Gout of hand and wrist: the value of US as compared with DECT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare findings of ultrasound (US) with dual-energy CT (DECT) in patients presenting with suspected gouty hand and wrist arthritis. METHODS: This prospective study included 180 patients (136 men and 44 women, age range, 31– 94 years; mean age, 65.9 years) with an initial clinical diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis who underwent DECT and US examination. Intra- and extra-articular findings of each modality were tabulated and calculated with DECT as gold standard. RESULTS: The final diagnosis of gout was positive in 97/180 patients (53.9%) by DECT, an alternative diagnosis confirmed in 83 patients. US showed a sensitivity of 70.1% (extra-articular: 42.5%, p < 0.0001; intra-articular: 80.3%, p = 0.14) and specificity of 51%. The double contour sign (DCS) was present in 58/61 patients with a positive US study for intra-articular gout (95.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of US for diagnosis of gouty arthritis in hand and wrist is limited, particularly with respect to extra-articular urate deposition. The DCS is the most sensitive sign for the assessment of gouty hand and wrist arthritis by US. KEY POINTS: • Sensitivity of US for diagnosis of gouty arthritis in hand and wrist is limited, particularly with respect to extra-articular gouty deposits. • The double contour sign is the most sensitive finding for the assessment of gouty hand and wrist arthritis by US. • Although the sensitivity of US for diagnosis of gouty hand and wrist arthritis is limited, it can be used as a first-line imaging modality in the presence of the DCS.