Cargando…

The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study

The aim of this study was to compare the midterm outcomes of 1-stage and 3-stage surgical procedures to treat anorectal malformations (ARMs) with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula using laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). A total of 56 patients with ARMs and rectoprostatic and rectobu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Hui, Huang, Rui, Chen, Long, Diao, Mei, Cheng, Wei, Li, Long, Cui, Xiao-Dai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30095662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011843
_version_ 1783354536684945408
author Xiao, Hui
Huang, Rui
Chen, Long
Diao, Mei
Cheng, Wei
Li, Long
Cui, Xiao-Dai
author_facet Xiao, Hui
Huang, Rui
Chen, Long
Diao, Mei
Cheng, Wei
Li, Long
Cui, Xiao-Dai
author_sort Xiao, Hui
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare the midterm outcomes of 1-stage and 3-stage surgical procedures to treat anorectal malformations (ARMs) with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula using laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). A total of 56 patients with ARMs and rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula who underwent LAARP from January 2011 to May 2014 in our institution were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups according to the stage of procedure. The patients’ data and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The Krickenbeck classification was used for assessing the bowel functions. About 20 ARM newborns (rectoprostatic fistula [12], rectobulbar fistula [8]) successfully underwent a 1-stage LAARP, and about 36 ARM children (rectoprostatic fistula [20], rectobulbar fistula [16]) underwent a 3-stage LAARP (colostomy, LAARP, and closure of colostomy). The average age at the LAARP procedure in 1-stage group was significantly lower than that in 3-stage group (39.8 ± 8.1 hours vs 4.9 ± 1.2 months; P = .00). The average operative time during the definitive procedure was 132.2 ± 15.9 minutes in the 1-stage group and 120.5 ± 12.7 minutes in the 3-stage group (P = .13). There was only 5 to 10 mL of blood loss during the LAARP procedure both the groups (P = .75). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative hospital stay during the definitive procedure (10.2 ± 2.3 days vs 8.5 ± 2.2 days; P = .22). The rate of surgical site infection and dehiscence was 5% (1/20) in the 1-stage group and 5.6% (2/36) in 3-stage group (P = 1.00). During the period of follow-up, the rate of voluntary bowel movement was 90% (18/20) in 1-stage group and 94.4% (34/36) in 3-stage group (P = .94). Free from soiling or grade I soiling was 80% (16/20) in 1-stage group and 83.3% (30/36) in 3-stage group (P = 1.00); grade II soiling was found in 3 (10%) patients in 1-stage group and 85.7% in 3-stage group (P = .75); grade III soiling was found in 3 (10%) patients in 1-stage group and 85.7% in 3-stage group (P = 1.00). Three patients (15%) in 1-stage group and 5 patients (13.9%) in 3-stage group suffered from grade I constipation (P = 1.00); while 3 (15%) patients in 1-stage group and 4 patients (11.1%) in 3-stage group had grade II constipation (P = 1.00); no patients in the 2 groups suffered from grade III constipation. The 1-stage LAARP procedure for neonate with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula can achieve comparable midterm outcomes as the conventional 3-stage LAARP procedure. It provides an alternative method to rectify the ARMs with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula without colostomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61335442018-09-19 The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study Xiao, Hui Huang, Rui Chen, Long Diao, Mei Cheng, Wei Li, Long Cui, Xiao-Dai Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The aim of this study was to compare the midterm outcomes of 1-stage and 3-stage surgical procedures to treat anorectal malformations (ARMs) with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula using laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). A total of 56 patients with ARMs and rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula who underwent LAARP from January 2011 to May 2014 in our institution were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups according to the stage of procedure. The patients’ data and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The Krickenbeck classification was used for assessing the bowel functions. About 20 ARM newborns (rectoprostatic fistula [12], rectobulbar fistula [8]) successfully underwent a 1-stage LAARP, and about 36 ARM children (rectoprostatic fistula [20], rectobulbar fistula [16]) underwent a 3-stage LAARP (colostomy, LAARP, and closure of colostomy). The average age at the LAARP procedure in 1-stage group was significantly lower than that in 3-stage group (39.8 ± 8.1 hours vs 4.9 ± 1.2 months; P = .00). The average operative time during the definitive procedure was 132.2 ± 15.9 minutes in the 1-stage group and 120.5 ± 12.7 minutes in the 3-stage group (P = .13). There was only 5 to 10 mL of blood loss during the LAARP procedure both the groups (P = .75). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative hospital stay during the definitive procedure (10.2 ± 2.3 days vs 8.5 ± 2.2 days; P = .22). The rate of surgical site infection and dehiscence was 5% (1/20) in the 1-stage group and 5.6% (2/36) in 3-stage group (P = 1.00). During the period of follow-up, the rate of voluntary bowel movement was 90% (18/20) in 1-stage group and 94.4% (34/36) in 3-stage group (P = .94). Free from soiling or grade I soiling was 80% (16/20) in 1-stage group and 83.3% (30/36) in 3-stage group (P = 1.00); grade II soiling was found in 3 (10%) patients in 1-stage group and 85.7% in 3-stage group (P = .75); grade III soiling was found in 3 (10%) patients in 1-stage group and 85.7% in 3-stage group (P = 1.00). Three patients (15%) in 1-stage group and 5 patients (13.9%) in 3-stage group suffered from grade I constipation (P = 1.00); while 3 (15%) patients in 1-stage group and 4 patients (11.1%) in 3-stage group had grade II constipation (P = 1.00); no patients in the 2 groups suffered from grade III constipation. The 1-stage LAARP procedure for neonate with rectoprostatic and rectobulbar fistula can achieve comparable midterm outcomes as the conventional 3-stage LAARP procedure. It provides an alternative method to rectify the ARMs with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula without colostomy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6133544/ /pubmed/30095662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011843 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Xiao, Hui
Huang, Rui
Chen, Long
Diao, Mei
Cheng, Wei
Li, Long
Cui, Xiao-Dai
The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study
title The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study
title_full The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study
title_short The midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort midterm outcomes of 1-stage versus 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in anorectal malformations with rectoprostatic fistula and rectobulbar fistula: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30095662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011843
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaohui themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangrui themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenlong themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT diaomei themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chengwei themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lilong themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cuixiaodai themidtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xiaohui midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangrui midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenlong midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT diaomei midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chengwei midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lilong midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cuixiaodai midtermoutcomesof1stageversus3stagelaparoscopicassistedanorectoplastyinanorectalmalformationswithrectoprostaticfistulaandrectobulbarfistulaaretrospectivecohortstudy