Cargando…

Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus

Olfactometry is globally acknowledged as a technique to determine odor concentrations, which are used to characterize odors for regulatory purposes, e.g., to protect the general public against harmful effects of air pollution. Although the determination procedure for odor concentrations is standardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stöckel, Stephan, Cordes, Jens, Stoffels, Benno, Wildanger, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29926329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2515-z
_version_ 1783354457791135744
author Stöckel, Stephan
Cordes, Jens
Stoffels, Benno
Wildanger, Dominik
author_facet Stöckel, Stephan
Cordes, Jens
Stoffels, Benno
Wildanger, Dominik
author_sort Stöckel, Stephan
collection PubMed
description Olfactometry is globally acknowledged as a technique to determine odor concentrations, which are used to characterize odors for regulatory purposes, e.g., to protect the general public against harmful effects of air pollution. Although the determination procedure for odor concentrations is standardized in some countries, continued research is required to understand uncertainties of odor monitoring and prediction. In this respect, the present paper strives to provide answers of paramount importance in olfactometry. To do so, a wealth of measurement data originating from six large-scale olfactometric stack emission proficiency tests conducted from 2015 to 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. The tests were hosted at a unique emission simulation apparatus—a replica of an industry chimney with 23 m in height—so that for the first time, conventional proficiency testing (no sampling) with real measurements (no reference concentrations) was combined. Surprisingly, highly variable recovery rates of the odorants were observed—no matter, which of the very different odorants was analyzed. Extended measurement uncertainties with roughly 30–300% up to 20–520% around a single olfactometric measurement value were calculated, which are way beyond the 95% confidence interval given by the widely used standard EN 13725 (45–220%) for assessment and control of odor emissions. Also, no evidence has been found that mixtures of odorants could be determined more precisely than single-component odorants. This is an important argument in the intensely discussed topic, whether n-butanol as current reference substance in olfactometry should be replaced by multi-component odorants. However, based on our data, resorting to an alternative reference substance will not solve the inherent problem of high uncertainty levels in dynamic olfactometry. Finally, robust statistics allowed to calculate reliable odor thresholds, which are an important prerequisite to convert mass concentrations to odor concentrations and vice versa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61331252018-09-18 Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus Stöckel, Stephan Cordes, Jens Stoffels, Benno Wildanger, Dominik Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article Olfactometry is globally acknowledged as a technique to determine odor concentrations, which are used to characterize odors for regulatory purposes, e.g., to protect the general public against harmful effects of air pollution. Although the determination procedure for odor concentrations is standardized in some countries, continued research is required to understand uncertainties of odor monitoring and prediction. In this respect, the present paper strives to provide answers of paramount importance in olfactometry. To do so, a wealth of measurement data originating from six large-scale olfactometric stack emission proficiency tests conducted from 2015 to 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. The tests were hosted at a unique emission simulation apparatus—a replica of an industry chimney with 23 m in height—so that for the first time, conventional proficiency testing (no sampling) with real measurements (no reference concentrations) was combined. Surprisingly, highly variable recovery rates of the odorants were observed—no matter, which of the very different odorants was analyzed. Extended measurement uncertainties with roughly 30–300% up to 20–520% around a single olfactometric measurement value were calculated, which are way beyond the 95% confidence interval given by the widely used standard EN 13725 (45–220%) for assessment and control of odor emissions. Also, no evidence has been found that mixtures of odorants could be determined more precisely than single-component odorants. This is an important argument in the intensely discussed topic, whether n-butanol as current reference substance in olfactometry should be replaced by multi-component odorants. However, based on our data, resorting to an alternative reference substance will not solve the inherent problem of high uncertainty levels in dynamic olfactometry. Finally, robust statistics allowed to calculate reliable odor thresholds, which are an important prerequisite to convert mass concentrations to odor concentrations and vice versa. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6133125/ /pubmed/29926329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2515-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stöckel, Stephan
Cordes, Jens
Stoffels, Benno
Wildanger, Dominik
Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
title Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
title_full Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
title_fullStr Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
title_full_unstemmed Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
title_short Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
title_sort scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29926329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2515-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stockelstephan scentsinthestackolfactometricproficiencytestingwithanemissionsimulationapparatus
AT cordesjens scentsinthestackolfactometricproficiencytestingwithanemissionsimulationapparatus
AT stoffelsbenno scentsinthestackolfactometricproficiencytestingwithanemissionsimulationapparatus
AT wildangerdominik scentsinthestackolfactometricproficiencytestingwithanemissionsimulationapparatus