Cargando…

Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks

The robustness and resilience of complex networks have been widely studied and discussed in both research and industry because today, the diversity of system components and the complexity of the connection between units are increasingly influencing the reliability of complex systems. Previous studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Xing, Wang, Huixiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30204786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203894
_version_ 1783354496523436032
author Pan, Xing
Wang, Huixiong
author_facet Pan, Xing
Wang, Huixiong
author_sort Pan, Xing
collection PubMed
description The robustness and resilience of complex networks have been widely studied and discussed in both research and industry because today, the diversity of system components and the complexity of the connection between units are increasingly influencing the reliability of complex systems. Previous studies have focused on node failure in networks, proposing several performance indicators. However, a single performance indicator cannot comprehensively measure all the performance aspects; thus, the selected performance indicators and recovery strategies lack consistency with respect to the targeted complex systems. This paper introduces a novel stress–strength-balanced weighted network model based on two network transmission hypotheses. Then, with respect to different concerns of the complex network, we propose two modified network performance measurement indicators and compare these indicators in terms of their trends in the attack process. In addition, we introduce several network recovery strategies and compare their efficiencies. Our findings are as follows: (1) The evaluation and judgment of the network performance depend on the performance measurement indicators we use. (2) Different recovery strategies exhibit distinct efficiencies in recovering different aspects of network performance, and no strategy exists that can improve all the network performance aspects simultaneously. (3) The timing of the recovery is proved to have a deep influence on the cost and efficiency of network recovery; thus, the optimal recovery strategy for a damaged network varies with the extent of the damage. From the results of the simulation of the attack-recovery process, we conclude that while defining and analyzing complex network models, we should adjust our network topology, weight assignment, and performance indicators in accordance with the focal characteristics of complex systems so that we can use the network model to build robust complex systems and efficient logistics and maintenance strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61333712018-09-27 Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks Pan, Xing Wang, Huixiong PLoS One Research Article The robustness and resilience of complex networks have been widely studied and discussed in both research and industry because today, the diversity of system components and the complexity of the connection between units are increasingly influencing the reliability of complex systems. Previous studies have focused on node failure in networks, proposing several performance indicators. However, a single performance indicator cannot comprehensively measure all the performance aspects; thus, the selected performance indicators and recovery strategies lack consistency with respect to the targeted complex systems. This paper introduces a novel stress–strength-balanced weighted network model based on two network transmission hypotheses. Then, with respect to different concerns of the complex network, we propose two modified network performance measurement indicators and compare these indicators in terms of their trends in the attack process. In addition, we introduce several network recovery strategies and compare their efficiencies. Our findings are as follows: (1) The evaluation and judgment of the network performance depend on the performance measurement indicators we use. (2) Different recovery strategies exhibit distinct efficiencies in recovering different aspects of network performance, and no strategy exists that can improve all the network performance aspects simultaneously. (3) The timing of the recovery is proved to have a deep influence on the cost and efficiency of network recovery; thus, the optimal recovery strategy for a damaged network varies with the extent of the damage. From the results of the simulation of the attack-recovery process, we conclude that while defining and analyzing complex network models, we should adjust our network topology, weight assignment, and performance indicators in accordance with the focal characteristics of complex systems so that we can use the network model to build robust complex systems and efficient logistics and maintenance strategies. Public Library of Science 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6133371/ /pubmed/30204786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203894 Text en © 2018 Pan, Wang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pan, Xing
Wang, Huixiong
Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
title Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
title_full Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
title_fullStr Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
title_full_unstemmed Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
title_short Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
title_sort resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30204786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203894
work_keys_str_mv AT panxing resilienceofandrecoverystrategiesforweightednetworks
AT wanghuixiong resilienceofandrecoverystrategiesforweightednetworks