Cargando…

Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinglas, Victor D., Faraone, Leeza N., Needham, Dale M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533
_version_ 1783354474802184192
author Dinglas, Victor D.
Faraone, Leeza N.
Needham, Dale M.
author_facet Dinglas, Victor D.
Faraone, Leeza N.
Needham, Dale M.
author_sort Dinglas, Victor D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understanding the postdischarge outcomes that patients consider important (i.e., patient-important outcomes) for the purpose of advancing future clinical research in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Across multiple types of studies, patients, family members, researchers, and clinicians have consistently endorsed physical function, cognition, and mental health as important outcomes to evaluate in future research. Aspects of social health, such as return to work and changes in interpersonal relationships, also were noted in some research publications. Informed by these recent studies, an international Delphi consensus process (including patient and caregiver representatives) recommended the following core set of outcomes for use in all studies evaluating acute respiratory failure survivors after hospital discharge: survival, physical function (including muscle/nerve function and pulmonary function), cognition, mental health, health-related quality of life, and pain. The Delphi panel also reached consensus on recommended measurement instruments for some of these core outcomes. SUMMARY: Recent studies have made major advances in understanding patient-important outcomes to help guide future clinical research aimed at improving ICU survivors’ recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61331982018-09-20 Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies Dinglas, Victor D. Faraone, Leeza N. Needham, Dale M. Curr Opin Crit Care CRITICAL CARE OUTCOMES: Edited by Ognjen Gajic PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understanding the postdischarge outcomes that patients consider important (i.e., patient-important outcomes) for the purpose of advancing future clinical research in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Across multiple types of studies, patients, family members, researchers, and clinicians have consistently endorsed physical function, cognition, and mental health as important outcomes to evaluate in future research. Aspects of social health, such as return to work and changes in interpersonal relationships, also were noted in some research publications. Informed by these recent studies, an international Delphi consensus process (including patient and caregiver representatives) recommended the following core set of outcomes for use in all studies evaluating acute respiratory failure survivors after hospital discharge: survival, physical function (including muscle/nerve function and pulmonary function), cognition, mental health, health-related quality of life, and pain. The Delphi panel also reached consensus on recommended measurement instruments for some of these core outcomes. SUMMARY: Recent studies have made major advances in understanding patient-important outcomes to help guide future clinical research aimed at improving ICU survivors’ recovery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-10 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6133198/ /pubmed/30063492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle CRITICAL CARE OUTCOMES: Edited by Ognjen Gajic
Dinglas, Victor D.
Faraone, Leeza N.
Needham, Dale M.
Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
title Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
title_full Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
title_fullStr Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
title_full_unstemmed Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
title_short Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
title_sort understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
topic CRITICAL CARE OUTCOMES: Edited by Ognjen Gajic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533
work_keys_str_mv AT dinglasvictord understandingpatientimportantoutcomesaftercriticalillnessasynthesisofrecentqualitativeempiricalandconsensusrelatedstudies
AT faraoneleezan understandingpatientimportantoutcomesaftercriticalillnessasynthesisofrecentqualitativeempiricalandconsensusrelatedstudies
AT needhamdalem understandingpatientimportantoutcomesaftercriticalillnessasynthesisofrecentqualitativeempiricalandconsensusrelatedstudies