Cargando…

Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION: Early recognition of sepsis is critical to providing efficient and effective care for a potentially life-threatening condition. When automated sepsis screening is not available, front-line ED providers, often bedside nurses, must incorporate screening into their busy workflow. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutman, Lori, Beardsley, Elaine, Fenstermacher, Sara, Geiger, Julie, Zahradnik, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132751/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000076
_version_ 1783354377600237568
author Rutman, Lori
Beardsley, Elaine
Fenstermacher, Sara
Geiger, Julie
Zahradnik, Nancy
author_facet Rutman, Lori
Beardsley, Elaine
Fenstermacher, Sara
Geiger, Julie
Zahradnik, Nancy
author_sort Rutman, Lori
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Early recognition of sepsis is critical to providing efficient and effective care for a potentially life-threatening condition. When automated sepsis screening is not available, front-line ED providers, often bedside nurses, must incorporate screening into their busy workflow. The aim of this project was to increase the completion of an ED-based sepsis screening tool in at-risk patients from a baseline of 5–15% to > 50% in 3 months. METHODS: A key driver diagram was developed (Fig. 1). We used statistical process control to evaluate changes in sepsis screening over time. RESULTS: At baseline, 15% of ED patients with fever were screened using the electronic, nurse-initiated tool. We noted a single point outside the upper control limit (special cause variation) in October 2015 concurrent with implementation of a clinical pathway for septic shock, but this improvement was not sustained over time. Special cause was again noted with a shift of 8 points above the centerline in June 2016 following an educational push and reminders for ED nurses, increasing overall screening to 30%. Further improvement (special cause) was noted after significant modifications were made to the screening tool in June 2017 (Fig. 2). CONCLUSION: Quality improvement methodologies (development of a SMART aim, key driver diagram, and multiple plan-do-study-act cycles) led to improvement in screening at-risk patients for sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61327512018-10-02 Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department Rutman, Lori Beardsley, Elaine Fenstermacher, Sara Geiger, Julie Zahradnik, Nancy Pediatr Qual Saf Symposium Proceedings: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Colloquium – Dallas TX, December 2017 INTRODUCTION: Early recognition of sepsis is critical to providing efficient and effective care for a potentially life-threatening condition. When automated sepsis screening is not available, front-line ED providers, often bedside nurses, must incorporate screening into their busy workflow. The aim of this project was to increase the completion of an ED-based sepsis screening tool in at-risk patients from a baseline of 5–15% to > 50% in 3 months. METHODS: A key driver diagram was developed (Fig. 1). We used statistical process control to evaluate changes in sepsis screening over time. RESULTS: At baseline, 15% of ED patients with fever were screened using the electronic, nurse-initiated tool. We noted a single point outside the upper control limit (special cause variation) in October 2015 concurrent with implementation of a clinical pathway for septic shock, but this improvement was not sustained over time. Special cause was again noted with a shift of 8 points above the centerline in June 2016 following an educational push and reminders for ED nurses, increasing overall screening to 30%. Further improvement (special cause) was noted after significant modifications were made to the screening tool in June 2017 (Fig. 2). CONCLUSION: Quality improvement methodologies (development of a SMART aim, key driver diagram, and multiple plan-do-study-act cycles) led to improvement in screening at-risk patients for sepsis. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6132751/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000076 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Symposium Proceedings: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Colloquium – Dallas TX, December 2017
Rutman, Lori
Beardsley, Elaine
Fenstermacher, Sara
Geiger, Julie
Zahradnik, Nancy
Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department
title Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department
title_full Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department
title_fullStr Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department
title_short Improving Screening for Sepsis in the Pediatric Emergency Department
title_sort improving screening for sepsis in the pediatric emergency department
topic Symposium Proceedings: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Colloquium – Dallas TX, December 2017
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132751/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000076
work_keys_str_mv AT rutmanlori improvingscreeningforsepsisinthepediatricemergencydepartment
AT beardsleyelaine improvingscreeningforsepsisinthepediatricemergencydepartment
AT fenstermachersara improvingscreeningforsepsisinthepediatricemergencydepartment
AT geigerjulie improvingscreeningforsepsisinthepediatricemergencydepartment
AT zahradniknancy improvingscreeningforsepsisinthepediatricemergencydepartment