Cargando…
Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533 |
_version_ | 1783354474802184192 |
---|---|
author | Dinglas, Victor D. Faraone, Leeza N. Needham, Dale M. |
author_facet | Dinglas, Victor D. Faraone, Leeza N. Needham, Dale M. |
author_sort | Dinglas, Victor D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understanding the postdischarge outcomes that patients consider important (i.e., patient-important outcomes) for the purpose of advancing future clinical research in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Across multiple types of studies, patients, family members, researchers, and clinicians have consistently endorsed physical function, cognition, and mental health as important outcomes to evaluate in future research. Aspects of social health, such as return to work and changes in interpersonal relationships, also were noted in some research publications. Informed by these recent studies, an international Delphi consensus process (including patient and caregiver representatives) recommended the following core set of outcomes for use in all studies evaluating acute respiratory failure survivors after hospital discharge: survival, physical function (including muscle/nerve function and pulmonary function), cognition, mental health, health-related quality of life, and pain. The Delphi panel also reached consensus on recommended measurement instruments for some of these core outcomes. SUMMARY: Recent studies have made major advances in understanding patient-important outcomes to help guide future clinical research aimed at improving ICU survivors’ recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6133198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61331982018-09-20 Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies Dinglas, Victor D. Faraone, Leeza N. Needham, Dale M. Curr Opin Crit Care CRITICAL CARE OUTCOMES: Edited by Ognjen Gajic PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understanding the postdischarge outcomes that patients consider important (i.e., patient-important outcomes) for the purpose of advancing future clinical research in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Across multiple types of studies, patients, family members, researchers, and clinicians have consistently endorsed physical function, cognition, and mental health as important outcomes to evaluate in future research. Aspects of social health, such as return to work and changes in interpersonal relationships, also were noted in some research publications. Informed by these recent studies, an international Delphi consensus process (including patient and caregiver representatives) recommended the following core set of outcomes for use in all studies evaluating acute respiratory failure survivors after hospital discharge: survival, physical function (including muscle/nerve function and pulmonary function), cognition, mental health, health-related quality of life, and pain. The Delphi panel also reached consensus on recommended measurement instruments for some of these core outcomes. SUMMARY: Recent studies have made major advances in understanding patient-important outcomes to help guide future clinical research aimed at improving ICU survivors’ recovery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-10 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6133198/ /pubmed/30063492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | CRITICAL CARE OUTCOMES: Edited by Ognjen Gajic Dinglas, Victor D. Faraone, Leeza N. Needham, Dale M. Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
title | Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
title_full | Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
title_fullStr | Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
title_short | Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
title_sort | understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies |
topic | CRITICAL CARE OUTCOMES: Edited by Ognjen Gajic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dinglasvictord understandingpatientimportantoutcomesaftercriticalillnessasynthesisofrecentqualitativeempiricalandconsensusrelatedstudies AT faraoneleezan understandingpatientimportantoutcomesaftercriticalillnessasynthesisofrecentqualitativeempiricalandconsensusrelatedstudies AT needhamdalem understandingpatientimportantoutcomesaftercriticalillnessasynthesisofrecentqualitativeempiricalandconsensusrelatedstudies |