Cargando…
Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work: A comment on G. Madison and T. Söderlund: Comparisons of scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: Gender studies can do better
The article is an invited comment on Guy Madison and Therese Söderlund (M&S): Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: Gender studies can do better. Scientometrics 115(3):1161–1183. The article pinpoints...
Autor principal: | Lykke, Nina |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2872-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mensuration and Mitigation of Gender-Based Disparity in Aesthetic Academia: How Can We Do Better?
por: Ketheeswaran, Suvethavarshini, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Can't do it, won't do it! Developing a theoretically framed intervention to encourage better decontamination practice in Scottish dental practices
por: Bonetti, Debbie, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN NURSING HOME RESIDENT QUALITY OF LIFE: WHY WOMEN DO BETTER
por: Davila, Heather, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Osteoarthritis: Can We Do Better?
por: Collins, Dylon P, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Commentary: If you can't do it, simulate it!
por: Ahmad, Danial, et al.
Publicado: (2022)