Cargando…

Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations

SIGNIFICANCE: For people with limited vision, wearable displays hold the potential to digitally enhance visual function. As these display technologies advance, it is important to understand their promise and limitations as vision aids. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test the potential of a co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinateder, Max, Gualtieri, Justin, Dunn, Matt J., Jarosz, Wojciech, Yang, Xing-Dong, Cooper, Emily A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29877901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001232
_version_ 1783354481084203008
author Kinateder, Max
Gualtieri, Justin
Dunn, Matt J.
Jarosz, Wojciech
Yang, Xing-Dong
Cooper, Emily A.
author_facet Kinateder, Max
Gualtieri, Justin
Dunn, Matt J.
Jarosz, Wojciech
Yang, Xing-Dong
Cooper, Emily A.
author_sort Kinateder, Max
collection PubMed
description SIGNIFICANCE: For people with limited vision, wearable displays hold the potential to digitally enhance visual function. As these display technologies advance, it is important to understand their promise and limitations as vision aids. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test the potential of a consumer augmented reality (AR) device for improving the functional vision of people with near-complete vision loss. METHODS: An AR application that translates spatial information into high-contrast visual patterns was developed. Two experiments assessed the efficacy of the application to improve vision: an exploratory study with four visually impaired participants and a main controlled study with participants with simulated vision loss (n = 48). In both studies, performance was tested on a range of visual tasks (identifying the location, pose and gesture of a person, identifying objects, and moving around in an unfamiliar space). Participants' accuracy and confidence were compared on these tasks with and without augmented vision, as well as their subjective responses about ease of mobility. RESULTS: In the main study, the AR application was associated with substantially improved accuracy and confidence in object recognition (all P < .001) and to a lesser degree in gesture recognition (P < .05). There was no significant change in performance on identifying body poses or in subjective assessments of mobility, as compared with a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Consumer AR devices may soon be able to support applications that improve the functional vision of users for some tasks. In our study, both artificially impaired participants and participants with near-complete vision loss performed tasks that they could not do without the AR system. Current limitations in system performance and form factor, as well as the risk of overconfidence, will need to be overcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61332292018-09-20 Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations Kinateder, Max Gualtieri, Justin Dunn, Matt J. Jarosz, Wojciech Yang, Xing-Dong Cooper, Emily A. Optom Vis Sci Original Investigations SIGNIFICANCE: For people with limited vision, wearable displays hold the potential to digitally enhance visual function. As these display technologies advance, it is important to understand their promise and limitations as vision aids. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test the potential of a consumer augmented reality (AR) device for improving the functional vision of people with near-complete vision loss. METHODS: An AR application that translates spatial information into high-contrast visual patterns was developed. Two experiments assessed the efficacy of the application to improve vision: an exploratory study with four visually impaired participants and a main controlled study with participants with simulated vision loss (n = 48). In both studies, performance was tested on a range of visual tasks (identifying the location, pose and gesture of a person, identifying objects, and moving around in an unfamiliar space). Participants' accuracy and confidence were compared on these tasks with and without augmented vision, as well as their subjective responses about ease of mobility. RESULTS: In the main study, the AR application was associated with substantially improved accuracy and confidence in object recognition (all P < .001) and to a lesser degree in gesture recognition (P < .05). There was no significant change in performance on identifying body poses or in subjective assessments of mobility, as compared with a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Consumer AR devices may soon be able to support applications that improve the functional vision of users for some tasks. In our study, both artificially impaired participants and participants with near-complete vision loss performed tasks that they could not do without the AR system. Current limitations in system performance and form factor, as well as the risk of overconfidence, will need to be overcome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-09 2018-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6133229/ /pubmed/29877901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001232 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Kinateder, Max
Gualtieri, Justin
Dunn, Matt J.
Jarosz, Wojciech
Yang, Xing-Dong
Cooper, Emily A.
Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations
title Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations
title_full Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations
title_fullStr Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations
title_full_unstemmed Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations
title_short Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid—Promise and Limitations
title_sort using an augmented reality device as a distance-based vision aid—promise and limitations
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29877901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001232
work_keys_str_mv AT kinatedermax usinganaugmentedrealitydeviceasadistancebasedvisionaidpromiseandlimitations
AT gualtierijustin usinganaugmentedrealitydeviceasadistancebasedvisionaidpromiseandlimitations
AT dunnmattj usinganaugmentedrealitydeviceasadistancebasedvisionaidpromiseandlimitations
AT jaroszwojciech usinganaugmentedrealitydeviceasadistancebasedvisionaidpromiseandlimitations
AT yangxingdong usinganaugmentedrealitydeviceasadistancebasedvisionaidpromiseandlimitations
AT cooperemilya usinganaugmentedrealitydeviceasadistancebasedvisionaidpromiseandlimitations