Cargando…

非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with early-staged thymic tumors, while chemotherapy is most commonly used in stage Ⅳ cases.As for locally advanced thymic tumors, especially those unsuitable for surgery, the optimal therapy is still controve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.07.11
_version_ 1783354585318948864
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with early-staged thymic tumors, while chemotherapy is most commonly used in stage Ⅳ cases.As for locally advanced thymic tumors, especially those unsuitable for surgery, the optimal therapy is still controversial.Thus, we conducted this retrospective study by comparing three nonsurgical treatment modalities to find some clues. METHODS: Three treatment modalities were used in 42 patients from October 2000 to December 2010, including radiotherapy (RT) alone, sequential chemoradiation (SCRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT).Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the three regimens were compared accordingly. RESULTS: The ORR in all 42 patients was 61.9%, and 5-year OS was 46%.The ORR of RT, SCRT and CCRT were 43.8%, 50% and 87.5%, respectively (RT vs SCRT, P=0.692;RT vs CCRT, P=0.009;SCRT vs CCRT, P=0.051).The 5-year OS of RT, SCRT and CCRT were 30%, 50% and 61.9%, respectively (RT vs SCRT, P=0.230;RT vs CCRT, P=0.011;SCRT vs CCRT, P=0.282).Eleven patients developed neutropenia of grade 3-4, with 7 in CCRT group and 4 in SCRT, respectively.Nine patients experienced esophagitis of grade 3 with 2 in RT, 3 in SCRT and 4 in CCRT.There were also two cases of grade 3 radiation induced pneumonitis in CCRT group.No life-threatening side effects were noted. CONCLUSION: When used to treat locally advanced thymic tumors unsuitable for surgery, CCRT performed more favorably than RT alone or SCRT in both tumor response and long time survival, but probably with the increasing risk of pulmonary damage.CCRT may offer the best chance of disease control in the management of locally advanced disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6133979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61339792018-10-02 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 2016胸外医师年会特约专题:胸腺肿瘤 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with early-staged thymic tumors, while chemotherapy is most commonly used in stage Ⅳ cases.As for locally advanced thymic tumors, especially those unsuitable for surgery, the optimal therapy is still controversial.Thus, we conducted this retrospective study by comparing three nonsurgical treatment modalities to find some clues. METHODS: Three treatment modalities were used in 42 patients from October 2000 to December 2010, including radiotherapy (RT) alone, sequential chemoradiation (SCRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT).Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the three regimens were compared accordingly. RESULTS: The ORR in all 42 patients was 61.9%, and 5-year OS was 46%.The ORR of RT, SCRT and CCRT were 43.8%, 50% and 87.5%, respectively (RT vs SCRT, P=0.692;RT vs CCRT, P=0.009;SCRT vs CCRT, P=0.051).The 5-year OS of RT, SCRT and CCRT were 30%, 50% and 61.9%, respectively (RT vs SCRT, P=0.230;RT vs CCRT, P=0.011;SCRT vs CCRT, P=0.282).Eleven patients developed neutropenia of grade 3-4, with 7 in CCRT group and 4 in SCRT, respectively.Nine patients experienced esophagitis of grade 3 with 2 in RT, 3 in SCRT and 4 in CCRT.There were also two cases of grade 3 radiation induced pneumonitis in CCRT group.No life-threatening side effects were noted. CONCLUSION: When used to treat locally advanced thymic tumors unsuitable for surgery, CCRT performed more favorably than RT alone or SCRT in both tumor response and long time survival, but probably with the increasing risk of pulmonary damage.CCRT may offer the best chance of disease control in the management of locally advanced disease. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6133979/ /pubmed/27339726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.07.11 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 2016胸外医师年会特约专题:胸腺肿瘤
非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
title 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
title_full 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
title_fullStr 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
title_full_unstemmed 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
title_short 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
title_sort 非手术方法治疗局部侵袭性胸腺肿瘤
topic 2016胸外医师年会特约专题:胸腺肿瘤
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6133979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.07.11
work_keys_str_mv AT fēishǒushùfāngfǎzhìliáojúbùqīnxíxìngxiōngxiànzhǒngliú
AT fēishǒushùfāngfǎzhìliáojúbùqīnxíxìngxiōngxiànzhǒngliú
AT fēishǒushùfāngfǎzhìliáojúbùqīnxíxìngxiōngxiànzhǒngliú
AT fēishǒushùfāngfǎzhìliáojúbùqīnxíxìngxiōngxiànzhǒngliú
AT fēishǒushùfāngfǎzhìliáojúbùqīnxíxìngxiōngxiànzhǒngliú