Cargando…

Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey

Background Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by healthcare professionals is prevalent worldwide. Community pharmacists are the most frequently visited healthcare professional and are well placed to document ADRs as a part of their routine practice. Objective To measure community pharm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Raymond, Curtain, Colin, Bereznicki, Luke, Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30097819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0700-2
_version_ 1783354424682348544
author Li, Raymond
Curtain, Colin
Bereznicki, Luke
Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
author_facet Li, Raymond
Curtain, Colin
Bereznicki, Luke
Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
author_sort Li, Raymond
collection PubMed
description Background Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by healthcare professionals is prevalent worldwide. Community pharmacists are the most frequently visited healthcare professional and are well placed to document ADRs as a part of their routine practice. Objective To measure community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives towards ADR reporting and their reporting practices. Setting Community pharmacists in the New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Tasmania, Australia. Method A survey tool consisting of 28 items was developed, piloted and validated by a panel of expert reviewers. The final anonymised survey was distributed online to community pharmacists. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha were used to measure the validity and reliability of the tool, respectively. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to analyse knowledge, perspectives and ADR reporting practices. Main outcome measures: Knowledge, perceived importance, enablers and barriers to reporting ADRs. Results The survey tool showed acceptable validity and reliability. A total of 232 respondents completed the survey. The median knowledge score was 5 out of 10 (interquartile range, 2). Less than a third of respondents (31.0%) reported sufficient knowledge and training on ADR reporting. Only 35.3% of pharmacists reported at least one ADR in the previous 12 months. Non-reporting pharmacists were more likely to report lack of time as a barrier (P < 0.001), conversely they were more likely to report if the practice was remunerated (P = 0.007). Conclusion Under-reporting of ADRs by community pharmacists is highly prevalent. Initiatives to educate and train them on ADR reporting and simplifying the reporting process may improve reporting practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6132965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61329652018-09-18 Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey Li, Raymond Curtain, Colin Bereznicki, Luke Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by healthcare professionals is prevalent worldwide. Community pharmacists are the most frequently visited healthcare professional and are well placed to document ADRs as a part of their routine practice. Objective To measure community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives towards ADR reporting and their reporting practices. Setting Community pharmacists in the New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Tasmania, Australia. Method A survey tool consisting of 28 items was developed, piloted and validated by a panel of expert reviewers. The final anonymised survey was distributed online to community pharmacists. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha were used to measure the validity and reliability of the tool, respectively. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to analyse knowledge, perspectives and ADR reporting practices. Main outcome measures: Knowledge, perceived importance, enablers and barriers to reporting ADRs. Results The survey tool showed acceptable validity and reliability. A total of 232 respondents completed the survey. The median knowledge score was 5 out of 10 (interquartile range, 2). Less than a third of respondents (31.0%) reported sufficient knowledge and training on ADR reporting. Only 35.3% of pharmacists reported at least one ADR in the previous 12 months. Non-reporting pharmacists were more likely to report lack of time as a barrier (P < 0.001), conversely they were more likely to report if the practice was remunerated (P = 0.007). Conclusion Under-reporting of ADRs by community pharmacists is highly prevalent. Initiatives to educate and train them on ADR reporting and simplifying the reporting process may improve reporting practices. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-10 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6132965/ /pubmed/30097819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0700-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Raymond
Curtain, Colin
Bereznicki, Luke
Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
title Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in Australia: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort community pharmacists’ knowledge and perspectives of reporting adverse drug reactions in australia: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30097819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0700-2
work_keys_str_mv AT liraymond communitypharmacistsknowledgeandperspectivesofreportingadversedrugreactionsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurvey
AT curtaincolin communitypharmacistsknowledgeandperspectivesofreportingadversedrugreactionsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurvey
AT bereznickiluke communitypharmacistsknowledgeandperspectivesofreportingadversedrugreactionsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zaidisyedtabishrazi communitypharmacistsknowledgeandperspectivesofreportingadversedrugreactionsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurvey