Cargando…
Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay
Allogrooming is a key aspect of chimpanzee sociality and many studies have investigated the role of reciprocity in a biological market. One theoretical form of reciprocity is time-matching, where payback consists of an equal duration of effort (e.g. twenty seconds of grooming repaid with twenty seco...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30204753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201810 |
_version_ | 1783354485336178688 |
---|---|
author | Phelps, Steve Ng, Wing Lon Musolesi, Mirco Russell, Yvan I. |
author_facet | Phelps, Steve Ng, Wing Lon Musolesi, Mirco Russell, Yvan I. |
author_sort | Phelps, Steve |
collection | PubMed |
description | Allogrooming is a key aspect of chimpanzee sociality and many studies have investigated the role of reciprocity in a biological market. One theoretical form of reciprocity is time-matching, where payback consists of an equal duration of effort (e.g. twenty seconds of grooming repaid with twenty seconds of grooming). Here, we report a study of allogrooming in a group of twenty-six captive chimpanzees (Chester Zoo, UK), based on more than 150 hours of data. For analysis, we introduce a methodological innovation called the “Delta scale”, which unidimensionally measures the accuracy of time-matching according to the extent of delay after the cessation of grooming. Delta is positive when reciprocation occurs after any non-zero delay (e.g. A grooms B and then B grooms A after a five second break) and it is negative when reciprocation begins whilst the original grooming has not yet ceased. Using a generalized linear mixed-method, we found evidence for time-matched reciprocation. However, this was true only for immediate reciprocation (Delta less than zero). If there was a temporal break in grooming between two members of a dyad, then there was no evidence that chimpanzees were using new bouts to retroactively correct for time-matching imbalances from previous bouts. Our results have implications for some of the cognitive constraints that differentiate real-life reciprocation from abstract theoretical models. Furthermore, we suggest that some apparent patterns of time-matched reciprocity may arise merely due to the law of large numbers, and we introduce a statistical test which takes this into account when aggregating grooming durations over a window of time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6133271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61332712018-09-27 Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay Phelps, Steve Ng, Wing Lon Musolesi, Mirco Russell, Yvan I. PLoS One Research Article Allogrooming is a key aspect of chimpanzee sociality and many studies have investigated the role of reciprocity in a biological market. One theoretical form of reciprocity is time-matching, where payback consists of an equal duration of effort (e.g. twenty seconds of grooming repaid with twenty seconds of grooming). Here, we report a study of allogrooming in a group of twenty-six captive chimpanzees (Chester Zoo, UK), based on more than 150 hours of data. For analysis, we introduce a methodological innovation called the “Delta scale”, which unidimensionally measures the accuracy of time-matching according to the extent of delay after the cessation of grooming. Delta is positive when reciprocation occurs after any non-zero delay (e.g. A grooms B and then B grooms A after a five second break) and it is negative when reciprocation begins whilst the original grooming has not yet ceased. Using a generalized linear mixed-method, we found evidence for time-matched reciprocation. However, this was true only for immediate reciprocation (Delta less than zero). If there was a temporal break in grooming between two members of a dyad, then there was no evidence that chimpanzees were using new bouts to retroactively correct for time-matching imbalances from previous bouts. Our results have implications for some of the cognitive constraints that differentiate real-life reciprocation from abstract theoretical models. Furthermore, we suggest that some apparent patterns of time-matched reciprocity may arise merely due to the law of large numbers, and we introduce a statistical test which takes this into account when aggregating grooming durations over a window of time. Public Library of Science 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6133271/ /pubmed/30204753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201810 Text en © 2018 Phelps et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Phelps, Steve Ng, Wing Lon Musolesi, Mirco Russell, Yvan I. Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
title | Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
title_full | Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
title_fullStr | Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
title_full_unstemmed | Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
title_short | Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
title_sort | precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30204753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phelpssteve precisetimematchinginchimpanzeeallogroomingdoesnotoccurafterashortdelay AT ngwinglon precisetimematchinginchimpanzeeallogroomingdoesnotoccurafterashortdelay AT musolesimirco precisetimematchinginchimpanzeeallogroomingdoesnotoccurafterashortdelay AT russellyvani precisetimematchinginchimpanzeeallogroomingdoesnotoccurafterashortdelay |