Cargando…
WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
OBJECTIVE: To implement a daily rounding tool in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to improve the discussion performance of identified clinical elements. We hypothesized that a semi-structured rounding tool created by a multidisciplinary team would be successfully implemented and sustained in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000044 |
_version_ | 1783354409166569472 |
---|---|
author | Ganesan, Rani Rajakumar, Priya Fogg, Louis Silvestri, Jean Kane, Jason M. |
author_facet | Ganesan, Rani Rajakumar, Priya Fogg, Louis Silvestri, Jean Kane, Jason M. |
author_sort | Ganesan, Rani |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To implement a daily rounding tool in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to improve the discussion performance of identified clinical elements. We hypothesized that a semi-structured rounding tool created by a multidisciplinary team would be successfully implemented and sustained in the PICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pre–post interventional study was conducted in a multidisciplinary medical-surgical PICU. Baseline data collection of undisclosed clinical elements was performed by covert observers, which resulted in the development of a comprehensive, nurse-driven rounding checklist. Frequencies of pre- and postintervention metrics were assessed after implementation, and sustainability was assessed at 5 years. RESULTS: Six months after implementation, 70% (7/10) of checklist elements demonstrated significant improvement. Five years after implementation, 172 of a possible 222 (74%) checklists were collected. Eighty percentage (8/10) of the measures sustained discussion frequency after 5 years of use. Nursing presence significantly improved at year 5 compared with the preimplementation period. Nursing satisfaction surveys distributed at year 5 showed that the rounding tool was useful and nurses were confident in understanding care plans at the end of rounds. Ninety-eight percentage of checklists revealed discrete transcription of qualitative daily goals. CONCLUSIONS: A semi-structured rounding tool created by a multidisciplinary team was successfully implemented, and performance was sustained at 5 years. This initiative led to improved bedside nursing presence during patient care rounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6132891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61328912018-09-18 WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Ganesan, Rani Rajakumar, Priya Fogg, Louis Silvestri, Jean Kane, Jason M. Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions OBJECTIVE: To implement a daily rounding tool in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to improve the discussion performance of identified clinical elements. We hypothesized that a semi-structured rounding tool created by a multidisciplinary team would be successfully implemented and sustained in the PICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pre–post interventional study was conducted in a multidisciplinary medical-surgical PICU. Baseline data collection of undisclosed clinical elements was performed by covert observers, which resulted in the development of a comprehensive, nurse-driven rounding checklist. Frequencies of pre- and postintervention metrics were assessed after implementation, and sustainability was assessed at 5 years. RESULTS: Six months after implementation, 70% (7/10) of checklist elements demonstrated significant improvement. Five years after implementation, 172 of a possible 222 (74%) checklists were collected. Eighty percentage (8/10) of the measures sustained discussion frequency after 5 years of use. Nursing presence significantly improved at year 5 compared with the preimplementation period. Nursing satisfaction surveys distributed at year 5 showed that the rounding tool was useful and nurses were confident in understanding care plans at the end of rounds. Ninety-eight percentage of checklists revealed discrete transcription of qualitative daily goals. CONCLUSIONS: A semi-structured rounding tool created by a multidisciplinary team was successfully implemented, and performance was sustained at 5 years. This initiative led to improved bedside nursing presence during patient care rounds. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6132891/ /pubmed/30229180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000044 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions Ganesan, Rani Rajakumar, Priya Fogg, Louis Silvestri, Jean Kane, Jason M. WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title | WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_full | WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_fullStr | WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_short | WE CARE 4 KIDS: Use of a Rounding Tool in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_sort | we care 4 kids: use of a rounding tool in the pediatric intensive care unit |
topic | Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganesanrani wecare4kidsuseofaroundingtoolinthepediatricintensivecareunit AT rajakumarpriya wecare4kidsuseofaroundingtoolinthepediatricintensivecareunit AT fogglouis wecare4kidsuseofaroundingtoolinthepediatricintensivecareunit AT silvestrijean wecare4kidsuseofaroundingtoolinthepediatricintensivecareunit AT kanejasonm wecare4kidsuseofaroundingtoolinthepediatricintensivecareunit |