Cargando…

Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG

OBJECTIVE: Visual EEG analysis is the gold standard for clinical EEG interpretation and analysis, but there is no published data on how long it takes to review and report an EEG in clinical routine. Estimates of reporting times may inform workforce planning and automation initiatives for EEG. The SC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brogger, Jan, Eichele, Tom, Aanestad, Eivind, Olberg, Henning, Hjelland, Ina, Aurlien, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30215010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.03.002
_version_ 1783354569351233536
author Brogger, Jan
Eichele, Tom
Aanestad, Eivind
Olberg, Henning
Hjelland, Ina
Aurlien, Harald
author_facet Brogger, Jan
Eichele, Tom
Aanestad, Eivind
Olberg, Henning
Hjelland, Ina
Aurlien, Harald
author_sort Brogger, Jan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Visual EEG analysis is the gold standard for clinical EEG interpretation and analysis, but there is no published data on how long it takes to review and report an EEG in clinical routine. Estimates of reporting times may inform workforce planning and automation initiatives for EEG. The SCORE standard has recently been adopted to standardize clinical EEG reporting, but concern has been expressed about the time spent reporting. METHODS: Elapsed times were extracted from 5889 standard and sleep-deprived EEGs reported between 2015 and 2017 reported using the SCORE EEG software. RESULTS: The median review time for standard EEG was 12.5 min, and for sleep deprived EEG 20.9 min. A normal standard EEG had a median review time of 8.3 min. Abnormal EEGs took longer than normal EEGs to review, and had more variable review times. 99% of EEGs were reported within 24 h of end of recording. Review times declined by 25% during the study period. CONCLUSION: Standard and sleep-deprived EEG review and reporting times with SCORE EEG are reasonable, increasing with increasing EEG complexity and decreasing with experience. EEG reports can be provided within 24 h. SIGNIFICANCE: Clinical standard and sleep-deprived EEG reporting with SCORE EEG has acceptable reporting times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61339122018-09-13 Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG Brogger, Jan Eichele, Tom Aanestad, Eivind Olberg, Henning Hjelland, Ina Aurlien, Harald Clin Neurophysiol Pract Clinical and Research Article OBJECTIVE: Visual EEG analysis is the gold standard for clinical EEG interpretation and analysis, but there is no published data on how long it takes to review and report an EEG in clinical routine. Estimates of reporting times may inform workforce planning and automation initiatives for EEG. The SCORE standard has recently been adopted to standardize clinical EEG reporting, but concern has been expressed about the time spent reporting. METHODS: Elapsed times were extracted from 5889 standard and sleep-deprived EEGs reported between 2015 and 2017 reported using the SCORE EEG software. RESULTS: The median review time for standard EEG was 12.5 min, and for sleep deprived EEG 20.9 min. A normal standard EEG had a median review time of 8.3 min. Abnormal EEGs took longer than normal EEGs to review, and had more variable review times. 99% of EEGs were reported within 24 h of end of recording. Review times declined by 25% during the study period. CONCLUSION: Standard and sleep-deprived EEG review and reporting times with SCORE EEG are reasonable, increasing with increasing EEG complexity and decreasing with experience. EEG reports can be provided within 24 h. SIGNIFICANCE: Clinical standard and sleep-deprived EEG reporting with SCORE EEG has acceptable reporting times. Elsevier 2018-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6133912/ /pubmed/30215010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.03.002 Text en © 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical and Research Article
Brogger, Jan
Eichele, Tom
Aanestad, Eivind
Olberg, Henning
Hjelland, Ina
Aurlien, Harald
Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG
title Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG
title_full Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG
title_fullStr Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG
title_full_unstemmed Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG
title_short Visual EEG reviewing times with SCORE EEG
title_sort visual eeg reviewing times with score eeg
topic Clinical and Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30215010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT broggerjan visualeegreviewingtimeswithscoreeeg
AT eicheletom visualeegreviewingtimeswithscoreeeg
AT aanestadeivind visualeegreviewingtimeswithscoreeeg
AT olberghenning visualeegreviewingtimeswithscoreeeg
AT hjellandina visualeegreviewingtimeswithscoreeeg
AT aurlienharald visualeegreviewingtimeswithscoreeeg