Cargando…

Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience

Over the past decade, advances in the interdisciplinary field of network science have provided a framework for understanding the intrinsic structure and function of human brain networks. A particularly fruitful area of this work has focused on patterns of functional connectivity derived from noninva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tompson, Steven H., Falk, Emily B., Vettel, Jean M., Bassett, Danielle S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.4
_version_ 1783354489629048832
author Tompson, Steven H.
Falk, Emily B.
Vettel, Jean M.
Bassett, Danielle S.
author_facet Tompson, Steven H.
Falk, Emily B.
Vettel, Jean M.
Bassett, Danielle S.
author_sort Tompson, Steven H.
collection PubMed
description Over the past decade, advances in the interdisciplinary field of network science have provided a framework for understanding the intrinsic structure and function of human brain networks. A particularly fruitful area of this work has focused on patterns of functional connectivity derived from noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging. An important subset of these efforts has bridged the computational approaches of network science with the rich empirical data and biological hypotheses of neuroscience, and this research has begun to identify features of brain networks that explain individual differences in social, emotional, and cognitive functioning. The most common approach estimates connections assuming a single configuration of edges that is stable across the experimental session. In the literature, this is referred to as a static network approach, and researchers measure static brain networks while a subject is either at rest or performing a cognitively demanding task. Research on social and emotional functioning has primarily focused on linking static brain networks with individual differences, but recent advances have extended this work to examine temporal fluctuations in dynamic brain networks. Mounting evidence suggests that both the strength and flexibility of time-evolving brain networks influence individual differences in executive function, attention, working memory, and learning. In this review, we first examine the current evidence for brain networks involved in cognitive functioning. Then we review some preliminary evidence linking static network properties to individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We then discuss the applicability of emerging dynamic network methods for examining individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We close with an outline of important frontiers at the intersection between network science and neuroscience that will enhance our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of social behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61333072019-01-05 Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience Tompson, Steven H. Falk, Emily B. Vettel, Jean M. Bassett, Danielle S. Personal Neurosci Review Paper Over the past decade, advances in the interdisciplinary field of network science have provided a framework for understanding the intrinsic structure and function of human brain networks. A particularly fruitful area of this work has focused on patterns of functional connectivity derived from noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging. An important subset of these efforts has bridged the computational approaches of network science with the rich empirical data and biological hypotheses of neuroscience, and this research has begun to identify features of brain networks that explain individual differences in social, emotional, and cognitive functioning. The most common approach estimates connections assuming a single configuration of edges that is stable across the experimental session. In the literature, this is referred to as a static network approach, and researchers measure static brain networks while a subject is either at rest or performing a cognitively demanding task. Research on social and emotional functioning has primarily focused on linking static brain networks with individual differences, but recent advances have extended this work to examine temporal fluctuations in dynamic brain networks. Mounting evidence suggests that both the strength and flexibility of time-evolving brain networks influence individual differences in executive function, attention, working memory, and learning. In this review, we first examine the current evidence for brain networks involved in cognitive functioning. Then we review some preliminary evidence linking static network properties to individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We then discuss the applicability of emerging dynamic network methods for examining individual differences in social and emotional functioning. We close with an outline of important frontiers at the intersection between network science and neuroscience that will enhance our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of social behavior. Cambridge University Press 2018-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6133307/ /pubmed/30221246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.4 Text en © The Authors 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Tompson, Steven H.
Falk, Emily B.
Vettel, Jean M.
Bassett, Danielle S.
Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
title Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
title_full Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
title_fullStr Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
title_short Network Approaches to Understand Individual Differences in Brain Connectivity: Opportunities for Personality Neuroscience
title_sort network approaches to understand individual differences in brain connectivity: opportunities for personality neuroscience
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.4
work_keys_str_mv AT tompsonstevenh networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience
AT falkemilyb networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience
AT vetteljeanm networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience
AT bassettdanielles networkapproachestounderstandindividualdifferencesinbrainconnectivityopportunitiesforpersonalityneuroscience