Cargando…

Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) was introduced in the attempt to improve the outcomes of the open approach. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) was first reported by Gagner and Pomp (Surg Endosc 8:408–410, 1994). Unfortunately, due to its complexity and technical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo, Mangano, Alberto, Bustos, Roberto E., Gheza, Federico, Fernandes, Eduardo, Masrur, Mario A., Gangemi, Antonio, Bianco, Francesco M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6228-7
_version_ 1783354408004747264
author Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
Mangano, Alberto
Bustos, Roberto E.
Gheza, Federico
Fernandes, Eduardo
Masrur, Mario A.
Gangemi, Antonio
Bianco, Francesco M.
author_facet Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
Mangano, Alberto
Bustos, Roberto E.
Gheza, Federico
Fernandes, Eduardo
Masrur, Mario A.
Gangemi, Antonio
Bianco, Francesco M.
author_sort Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) was introduced in the attempt to improve the outcomes of the open approach. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) was first reported by Gagner and Pomp (Surg Endosc 8:408–410, 1994). Unfortunately, due to its complexity and technical demand, LPD never reached widespread popularity. Since it was first performed by P. C. Giulianotti in 2001, Robotic PD (RPD) has been gaining ground among surgeons. MIPD is included as a surgical option in the latest NCCN Guidelines. However, lack of surgical standardization, however, has limited the reproducibility of MIPD and made the acquisition of the technique by other surgeons difficult. We provide an accurate description of our standardized step-by-step RDP technique. METHODS: We took advantage of our 15-year long experience and > 150 cases performed to provide a step-by-step guidance of our RPD standardized technique. The description includes practical “tips and tricks” to facilitate the learning curve and assist with the teaching/evaluation process. RESULTS: 17 surgical steps were identified as key components of the RPD procedure. The steps reflect the subdivision of the RPD into several parts which help to understand a strategy that takes into accounts specific anatomical landmarks and the demands of the robotic platform. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization is a key element of the learning curve of RPD. It can potentially provide consistent, reproducible results that can be more easily evaluated. Despite promising results, full acceptance of RPD as the ‘gold standard’ is still work in progress. Randomized-controlled trials with the application of a standardized technique are necessary to better define the role of RPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61328862018-09-13 Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001 Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo Mangano, Alberto Bustos, Roberto E. Gheza, Federico Fernandes, Eduardo Masrur, Mario A. Gangemi, Antonio Bianco, Francesco M. Surg Endosc Dynamic Manuscript BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) was introduced in the attempt to improve the outcomes of the open approach. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) was first reported by Gagner and Pomp (Surg Endosc 8:408–410, 1994). Unfortunately, due to its complexity and technical demand, LPD never reached widespread popularity. Since it was first performed by P. C. Giulianotti in 2001, Robotic PD (RPD) has been gaining ground among surgeons. MIPD is included as a surgical option in the latest NCCN Guidelines. However, lack of surgical standardization, however, has limited the reproducibility of MIPD and made the acquisition of the technique by other surgeons difficult. We provide an accurate description of our standardized step-by-step RDP technique. METHODS: We took advantage of our 15-year long experience and > 150 cases performed to provide a step-by-step guidance of our RPD standardized technique. The description includes practical “tips and tricks” to facilitate the learning curve and assist with the teaching/evaluation process. RESULTS: 17 surgical steps were identified as key components of the RPD procedure. The steps reflect the subdivision of the RPD into several parts which help to understand a strategy that takes into accounts specific anatomical landmarks and the demands of the robotic platform. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization is a key element of the learning curve of RPD. It can potentially provide consistent, reproducible results that can be more easily evaluated. Despite promising results, full acceptance of RPD as the ‘gold standard’ is still work in progress. Randomized-controlled trials with the application of a standardized technique are necessary to better define the role of RPD. Springer US 2018-05-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132886/ /pubmed/29766304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6228-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Dynamic Manuscript
Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
Mangano, Alberto
Bustos, Roberto E.
Gheza, Federico
Fernandes, Eduardo
Masrur, Mario A.
Gangemi, Antonio
Bianco, Francesco M.
Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
title Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
title_full Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
title_fullStr Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
title_full_unstemmed Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
title_short Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
title_sort operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (rpd) at university of illinois at chicago (uic): 17 steps standardized technique: lessons learned since the first worldwide rpd performed in the year 2001
topic Dynamic Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6228-7
work_keys_str_mv AT giulianottipiercristoforo operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT manganoalberto operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT bustosrobertoe operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT ghezafederico operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT fernandeseduardo operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT masrurmarioa operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT gangemiantonio operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001
AT biancofrancescom operativetechniqueinroboticpancreaticoduodenectomyrpdatuniversityofillinoisatchicagouic17stepsstandardizedtechniquelessonslearnedsincethefirstworldwiderpdperformedintheyear2001