Cargando…
Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
Over the past decade, advances in the interdisciplinary field of network science have provided a framework for understanding the intrinsic structure and function of human brain networks. A particularly fruitful area of this work has focused on patterns of functional connectivity derived from noninva...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.4 |
_version_ | 1783354489629048832 |
---|---|
author | Tompson, Steven H. Falk, Emily B. Vettel, Jean M. Bassett, Danielle S. |
author_facet | Tompson, Steven H. Falk, Emily B. Vettel, Jean M. Bassett, Danielle S. |
author_sort | Tompson, Steven H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the past decade, advances in the interdisciplinary field of network science have provided a framework for understanding the intrinsic structure and function of human brain networks. A particularly fruitful area of this work has focused on patterns of functional connectivity derived from noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging. An important subset of these efforts has bridged the computational approaches of network science with the rich empirical data and biological hypotheses of neuroscience, and this research has begun to identify features of brain networks that explain individual differences in social, emotional, and cognitive functioning. The most common approach estimates connections assuming a single configuration of edges that is stable across the experimental session. In the literature, this is referred to as a static network approach, and researchers measure static brain networks while a subject is either at rest or performing a cognitively demanding task. Research on social and emotional functioning has primarily focused on linking static brain networks with individual differences, but recent advances have extended this work to examine temporal fluctuations in dynamic brain networks. Mounting evidence suggests that both the strength and flexibility of time-evolving brain networks influence individual differences in executive function, attention, working memory, and learning. In this review, we first examine the current evidence for brain networks involved in cognitive functioning. Then we review some preliminary evidence linking static network properties to individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We then discuss the applicability of emerging dynamic network methods for examining individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We close with an outline of important frontiers at the intersection between network science and neuroscience that will enhance our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of social behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6133307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61333072019-01-05 Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience Tompson, Steven H. Falk, Emily B. Vettel, Jean M. Bassett, Danielle S. Personal Neurosci Review Paper Over the past decade, advances in the interdisciplinary field of network science have provided a framework for understanding the intrinsic structure and function of human brain networks. A particularly fruitful area of this work has focused on patterns of functional connectivity derived from noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging. An important subset of these efforts has bridged the computational approaches of network science with the rich empirical data and biological hypotheses of neuroscience, and this research has begun to identify features of brain networks that explain individual differences in social, emotional, and cognitive functioning. The most common approach estimates connections assuming a single configuration of edges that is stable across the experimental session. In the literature, this is referred to as a static network approach, and researchers measure static brain networks while a subject is either at rest or performing a cognitively demanding task. Research on social and emotional functioning has primarily focused on linking static brain networks with individual differences, but recent advances have extended this work to examine temporal fluctuations in dynamic brain networks. Mounting evidence suggests that both the strength and flexibility of time-evolving brain networks influence individual differences in executive function, attention, working memory, and learning. In this review, we first examine the current evidence for brain networks involved in cognitive functioning. Then we review some preliminary evidence linking static network properties to individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We then discuss the applicability of emerging dynamic network methods for examining individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We close with an outline of important frontiers at the intersection between network science and neuroscience that will enhance our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of social behavior. Cambridge University Press 2018-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6133307/ /pubmed/30221246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.4 Text en © The Authors 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Tompson, Steven H. Falk, Emily B. Vettel, Jean M. Bassett, Danielle S. Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience |
title | Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience |
title_full | Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience |
title_fullStr | Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience |
title_short | Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience |
title_sort | network approaches to understand individual differences in brain connectivity: opportunities for personality neuroscience |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tompsonstevenh networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience AT falkemilyb networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience AT vetteljeanm networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience AT bassettdanielles networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience |