEC)’ incorporating an automatic conditional rescreening, in an occupationally noise-exposed population. Secondary objectives were to assess the effects of age on test accuracy measures, and to assess the test accuracy for different degrees of HFHL. METHODS: A study was conducted on cross-sectional data of occupational audiometric examinations, including the index test OEC and reference standard pure-tone air conduction audiometry, of 80 noise-exposed workers. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated for the OEC, after automatic conditional rescreening, for a younger and an older age group, and for two degrees of HFHL (HFHL(25): PTA3,4,6 ≥ 25 dB HL, and HFHL(35): PTA3,4,6 ≥ 35 dB HL, both for at least one ear). RESULTS: Test specificity for HFHL(25) after a single test was 63%, and improved to 93% after the automatic conditional rescreen. Test sensitivity for HFHL(25) decreased from 65% to 59%. Test sensitivity and specificity including automatic conditional rescreening for HFHL(35) was 94% and 90%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio for HFHL(25) was 8.4, and for HFHL(35) 9.4. The negative likelihood ratio for HFHL(35) was below 0.1. CONCLUSIONS: The OEC is an appropriate screening test, especially for HFHL(35). Normal-hearing workers who obtained a positive test result for the first test for one or two ears, benefit from having an automatic rescreen, resulting in an improvement of the test specificity, and hence prevent unnecessary referral. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-29 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132639/ /pubmed/29959525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1332-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sheikh Rashid, Marya
Dreschler, Wouter A.
Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
title Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
title_full Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
title_fullStr Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
title_short Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
title_sort accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1332-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sheikhrashidmarya accuracyofaninternetbasedspeechinnoisehearingscreeningtestforhighfrequencyhearinglossincorporatingautomaticconditionalrescreening
AT dreschlerwoutera accuracyofaninternetbasedspeechinnoisehearingscreeningtestforhighfrequencyhearinglossincorporatingautomaticconditionalrescreening