Cargando…
User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is gaining recognition from physicians, pharmacists and patients as a tool for evidence-based medication management. However, seemingly similar PGx testing panels (and PGx-based decision support tools) can diverge in their technological specifications, as well as the ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0065-4 |
_version_ | 1783354581996011520 |
---|---|
author | Mukerjee, Gouri Huston, Andrea Kabakchiev, Boyko Piquette-Miller, Micheline van Schaik, Ron Dorfman, Ruslan |
author_facet | Mukerjee, Gouri Huston, Andrea Kabakchiev, Boyko Piquette-Miller, Micheline van Schaik, Ron Dorfman, Ruslan |
author_sort | Mukerjee, Gouri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is gaining recognition from physicians, pharmacists and patients as a tool for evidence-based medication management. However, seemingly similar PGx testing panels (and PGx-based decision support tools) can diverge in their technological specifications, as well as the genetic factors that determine test specificity and sensitivity, and hence offer different values for users. Reluctance to embrace PGx testing is often the result of unfamiliarity with PGx technology, a lack of knowledge about the availability of curated guidelines/evidence for drug dosing recommendations, and an absence of wide-spread institutional implementation efforts and educational support. Demystifying an often confusing and variable PGx marketplace can lead to greater acceptance of PGx as a standard-of-care practice that improves drug outcomes and provides a lifetime value for patients. Here, we highlight the key underlying factors of a PGx test that should be considered, and discuss the current progress of PGx implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6133969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61339692018-09-12 User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools Mukerjee, Gouri Huston, Andrea Kabakchiev, Boyko Piquette-Miller, Micheline van Schaik, Ron Dorfman, Ruslan NPJ Genom Med Review Article Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is gaining recognition from physicians, pharmacists and patients as a tool for evidence-based medication management. However, seemingly similar PGx testing panels (and PGx-based decision support tools) can diverge in their technological specifications, as well as the genetic factors that determine test specificity and sensitivity, and hence offer different values for users. Reluctance to embrace PGx testing is often the result of unfamiliarity with PGx technology, a lack of knowledge about the availability of curated guidelines/evidence for drug dosing recommendations, and an absence of wide-spread institutional implementation efforts and educational support. Demystifying an often confusing and variable PGx marketplace can lead to greater acceptance of PGx as a standard-of-care practice that improves drug outcomes and provides a lifetime value for patients. Here, we highlight the key underlying factors of a PGx test that should be considered, and discuss the current progress of PGx implementation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6133969/ /pubmed/30210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0065-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mukerjee, Gouri Huston, Andrea Kabakchiev, Boyko Piquette-Miller, Micheline van Schaik, Ron Dorfman, Ruslan User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
title | User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
title_full | User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
title_fullStr | User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
title_full_unstemmed | User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
title_short | User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
title_sort | user considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0065-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mukerjeegouri userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools AT hustonandrea userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools AT kabakchievboyko userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools AT piquettemillermicheline userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools AT vanschaikron userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools AT dorfmanruslan userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools |