Cargando…

User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools

Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is gaining recognition from physicians, pharmacists and patients as a tool for evidence-based medication management. However, seemingly similar PGx testing panels (and PGx-based decision support tools) can diverge in their technological specifications, as well as the ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukerjee, Gouri, Huston, Andrea, Kabakchiev, Boyko, Piquette-Miller, Micheline, van Schaik, Ron, Dorfman, Ruslan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0065-4
_version_ 1783354581996011520
author Mukerjee, Gouri
Huston, Andrea
Kabakchiev, Boyko
Piquette-Miller, Micheline
van Schaik, Ron
Dorfman, Ruslan
author_facet Mukerjee, Gouri
Huston, Andrea
Kabakchiev, Boyko
Piquette-Miller, Micheline
van Schaik, Ron
Dorfman, Ruslan
author_sort Mukerjee, Gouri
collection PubMed
description Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is gaining recognition from physicians, pharmacists and patients as a tool for evidence-based medication management. However, seemingly similar PGx testing panels (and PGx-based decision support tools) can diverge in their technological specifications, as well as the genetic factors that determine test specificity and sensitivity, and hence offer different values for users. Reluctance to embrace PGx testing is often the result of unfamiliarity with PGx technology, a lack of knowledge about the availability of curated guidelines/evidence for drug dosing recommendations, and an absence of wide-spread institutional implementation efforts and educational support. Demystifying an often confusing and variable PGx marketplace can lead to greater acceptance of PGx as a standard-of-care practice that improves drug outcomes and provides a lifetime value for patients. Here, we highlight the key underlying factors of a PGx test that should be considered, and discuss the current progress of PGx implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61339692018-09-12 User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools Mukerjee, Gouri Huston, Andrea Kabakchiev, Boyko Piquette-Miller, Micheline van Schaik, Ron Dorfman, Ruslan NPJ Genom Med Review Article Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is gaining recognition from physicians, pharmacists and patients as a tool for evidence-based medication management. However, seemingly similar PGx testing panels (and PGx-based decision support tools) can diverge in their technological specifications, as well as the genetic factors that determine test specificity and sensitivity, and hence offer different values for users. Reluctance to embrace PGx testing is often the result of unfamiliarity with PGx technology, a lack of knowledge about the availability of curated guidelines/evidence for drug dosing recommendations, and an absence of wide-spread institutional implementation efforts and educational support. Demystifying an often confusing and variable PGx marketplace can lead to greater acceptance of PGx as a standard-of-care practice that improves drug outcomes and provides a lifetime value for patients. Here, we highlight the key underlying factors of a PGx test that should be considered, and discuss the current progress of PGx implementation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6133969/ /pubmed/30210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0065-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mukerjee, Gouri
Huston, Andrea
Kabakchiev, Boyko
Piquette-Miller, Micheline
van Schaik, Ron
Dorfman, Ruslan
User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
title User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
title_full User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
title_fullStr User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
title_full_unstemmed User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
title_short User considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
title_sort user considerations in assessing pharmacogenomic tests and their clinical support tools
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0065-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mukerjeegouri userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools
AT hustonandrea userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools
AT kabakchievboyko userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools
AT piquettemillermicheline userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools
AT vanschaikron userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools
AT dorfmanruslan userconsiderationsinassessingpharmacogenomictestsandtheirclinicalsupporttools