Cargando…

Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to investigate whether early precut sphincterotomy (EPS) itself increases the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, and perforation, or improves the overall success rates of biliary cannulation. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Zengwei, Yang, Yuan, Yang, Zhangfu, Meng, Wenbo, Li, Xun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012213
_version_ 1783354511204548608
author Tang, Zengwei
Yang, Yuan
Yang, Zhangfu
Meng, Wenbo
Li, Xun
author_facet Tang, Zengwei
Yang, Yuan
Yang, Zhangfu
Meng, Wenbo
Li, Xun
author_sort Tang, Zengwei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to investigate whether early precut sphincterotomy (EPS) itself increases the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, and perforation, or improves the overall success rates of biliary cannulation. METHODS: Four electronical databases were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the incidence of adverse events for difficult biliary access (DBA) between EPS groups and persistent cannulation attempts (PCA). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of bleeding and perforation, and the overall success rates of biliary cannulation. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool data on the outcomes into random-effect models. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and stratified analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3. Furthermore, we performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the reliability of the primary endpoint and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (999 patients with DBA of 10450, 9.5%) were included. The incidence of PEP was significantly lower in EPS groups than PCA (risk ratio [RR] = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36, 0.92, P = .02). Furthermore, TSA (TSA-adjusted 95% CI 0.30–0.82, P = .0061) and subgroup analysis stratified by the fellow involvement in initial cannulation before randomization, technique of precut, and the definition of DBA confirmed this finding. Success rates of overall cannulation (RR = 1.00, P = .94), bleeding (RR = 1.22, P = .58), and perforation (RR = 1.59, P = .32) were similar in both groups; however, the results of TSA could not confirm these findings. CONCLUSION: Both the quality and the quantity of evidence supporting, compared with PCA, EPS itself do not increase the risk of PEP for DBA patients. Moreover, subgroup analysis demonstrated that EPS can significantly decrease the risk of PEP when it is performed by qualified staff endoscopists with using needle-knife fistulutomy earlier for patients with DBA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61334332018-09-19 Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Tang, Zengwei Yang, Yuan Yang, Zhangfu Meng, Wenbo Li, Xun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to investigate whether early precut sphincterotomy (EPS) itself increases the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, and perforation, or improves the overall success rates of biliary cannulation. METHODS: Four electronical databases were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the incidence of adverse events for difficult biliary access (DBA) between EPS groups and persistent cannulation attempts (PCA). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of bleeding and perforation, and the overall success rates of biliary cannulation. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool data on the outcomes into random-effect models. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and stratified analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3. Furthermore, we performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the reliability of the primary endpoint and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (999 patients with DBA of 10450, 9.5%) were included. The incidence of PEP was significantly lower in EPS groups than PCA (risk ratio [RR] = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36, 0.92, P = .02). Furthermore, TSA (TSA-adjusted 95% CI 0.30–0.82, P = .0061) and subgroup analysis stratified by the fellow involvement in initial cannulation before randomization, technique of precut, and the definition of DBA confirmed this finding. Success rates of overall cannulation (RR = 1.00, P = .94), bleeding (RR = 1.22, P = .58), and perforation (RR = 1.59, P = .32) were similar in both groups; however, the results of TSA could not confirm these findings. CONCLUSION: Both the quality and the quantity of evidence supporting, compared with PCA, EPS itself do not increase the risk of PEP for DBA patients. Moreover, subgroup analysis demonstrated that EPS can significantly decrease the risk of PEP when it is performed by qualified staff endoscopists with using needle-knife fistulutomy earlier for patients with DBA. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6133433/ /pubmed/30200135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012213 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Zengwei
Yang, Yuan
Yang, Zhangfu
Meng, Wenbo
Li, Xun
Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_short Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_sort early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012213
work_keys_str_mv AT tangzengwei earlyprecutsphincterotomydoesnotincreasetheriskofadverseeventsforpatientswithdifficultbiliaryaccessasystematicreviewofrandomizedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yangyuan earlyprecutsphincterotomydoesnotincreasetheriskofadverseeventsforpatientswithdifficultbiliaryaccessasystematicreviewofrandomizedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yangzhangfu earlyprecutsphincterotomydoesnotincreasetheriskofadverseeventsforpatientswithdifficultbiliaryaccessasystematicreviewofrandomizedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT mengwenbo earlyprecutsphincterotomydoesnotincreasetheriskofadverseeventsforpatientswithdifficultbiliaryaccessasystematicreviewofrandomizedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT lixun earlyprecutsphincterotomydoesnotincreasetheriskofadverseeventsforpatientswithdifficultbiliaryaccessasystematicreviewofrandomizedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis