Cargando…

Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis

BACKGROUND: Nemours created an electronic screening tool for severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) called the Shock Score (Table 1). At a threshold score, a Shock Huddle (SH) is initiated, and the patient is assessed by the Shock RN (pediatric intensive care unit nurse with enhanced training on sepsis)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stinson, Hannah R., Stevens, Erica, Koetter, Paige, Setlik, Jennifer, Viteri, Shirley, Frizzola, Meg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000058
_version_ 1783354380443975680
author Stinson, Hannah R.
Stevens, Erica
Koetter, Paige
Setlik, Jennifer
Viteri, Shirley
Frizzola, Meg
author_facet Stinson, Hannah R.
Stevens, Erica
Koetter, Paige
Setlik, Jennifer
Viteri, Shirley
Frizzola, Meg
author_sort Stinson, Hannah R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nemours created an electronic screening tool for severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) called the Shock Score (Table 1). At a threshold score, a Shock Huddle (SH) is initiated, and the patient is assessed by the Shock RN (pediatric intensive care unit nurse with enhanced training on sepsis) with the primary team (Fig. 1). OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the characteristics of the score and the demographics of patients who underwent an SH. METHODS: One thousand seven hundred forty-eight admissions were screened over 109 days. Cases of SS/SS were identified by chart review of patients with an elevated score, transfers to the intensive care unit via the medical emergency team, and patients with International Classification of Disease-10 codes of R65.20/R65.21. A subset (1,323 admissions) was used to evaluate the score characteristics. RESULTS: There were 58 cases of SS/SS. Five cases were missed by the score due to a missed high risk condition or delay in documentation. One hundred twenty SH were completed on 51 unique patients. Seventy-three percent had a high risk condition. Nearly 40% of SHs involved diagnostic or therapeutic intervention (Table 2). The score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.8, sensitivity 0.9 (0.72–0.97), specificity 0.44 (0.35–0.54), negative predictive value 0.95 (0.84–0.99), and positive predictive value 0.28 (0.19–0.38). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The score demonstrates acceptable characteristics as a screening tool to identify children at risk for sepsis. Nearly 40% of SHs included a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. Misses of the score were related to high risk conditions that were not scored by the electronic medical record and delays in documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61327642018-10-02 Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis Stinson, Hannah R. Stevens, Erica Koetter, Paige Setlik, Jennifer Viteri, Shirley Frizzola, Meg Pediatr Qual Saf Symposium Proceedings: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Colloquium – Dallas TX, December 2017 BACKGROUND: Nemours created an electronic screening tool for severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) called the Shock Score (Table 1). At a threshold score, a Shock Huddle (SH) is initiated, and the patient is assessed by the Shock RN (pediatric intensive care unit nurse with enhanced training on sepsis) with the primary team (Fig. 1). OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the characteristics of the score and the demographics of patients who underwent an SH. METHODS: One thousand seven hundred forty-eight admissions were screened over 109 days. Cases of SS/SS were identified by chart review of patients with an elevated score, transfers to the intensive care unit via the medical emergency team, and patients with International Classification of Disease-10 codes of R65.20/R65.21. A subset (1,323 admissions) was used to evaluate the score characteristics. RESULTS: There were 58 cases of SS/SS. Five cases were missed by the score due to a missed high risk condition or delay in documentation. One hundred twenty SH were completed on 51 unique patients. Seventy-three percent had a high risk condition. Nearly 40% of SHs involved diagnostic or therapeutic intervention (Table 2). The score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.8, sensitivity 0.9 (0.72–0.97), specificity 0.44 (0.35–0.54), negative predictive value 0.95 (0.84–0.99), and positive predictive value 0.28 (0.19–0.38). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The score demonstrates acceptable characteristics as a screening tool to identify children at risk for sepsis. Nearly 40% of SHs included a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. Misses of the score were related to high risk conditions that were not scored by the electronic medical record and delays in documentation. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6132764/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000058 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CC-BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Symposium Proceedings: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Colloquium – Dallas TX, December 2017
Stinson, Hannah R.
Stevens, Erica
Koetter, Paige
Setlik, Jennifer
Viteri, Shirley
Frizzola, Meg
Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis
title Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis
title_full Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis
title_fullStr Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis
title_short Electronic Screening Tool and Shock Huddle Process for Children at Risk for Sepsis
title_sort electronic screening tool and shock huddle process for children at risk for sepsis
topic Symposium Proceedings: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Colloquium – Dallas TX, December 2017
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000058
work_keys_str_mv AT stinsonhannahr electronicscreeningtoolandshockhuddleprocessforchildrenatriskforsepsis
AT stevenserica electronicscreeningtoolandshockhuddleprocessforchildrenatriskforsepsis
AT koetterpaige electronicscreeningtoolandshockhuddleprocessforchildrenatriskforsepsis
AT setlikjennifer electronicscreeningtoolandshockhuddleprocessforchildrenatriskforsepsis
AT viterishirley electronicscreeningtoolandshockhuddleprocessforchildrenatriskforsepsis
AT frizzolameg electronicscreeningtoolandshockhuddleprocessforchildrenatriskforsepsis