Cargando…

Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch

This study investigated the biomechanical responses of neonatal piglet brachial plexus (BP) segments—root/trunk, chord, and nerve at two different rates, 0.01 mm/second (quasistatic) and 10 mm/second (dynamic)—and compared their response to another peripheral nerve (tibial). Comparisons of mechanica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Anita, Shaji, Shania, Delivoria-Papadopoulos, Maria, Balasubramanian, Sriram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669405
_version_ 1783354563670048768
author Singh, Anita
Shaji, Shania
Delivoria-Papadopoulos, Maria
Balasubramanian, Sriram
author_facet Singh, Anita
Shaji, Shania
Delivoria-Papadopoulos, Maria
Balasubramanian, Sriram
author_sort Singh, Anita
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the biomechanical responses of neonatal piglet brachial plexus (BP) segments—root/trunk, chord, and nerve at two different rates, 0.01 mm/second (quasistatic) and 10 mm/second (dynamic)—and compared their response to another peripheral nerve (tibial). Comparisons of mechanical responses at two different rates reported a significantly higher maximum load, maximum stress, and Young's modulus (E) values when subjected to dynamic rate. Among various BP segments, maximum stress was significantly higher in the nerve segments, followed by chord and then the root/trunk segments except no differences between chord and root/trunk segments at quasistatic rate. E values exhibited similar behavior except no differences between the chord and root/trunk segments at both rates and no differences between chord and nerve segments at quasistatic rate. No differences were observed in the strain values. When compared with the tibial nerve, only mechanical properties of BP nerves were similar to the tibial nerve. Mechanical stresses and E values reported in BP root/trunk and chord segments were significantly lower than tibial nerve at both rates. When comparing the failure pattern, at quasistatic rate, necking was observed at maximum load, before a complete rupture occurred. At dynamic rate, partial rupture at maximum load, followed by a full rupture, was observed. Occurrence of the rate-dependent failure phenomenon was highest in the root/trunk segments followed by chord and nerve segments. Differences in the maximum stress, E values, and failure pattern of BP segments confirm variability in their anatomical structure and warrant future histological studies to better understand their stretch responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61336932018-09-12 Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch Singh, Anita Shaji, Shania Delivoria-Papadopoulos, Maria Balasubramanian, Sriram J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj This study investigated the biomechanical responses of neonatal piglet brachial plexus (BP) segments—root/trunk, chord, and nerve at two different rates, 0.01 mm/second (quasistatic) and 10 mm/second (dynamic)—and compared their response to another peripheral nerve (tibial). Comparisons of mechanical responses at two different rates reported a significantly higher maximum load, maximum stress, and Young's modulus (E) values when subjected to dynamic rate. Among various BP segments, maximum stress was significantly higher in the nerve segments, followed by chord and then the root/trunk segments except no differences between chord and root/trunk segments at quasistatic rate. E values exhibited similar behavior except no differences between the chord and root/trunk segments at both rates and no differences between chord and nerve segments at quasistatic rate. No differences were observed in the strain values. When compared with the tibial nerve, only mechanical properties of BP nerves were similar to the tibial nerve. Mechanical stresses and E values reported in BP root/trunk and chord segments were significantly lower than tibial nerve at both rates. When comparing the failure pattern, at quasistatic rate, necking was observed at maximum load, before a complete rupture occurred. At dynamic rate, partial rupture at maximum load, followed by a full rupture, was observed. Occurrence of the rate-dependent failure phenomenon was highest in the root/trunk segments followed by chord and nerve segments. Differences in the maximum stress, E values, and failure pattern of BP segments confirm variability in their anatomical structure and warrant future histological studies to better understand their stretch responses. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6133693/ /pubmed/30210576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669405 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Singh, Anita
Shaji, Shania
Delivoria-Papadopoulos, Maria
Balasubramanian, Sriram
Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch
title Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch
title_full Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch
title_fullStr Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch
title_short Biomechanical Responses of Neonatal Brachial Plexus to Mechanical Stretch
title_sort biomechanical responses of neonatal brachial plexus to mechanical stretch
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669405
work_keys_str_mv AT singhanita biomechanicalresponsesofneonatalbrachialplexustomechanicalstretch
AT shajishania biomechanicalresponsesofneonatalbrachialplexustomechanicalstretch
AT delivoriapapadopoulosmaria biomechanicalresponsesofneonatalbrachialplexustomechanicalstretch
AT balasubramaniansriram biomechanicalresponsesofneonatalbrachialplexustomechanicalstretch