Cargando…

Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the strength of associations between social network size and clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. METHOD: Studies were identified from a systematic search of electronic databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Degnan, Amy, Berry, Katherine, Sweet, Daryl, Abel, Kathryn, Crossley, Nick, Edge, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8
_version_ 1783354465441546240
author Degnan, Amy
Berry, Katherine
Sweet, Daryl
Abel, Kathryn
Crossley, Nick
Edge, Dawn
author_facet Degnan, Amy
Berry, Katherine
Sweet, Daryl
Abel, Kathryn
Crossley, Nick
Edge, Dawn
author_sort Degnan, Amy
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the strength of associations between social network size and clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. METHOD: Studies were identified from a systematic search of electronic databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) from January 1970 to June 2016. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed English language articles that examined associations between a quantitative measure of network size and symptomatic and/or functional outcome in schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses. RESULTS: Our search yielded 16 studies with 1,929 participants. Meta-analyses using random effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes (Hedge’s g) found that smaller social network size was moderately associated with more severe overall psychiatric symptoms (N = 5, n = 467, g = − 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = − 0.875, − 0.184, p = 0.003) and negative symptoms (N = 8, n = 577, g = − 0.75, 95% CI = − 0.997, − 0.512, p = 0.000). Statistical heterogeneity was observed I(2) = 63.04%; I(2) = 35.75%,) which could not be explained by low-quality network measures or sample heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses. There was no effect for positive symptoms (N = 7, n = 405, g = − 0.19, 95% CI = 0.494, 0.110, p = 0.213) or social functioning (N = 3, n = 209, g = 0.36, 95% CI = − 0.078, 0.801, p = 0.107). Narrative synthesis suggested that larger network size was associated with improved global functioning, but findings for affective symptoms and quality of life were mixed. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions which support individuals to build and maintain social networks may improve outcomes in schizophrenia. The review findings are cross-sectional and thus causal direction cannot be inferred. Further research is required to examine temporal associations between network characteristics and outcomes in schizophrenia and to test theoretical models relating to explanatory or mediating mechanisms. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61331572018-09-14 Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Degnan, Amy Berry, Katherine Sweet, Daryl Abel, Kathryn Crossley, Nick Edge, Dawn Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Review PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the strength of associations between social network size and clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. METHOD: Studies were identified from a systematic search of electronic databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) from January 1970 to June 2016. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed English language articles that examined associations between a quantitative measure of network size and symptomatic and/or functional outcome in schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses. RESULTS: Our search yielded 16 studies with 1,929 participants. Meta-analyses using random effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes (Hedge’s g) found that smaller social network size was moderately associated with more severe overall psychiatric symptoms (N = 5, n = 467, g = − 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = − 0.875, − 0.184, p = 0.003) and negative symptoms (N = 8, n = 577, g = − 0.75, 95% CI = − 0.997, − 0.512, p = 0.000). Statistical heterogeneity was observed I(2) = 63.04%; I(2) = 35.75%,) which could not be explained by low-quality network measures or sample heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses. There was no effect for positive symptoms (N = 7, n = 405, g = − 0.19, 95% CI = 0.494, 0.110, p = 0.213) or social functioning (N = 3, n = 209, g = 0.36, 95% CI = − 0.078, 0.801, p = 0.107). Narrative synthesis suggested that larger network size was associated with improved global functioning, but findings for affective symptoms and quality of life were mixed. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions which support individuals to build and maintain social networks may improve outcomes in schizophrenia. The review findings are cross-sectional and thus causal direction cannot be inferred. Further research is required to examine temporal associations between network characteristics and outcomes in schizophrenia and to test theoretical models relating to explanatory or mediating mechanisms. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-27 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6133157/ /pubmed/29951929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Degnan, Amy
Berry, Katherine
Sweet, Daryl
Abel, Kathryn
Crossley, Nick
Edge, Dawn
Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8
work_keys_str_mv AT degnanamy socialnetworksandsymptomaticandfunctionaloutcomesinschizophreniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT berrykatherine socialnetworksandsymptomaticandfunctionaloutcomesinschizophreniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sweetdaryl socialnetworksandsymptomaticandfunctionaloutcomesinschizophreniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abelkathryn socialnetworksandsymptomaticandfunctionaloutcomesinschizophreniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT crossleynick socialnetworksandsymptomaticandfunctionaloutcomesinschizophreniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT edgedawn socialnetworksandsymptomaticandfunctionaloutcomesinschizophreniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis