Cargando…

Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type

Background and study aims  To compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic). Patients and methods  Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portillo, Isabel, Idigoras, Isabel, Bilbao, Isabel, Arana-Arri, Eunate, Fernández-Landa, María José, Hurtado, Jose Luis, Sarasaqueta, Cristina, Bujanda, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0655-1987
_version_ 1783354562973794304
author Portillo, Isabel
Idigoras, Isabel
Bilbao, Isabel
Arana-Arri, Eunate
Fernández-Landa, María José
Hurtado, Jose Luis
Sarasaqueta, Cristina
Bujanda, Luis
author_facet Portillo, Isabel
Idigoras, Isabel
Bilbao, Isabel
Arana-Arri, Eunate
Fernández-Landa, María José
Hurtado, Jose Luis
Sarasaqueta, Cristina
Bujanda, Luis
author_sort Portillo, Isabel
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  To compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic). Patients and methods  Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces) between January 2009 and September 2016 were prospectively included at five academic and seven non-academic public hospitals. Screening colonoscopy quality indicators considered were adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, complications and bowel preparation quality. Results  A total of 48,759 patients underwent colonoscopy, 34,616 (80 %) in academic hospitals and 14,143 in non-academic hospitals. Among these cases, 19,942 (37.1 %) advanced adenomas and 2,607 (5.3 %) colorectal cancers (CRCs) were detected, representing a total of 22,549 (46.2 %) cases of advanced neoplasia. The adenoma detection rate was 64 %, 63.1 % in academic hospitals and 66.4 % in non-academic hospitals ( P  < 0.001). Rates of advanced adenoma detection, cecal intubation and adequate colonic preparation were 45.8 %, 96.2 % and 88.3 %, respectively, and in all cases were lower (implying worse quality care) in academic hospitals (45.3 % vs 48.7 %; odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.84 – 0.91; 95.9 % vs 97 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.38 – 0.69; and 86.4 % vs 93 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.45 – 0.5; respectively; P  < 0.001 in all cases). In 13 patients, all in the academic hospital group, CRC was diagnosed after colonoscopy (0.26 cases × 1000 colonoscopies). Rates of CRC treated by endoscopy were similar in both types of hospital (30 %). The rate of severe complication was 1.2 % (602 patients), with no significant differences by hospital type: bleeding occurred in 1/147 colonoscopies and perforation in 1/329. One patient died within 30 days after screening colonoscopy. Conclusions  The quality of colonoscopy was better in non-academic hospitals. The rate of detection of advanced neoplasia was higher in non-academic hospitals and correlated with the rate of post-colonoscopy CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61336812018-09-12 Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type Portillo, Isabel Idigoras, Isabel Bilbao, Isabel Arana-Arri, Eunate Fernández-Landa, María José Hurtado, Jose Luis Sarasaqueta, Cristina Bujanda, Luis Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  To compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic). Patients and methods  Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces) between January 2009 and September 2016 were prospectively included at five academic and seven non-academic public hospitals. Screening colonoscopy quality indicators considered were adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, complications and bowel preparation quality. Results  A total of 48,759 patients underwent colonoscopy, 34,616 (80 %) in academic hospitals and 14,143 in non-academic hospitals. Among these cases, 19,942 (37.1 %) advanced adenomas and 2,607 (5.3 %) colorectal cancers (CRCs) were detected, representing a total of 22,549 (46.2 %) cases of advanced neoplasia. The adenoma detection rate was 64 %, 63.1 % in academic hospitals and 66.4 % in non-academic hospitals ( P  < 0.001). Rates of advanced adenoma detection, cecal intubation and adequate colonic preparation were 45.8 %, 96.2 % and 88.3 %, respectively, and in all cases were lower (implying worse quality care) in academic hospitals (45.3 % vs 48.7 %; odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.84 – 0.91; 95.9 % vs 97 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.38 – 0.69; and 86.4 % vs 93 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.45 – 0.5; respectively; P  < 0.001 in all cases). In 13 patients, all in the academic hospital group, CRC was diagnosed after colonoscopy (0.26 cases × 1000 colonoscopies). Rates of CRC treated by endoscopy were similar in both types of hospital (30 %). The rate of severe complication was 1.2 % (602 patients), with no significant differences by hospital type: bleeding occurred in 1/147 colonoscopies and perforation in 1/329. One patient died within 30 days after screening colonoscopy. Conclusions  The quality of colonoscopy was better in non-academic hospitals. The rate of detection of advanced neoplasia was higher in non-academic hospitals and correlated with the rate of post-colonoscopy CRC. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-09 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6133681/ /pubmed/30211306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0655-1987 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Portillo, Isabel
Idigoras, Isabel
Bilbao, Isabel
Arana-Arri, Eunate
Fernández-Landa, María José
Hurtado, Jose Luis
Sarasaqueta, Cristina
Bujanda, Luis
Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
title Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
title_full Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
title_fullStr Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
title_short Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
title_sort colorectal cancer screening program using fit: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30211306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0655-1987
work_keys_str_mv AT portilloisabel colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT idigorasisabel colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT bilbaoisabel colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT aranaarrieunate colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT fernandezlandamariajose colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT hurtadojoseluis colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT sarasaquetacristina colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT bujandaluis colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype
AT colorectalcancerscreeningprogramusingfitqualityofcolonoscopyvariesaccordingtohospitaltype